Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.intel > #154
| Date | 2011-12-05 11:35 -0500 |
|---|---|
| From | Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.intel |
| Subject | Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling |
| References | (3 earlier) <a6l2d71tmlob774vm7c8vsou4kui29hv2j@4ax.com> <4ed3449f$1@news.bnb-lp.com> <q657d7131md3g79s8mqqkgovgd7tsum6mh@4ax.com> <4ed439e3$1@news.bnb-lp.com> <4eda21a6$1@x-privat.org> |
| Message-ID | <4edcf2f0@news.bnb-lp.com> (permalink) |
| Organization | Send abuse or DMCA complaints to abuse@bnb-lp.com |
On 03/12/2011 8:18 AM, Orson Cart wrote: > Yousuf Khan<bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> No, but I'm also not in the market for any sort of aftermarket cooling >> >> system either. I figure by the time I'm ready to go there, I'll be >> able >> to really research it. Both AMD and Intel are now offering water-cooling >> >> on their next-gen processors. Also I got a pretty decent full-tower >> >> case, just upgraded last year, which already has holes drilled in >> for >> water-cooling pipes. >> >> > What took them so long? I recall years ago a Pentium D 3.4 GHz, that was amazingly > rated at 95 W TDP. Yet the Intel cooler was maximum RPM within 90 seconds of > booting. Surely they needed better cooling way back then. I think they were able to hang onto the traditional cooling systems longer with the advance of internal CPU thermal control circuitry. The processors wouldn't get to high temperatures until they were really pushed for power. Yousuf Khan
Back to comp.sys.intel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2011-11-10 02:14 -0500
Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling "Orson Cart" <ex-privat@parts.org> - 2011-11-10 13:24 +0100
Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2011-11-10 14:50 -0500
Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling willbill <postonNG@postonNG.net> - 2011-11-20 11:17 -0600
Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2011-11-26 00:19 -0500
Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling willbill <postonNG@postonNG.net> - 2011-11-26 15:59 -0600
Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2011-11-28 03:21 -0500
Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling willbill <postonNG@postonNG.net> - 2011-11-28 08:40 -0600
Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2011-11-28 20:48 -0500
Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling "Orson Cart" <ex-privat@parts.org> - 2011-12-03 14:18 +0100
Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2011-12-05 11:35 -0500
csiph-web