Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.intel > #154

Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling

Date 2011-12-05 11:35 -0500
From Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com>
Newsgroups comp.sys.intel
Subject Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling
References (3 earlier) <a6l2d71tmlob774vm7c8vsou4kui29hv2j@4ax.com> <4ed3449f$1@news.bnb-lp.com> <q657d7131md3g79s8mqqkgovgd7tsum6mh@4ax.com> <4ed439e3$1@news.bnb-lp.com> <4eda21a6$1@x-privat.org>
Message-ID <4edcf2f0@news.bnb-lp.com> (permalink)
Organization Send abuse or DMCA complaints to abuse@bnb-lp.com

Show all headers | View raw


On 03/12/2011 8:18 AM, Orson Cart wrote:
> Yousuf Khan<bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com>  wrote:
>>
>> No, but I'm also not in the market for any sort of aftermarket cooling
>>
>> system either. I figure by the time I'm ready to go there, I'll be
>> able
>> to really research it. Both AMD and Intel are now offering water-cooling
>>
>> on their next-gen processors. Also I got a pretty decent full-tower
>>
>> case, just upgraded last year, which already has holes drilled in
>> for
>> water-cooling pipes.
>>
>>
> What took them so long? I recall years ago a Pentium D 3.4 GHz, that was amazingly
> rated at 95 W TDP. Yet the Intel cooler was maximum RPM within 90 seconds of
> booting. Surely they needed better cooling way back then.

I think they were able to hang onto the traditional cooling systems 
longer with the advance of internal CPU thermal control circuitry. The 
processors wouldn't get to high temperatures until they were really 
pushed for power.

	Yousuf Khan

Back to comp.sys.intel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2011-11-10 02:14 -0500
  Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling "Orson Cart" <ex-privat@parts.org> - 2011-11-10 13:24 +0100
    Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2011-11-10 14:50 -0500
  Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling willbill <postonNG@postonNG.net> - 2011-11-20 11:17 -0600
    Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2011-11-26 00:19 -0500
      Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling willbill <postonNG@postonNG.net> - 2011-11-26 15:59 -0600
        Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2011-11-28 03:21 -0500
          Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling willbill <postonNG@postonNG.net> - 2011-11-28 08:40 -0600
            Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2011-11-28 20:48 -0500
              Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling "Orson Cart" <ex-privat@parts.org> - 2011-12-03 14:18 +0100
                Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2011-12-05 11:35 -0500

csiph-web