Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #61808 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-12-07 02:33 -0500 |
| Last post | 2024-12-09 22:35 +0100 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 22 participants
Thread has 1096 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1096 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-07 02:33 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 14:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 18:35 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-07 18:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 19:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 23:33 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 04:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 12:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2024-12-11 17:13 +1000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 04:21 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 12:12 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-08 16:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 21:50 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 23:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 10:47 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-09 15:35 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 16:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 22:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-10 04:41 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:47 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 22:37 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 19:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 23:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? BlueManedHawk <bluemanedhawk@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 15:15 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 21:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 04:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-08 04:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 08:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-08 02:37 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 08:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 13:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-08 16:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-08 18:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-09 01:13 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 00:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-08 01:08 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 08:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 14:58 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-08 16:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 21:54 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 23:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-08 23:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-09 00:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-09 00:20 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-10 04:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-10 01:11 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 10:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 12:49 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-09 17:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 17:27 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-09 23:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 10:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-10 11:16 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 21:49 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 00:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 10:26 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-10 04:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 14:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-10 04:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 14:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 20:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 21:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-11 13:49 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 17:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-11 16:44 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 21:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 02:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 10:32 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 20:57 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 02:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 10:27 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-12 19:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 21:29 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-13 13:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:43 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 19:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 20:21 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:29 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:18 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 01:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 11:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 18:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 03:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:30 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-15 21:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:12 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 03:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:29 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 00:54 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:56 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-17 04:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 19:48 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 11:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 14:29 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 14:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 19:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:44 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:26 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-17 10:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 19:54 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 22:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:47 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 20:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 10:49 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-09 23:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 10:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 20:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 22:07 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 23:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-11 03:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 11:01 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-11 01:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2024-12-11 04:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-11 13:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 11:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 02:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2024-12-12 04:06 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 08:50 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 10:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 20:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 21:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 02:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:25 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 21:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 12:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 19:47 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 20:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:30 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 01:37 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 11:33 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 01:52 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:58 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2024-12-17 04:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 20:36 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-18 00:31 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:05 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:50 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 21:46 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 03:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:30 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 20:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:09 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-18 19:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 23:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 09:42 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:39 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 15:58 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 15:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 16:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-19 19:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 22:41 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:49 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 18:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:16 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 10:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 21:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-12 23:42 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 08:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2024-12-13 09:37 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:08 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-12 11:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-11 13:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-10 05:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-10 01:49 -0500
Joy of Hydrogen (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-11 13:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 23:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-09 00:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-09 01:16 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 10:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 12:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 21:50 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 21:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 23:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 10:58 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-11 10:37 +0000
Joy of Nuclear Power (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-11 13:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 17:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-11 16:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 21:56 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-12 10:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 16:13 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-12 15:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 21:28 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-13 06:42 +1000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:00 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 10:58 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-14 07:51 +1000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-12-14 11:37 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 13:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-12-15 10:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-15 11:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-12-15 16:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-15 16:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 19:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-12 21:31 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:09 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 13:32 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 19:11 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 19:02 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:15 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 02:16 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 11:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-15 12:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 17:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 18:41 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:01 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 03:57 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:38 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:36 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-19 00:00 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 11:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-20 01:31 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:57 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 11:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 15:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 17:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 03:09 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:25 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 02:30 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-23 01:34 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-20 21:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 11:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 13:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 19:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 19:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:40 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 17:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 03:00 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 20:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 02:27 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 07:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 08:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 20:06 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:43 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:47 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:12 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 21:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 12:47 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 20:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 22:54 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 20:32 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:50 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:35 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:09 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 20:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 22:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 01:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 15:15 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 20:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 22:57 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 00:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 12:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 19:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 22:52 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 02:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:44 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 18:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-26 19:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 00:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-27 17:37 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-26 22:41 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 05:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-27 23:44 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-28 16:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:27 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-27 23:51 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:42 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:13 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-27 18:06 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 01:16 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 00:02 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 06:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 02:31 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:50 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-28 17:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? pH <wNOSPAMp@gmail.org> - 2025-01-01 05:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-27 17:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-23 21:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 01:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 12:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 13:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 23:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 19:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 23:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-20 01:33 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 11:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 14:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 14:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 19:43 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-17 10:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-18 09:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:15 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:01 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 04:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 21:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:38 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 21:38 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 03:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 20:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 21:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 23:55 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 07:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 11:01 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:44 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 21:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-12 23:37 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:33 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:08 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 21:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 12:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 19:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:16 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 02:06 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-15 00:17 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 11:40 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-15 12:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 17:57 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 19:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 03:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:37 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-17 10:21 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 19:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 21:22 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2024-12-19 04:42 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 17:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 19:05 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 22:21 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:46 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 18:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 20:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:38 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 02:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 21:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:02 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 15:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 08:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 21:54 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 00:50 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 08:42 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 20:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 22:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 01:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 15:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 19:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 22:40 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 01:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 12:27 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 19:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 22:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-25 20:08 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 19:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-26 21:41 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 04:57 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-27 00:54 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-27 09:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 18:04 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:16 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 01:52 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 11:02 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 01:45 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 11:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:39 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 21:27 +0000
The Joy of Tax Havens Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-29 00:53 +0000
Re: The Joy of Tax Havens D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 21:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-27 09:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:32 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 18:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 23:22 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:07 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:25 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 18:30 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:24 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 01:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:33 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 11:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 20:57 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 20:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:24 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 02:47 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-25 20:04 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 04:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 14:35 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:12 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 23:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:08 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 11:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 11:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 12:04 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 12:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 12:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 20:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 11:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-31 20:44 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 12:52 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-01 22:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-02 12:16 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-02 20:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-03 00:58 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 08:36 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-03 12:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 23:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 06:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 01:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:36 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:32 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 21:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 19:47 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 13:07 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 12:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 20:21 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 20:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:44 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 01:32 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 20:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 01:25 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:58 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 20:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-29 00:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 01:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 01:01 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 01:00 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 07:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 11:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 12:38 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 12:30 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 11:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-31 20:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 22:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 12:47 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-01 12:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 12:37 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-01 21:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 00:11 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 06:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 01:58 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 07:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 03:22 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 11:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 20:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 20:02 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 23:43 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 11:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 23:47 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 00:59 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-22 17:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 22:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-23 01:12 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 08:57 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 20:22 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:52 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-23 20:58 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 12:44 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 00:17 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-16 21:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:12 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 23:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 16:01 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 15:35 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 17:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 18:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 01:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:32 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 18:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:24 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:13 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 18:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:24 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 00:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:02 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 19:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 23:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 19:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 02:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:35 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 19:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 01:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:07 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 21:04 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 23:09 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 01:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:26 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 20:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-23 21:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 02:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 14:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-27 18:41 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-23 00:35 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 06:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:46 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 21:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 12:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 19:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 22:52 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 01:49 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 12:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 19:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 22:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 01:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:28 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 19:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 18:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:29 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 01:02 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 21:36 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:26 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 19:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 13:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 20:30 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:45 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-26 03:06 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 04:50 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:46 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-24 00:58 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 15:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 19:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 22:46 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 01:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 12:30 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 20:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 23:05 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 03:27 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 19:31 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 19:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 00:27 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 00:06 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 20:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 11:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-28 17:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-28 17:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 20:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-29 00:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 01:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-29 16:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 19:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 13:08 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 20:32 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:46 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:02 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 12:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-29 16:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 19:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 12:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 12:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 20:44 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 11:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:48 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-01 03:23 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 12:58 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-01 22:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-02 12:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-02 20:36 +0000
The Joys of Marriage (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-03 02:02 +0000
Re: The Joys of Marriage (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 03:24 +0000
Re: The Joys of Marriage (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-03 12:34 +0100
Re: The Joys of Marriage (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-03 23:41 +0000
Re: The Joys of Marriage (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:54 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-03 12:25 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 23:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 06:57 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-04 07:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 20:49 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:18 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 20:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 13:15 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 20:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-25 20:34 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 04:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:33 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 19:02 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 18:06 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:16 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-19 16:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 17:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 19:07 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 18:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:18 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 11:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 16:02 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 20:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 02:32 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:38 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 12:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 19:30 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 02:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:11 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 21:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:05 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 17:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-19 19:35 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-19 20:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 02:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 19:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-19 19:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-19 20:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 02:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:30 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 18:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:28 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 22:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:01 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 01:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-21 03:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 01:53 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 13:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 23:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 19:58 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 07:37 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 20:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-21 21:04 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 02:44 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:40 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 01:51 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 08:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 19:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 22:28 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 10:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 13:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 23:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 09:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:26 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-23 01:59 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 09:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 13:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 21:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 21:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 01:53 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 09:22 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-22 17:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 22:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 01:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 08:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 13:00 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:28 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 21:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 12:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 14:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-27 18:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 02:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 21:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 19:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:13 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 23:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 02:39 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:11 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 23:10 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 01:50 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 10:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 22:17 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 09:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 23:02 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Don_from_AZ <djatechNOSPAM@comcast.net.invalid> - 2024-12-23 09:29 -0700
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 21:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-24 00:33 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 15:18 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 15:18 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 17:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 19:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 02:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:37 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 20:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 01:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 21:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:56 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:37 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 18:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:29 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-19 19:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-19 16:30 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-20 00:44 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:45 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 11:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 16:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:58 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 21:21 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 03:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-13 06:59 +1000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 01:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 01:02 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 14:32 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:36 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 21:57 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 23:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 11:00 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-11 02:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 11:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-11 10:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 17:15 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 02:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-10 22:49 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 23:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 10:44 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 13:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 21:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 00:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 10:30 +0100
Linux 6.12.4 (was: Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-12-10 11:47 +0000
Re: Linux 6.12.4 (was: Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-11 01:02 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 21:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-12 03:42 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 10:52 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-12 11:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 16:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 20:44 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-12 23:29 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:02 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 21:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-13 23:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 23:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 12:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 18:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 20:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:27 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 02:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 11:44 +0100
The Joy of *small* business Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-14 21:26 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:31 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-15 14:08 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-15 14:15 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 18:05 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 18:02 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 19:47 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:10 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 00:04 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:44 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 21:18 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 21:14 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 04:07 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:49 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-17 10:28 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:41 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 00:05 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 07:09 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-18 10:01 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 19:11 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-18 20:15 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 23:02 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 05:09 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 11:07 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:08 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:59 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 22:32 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 05:06 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:01 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 19:43 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 22:03 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 05:14 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 09:59 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business Don_from_AZ <djatechNOSPAM@comcast.net.invalid> - 2024-12-19 09:45 -0700
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 19:06 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 09:56 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 19:08 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-19 16:35 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 03:32 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 03:56 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 05:05 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:42 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 11:00 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 21:56 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 05:25 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 09:50 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 19:49 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 09:47 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-18 10:00 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 23:28 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-19 00:16 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:17 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:15 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-20 03:22 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 09:18 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 11:45 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 01:23 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 09:54 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 21:45 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 09:40 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:06 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 22:04 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 05:46 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 02:12 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 09:31 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 09:53 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:28 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 15:22 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 22:54 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 08:46 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:59 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-23 00:13 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-23 06:09 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 08:15 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-23 18:20 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 21:29 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 09:10 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-24 02:10 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 06:26 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:55 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 09:10 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:43 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-24 01:57 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 15:28 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-24 21:08 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 12:36 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:54 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 23:42 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 09:05 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-24 01:24 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:38 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:24 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 21:12 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:15 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 23:14 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:35 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 09:29 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 11:38 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 20:30 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 01:40 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 08:15 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:34 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-18 20:17 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:40 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:27 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 23:32 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:52 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 19:56 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:38 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:24 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 23:38 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 11:00 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-17 23:56 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:31 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 21:49 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:56 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:47 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 22:31 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:28 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 23:48 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:54 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 19:22 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:27 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:07 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 02:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 11:46 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 19:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:09 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 03:31 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:35 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-16 20:50 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 03:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:34 +0100
Newsreader mechanicals Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-17 20:17 +0000
Re: Newsreader mechanicals Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-17 18:41 -0500
Re: Newsreader mechanicals D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 19:58 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-17 20:21 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-17 20:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-19 00:10 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 11:09 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 11:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 14:28 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 11:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 14:25 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 14:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 08:42 -0800
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 17:35 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 19:45 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 12:17 -0800
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 19:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 00:16 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 12:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 12:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 00:47 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 00:42 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 10:28 +0100
Hydrogen Cars (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-11 12:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-09 00:07 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-09 06:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-11 00:54 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-11 20:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 03:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-09 14:10 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 13:30 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-09 14:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 16:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-09 22:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 09:56 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 22:40 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:27 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 21:54 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 23:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 10:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-202412.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2024-12-11 21:49 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 22:35 +0100
Page 45 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 43 44 [45] 46 47 … 50 Next page →
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-22 12:06 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: The Joy of *small* business |
| Message-ID | <6ed4a801-da2b-22f9-8251-eea654dd4046@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62867 |
On Sat, 21 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: > On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 09:54:27 +0000, Richard Kettlewell wrote: > >> Absolutely yes. People group themselves in all sorts of ways: shared >> language, shared religion, shared territory, shared enemy, shared >> preferred computing platform. Pretty much anything you can think of. > > Shared territory, or civic nationalism, appears to have its limits. The > aftermath of WWI showed you can't draw lines on a map and say > 'Congratulations! You're a country!" This lesson also applied to africa.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-21 22:04 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: The Joy of *small* business |
| Message-ID | <hLycnXYJh5xBHPr6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #62832 |
On 12/21/24 4:54 AM, Richard Kettlewell wrote: > "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> writes: >> On 12/20/24 4:18 AM, Richard Kettlewell wrote: >>> "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> writes: >>>> However there is ONE group - the Basques - who seem to have come >>>> quite early and were not over-run. >>> The local language does seem to have been resistant to replacement >>> for a >>> few thousand years. However the population genetics is rather less >>> static, with almost complete Y-chromosome replacement by R1b-M269 after >>> 2000BCE. >> >> I'd heard that - but don't ask me for a ref. >> >>> See e.g. Olalde et al, The genomic history of the Iberian Peninsula over >>> the past 8000 years. >> >> As I kinda menntioned in all this ... there's really just no such >> thing as 'genetic purity' in Europe. > > Or anywhere else. You only get genetic purity in very isolated > populations, and they start building up inherited diseases real > quick. See niche dog breeds for a non-human example. This explains the British upper class :-) >> Over thousands of years various people/groups kept moving around and >> moving around and screwing anything interesting they encountered. >> >> So, is 'nation' more a CULTURAL THING instead ? > > Absolutely yes. People group themselves in all sorts of ways: shared > language, shared religion, shared territory, shared enemy, shared > preferred computing platform. Pretty much anything you can think of. > >> 'Culture' seems more resilient - genes rather >> secondary. >> >> As for the Basques ... ONLY a 'Y' replacement seems >> very odd ..... > > It’s not hard to imagine models that produce the result observed. > e.g. suppose (1) R1b-M269 social structures led to a surplus of males > (2) that they married ‘out’ into the Iberian neolithic population > (3) they bring their technogical innovations (presumably, nomadic > pastoralism) with them, leading to greater long-term success > (4) as, initially, a relative minority they adopt the local language > (Proto-Proto-Basque or whatever) rather than bringing an IE dialect with > them as seen elsewhere in Europe. > > Not saying that’s what happened, other models are possible and reality > is usually more complex than anything you could put in a single > paragraph, just that it’s not hard to imagine ways that it could happen. Ummmm ... STILL hard to imagine JUST the 'Y'. Should have contributed 50% of the entire genome to the kiddies. As for the "WAY to weird to be sure what was going on" factor in post-glacial Europe ... THAT I'm totally down with. >> We were still speculating about 'Cheddar Man'. For awhile they figured >> African/N.African mostly based on the length/size/profile of >> bones. What LITTLE DNA they could get suggests a migrant from western >> Europe, but it was a small sample. There's also question about WHAT >> "western euro" actually MEANT, genetically, at the exact timeframe. > > I don’t think there’s any evidence that he was a migrant at all. His > genetics seem to be comparable to older remains from Britain and > Ireland. The poor old guy has spent a long time being what various entities WANTED him to be for political reasons. MAY still be ... give it another 25 years and more testing :-) Remember what they did to the Neanderthals in the 1800s : https://images.fineartamerica.com/images-medium-large-5/correze-man-neanderthal-reconstructed-illustrated-london-news-ltdmar.jpg NOW they're depicted pretty much like someone you'd see along the roadside in a Slavic farm community. https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/9673/production/_127151583_gettyimages-1235088802.jpg https://cdn.sci.news/images/enlarge11/image_12376e-Neanderthal.jpg I expect BOTH depictions are biased. Likely they DO live on in a corrupted cultural context, as the stories of 'trolls' and 'ogres'. Saw something recently, tracking-back of some genes, that suggests the body hair went away possibly as far back as 'Lucy' and friends. YET the depictions always still show shaggy Wookies ... Looks like most of the dinos had colorful 'pin-feathers' too, not grey-green 'reptile skin'. It will take the IMAGE of them 50-100 years to catch up with the research. Oh - good one ! This is supposedly a "Neanderthal Museum" in Germany : https://img.freepik.com/premium-photo/22-july-2022-neanderthal-museum-germany-detailed-wax-figure-neanderthal-prehistoric-caveman-with-spear-museum-human-sapiens-anthropology-science-theory-evolution_984126-1453.jpg?w=1800 Tall, skinny, long legs, very 'black', very "African" ... while we've long long known that lighter skin was inherited from the Neanderthals - who were stocky, robust, barrel-chested and had kinda short legs just from the skeletons :-) The humans who met them didn't look like those wax figures either. Whose 'science' is going on HERE ? While LABELED as 'Neanderthal' it MIGHT actually be a depiction of Erectus instead ... but, aside from skeletal bits, we have LITTLE idea what HE actually looked like. Coulda looked more like Brit royals ....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-22 05:46 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The Joy of *small* business |
| Message-ID | <lspnd5Fpd5U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62873 |
On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 22:04:59 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > Whose 'science' is going on HERE ? The problem of living a relatively long life is you've seen science change too many times. It hasn't made any practical difference in my life but I hit the era where conventional current flow was being replaced with electron flow in some circles and some were jiggering Fleming's little visual aid. I'm left handed which tends to lead to confusion anyway (right mouse button?) and that was the last thing I needed. As far as the squishier sciences I've visited places like National Park historic sites and when visiting at a later time have noticed the signage has been replaced with a new Just So story. In a discussion with a IRL friend last week I remarked that when I was taught history in grade and high school we knew Vortigern invited Horsa and Hengist over to fight off the Picts. Between the linguists, archaeologists and geneticists I don't even know what the current revealed truth is other than some agreement that Gildas made shit up and Bede expanded on it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glendive_Dinosaur_and_Fossil_Museum https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Museum_of_the_Rockies The Museum of the Rockies does its share of guessing but I'm more inclined to believe their tales than thinking that humans were riding dinosaurs 6000 years ago.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-22 02:12 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: The Joy of *small* business |
| Message-ID | <QuydnT2QrdBxJvr6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #62875 |
On 12/22/24 12:46 AM, rbowman wrote: > On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 22:04:59 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> Whose 'science' is going on HERE ? > > The problem of living a relatively long life is you've seen science change > too many times. It hasn't made any practical difference in my life but I > hit the era where conventional current flow was being replaced with > electron flow in some circles and some were jiggering Fleming's little > visual aid. I'm left handed which tends to lead to confusion anyway (right > mouse button?) and that was the last thing I needed. > > As far as the squishier sciences I've visited places like National Park > historic sites and when visiting at a later time have noticed the signage > has been replaced with a new Just So story. > > In a discussion with a IRL friend last week I remarked that when I was > taught history in grade and high school we knew Vortigern invited Horsa > and Hengist over to fight off the Picts. Between the linguists, > archaeologists and geneticists I don't even know what the current revealed > truth is other than some agreement that Gildas made shit up and Bede > expanded on it. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glendive_Dinosaur_and_Fossil_Museum > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Museum_of_the_Rockies Everybody goes whole-hawg with the data they HAVE, or at least the favored way of SEEING it. They will stick with that religiously until they just HAVE to change. > The Museum of the Rockies does its share of guessing but I'm more inclined > to believe their tales than thinking that humans were riding dinosaurs > 6000 years ago. Those poor people ... caught between an ever-growing mountain of facts/evidence and equally-persuasive *belief* (which requires no facts). They TRY to find ways to splice it all together. It doesn't work well ... Somewhere, their little gears are gonna just seize-up. In the news a few days ago - some ardent 'flat earther' guy (apparently a True Believer) paid big $$$ to go to the south pole in order to test his theories about a geometrically suspect 'disk shaped' earth where the north and south pole were kind of the same thing. It didn't work out for him. However he didn't QUITE admit defeat ... Sad bit is that the Greeks had it all figured out by around 500bc ... with surprising accuracy ... using naught but pointed sticks, a few bits of string and some basic geometry.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-22 09:31 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The Joy of *small* business |
| Message-ID | <lsq4iuF2ubgU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62878 |
On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 02:12:43 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > Those poor people ... caught between an ever-growing mountain of > facts/evidence and equally-persuasive *belief* (which requires no > facts). They TRY to find ways to splice it all together. It doesn't > work well ... A friend was a Young Earther despite being a proficient programmer. Given the premise God can do anything it's no problem for him to whip up the Grand Canyon with all its geological layers in his spare time. He was also well rehearsed in the creationist arguments against evolution.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-22 09:53 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The Joy of *small* business |
| Message-ID | <vk8nib$ie68$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #62882 |
On 22/12/2024 09:31, rbowman wrote: > On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 02:12:43 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> Those poor people ... caught between an ever-growing mountain of >> facts/evidence and equally-persuasive *belief* (which requires no >> facts). They TRY to find ways to splice it all together. It doesn't >> work well ... > > A friend was a Young Earther despite being a proficient programmer. Given > the premise God can do anything it's no problem for him to whip up the > Grand Canyon with all its geological layers in his spare time. He was also > well rehearsed in the creationist arguments against evolution. > The problem is, that both the scientific narrative and the creationist one are complete, logical and unassailable. One posits a supernatural 'Big Bang' from which time, space energy and the laws of nature miraculously sprang, and the other posits a big Creation from which time, space energy and the laws of nature miraculously sprang, just already formed as a complete *fake*, like someone today constructing a '1000 year old' house. Complete with faked history. The only difference is the latter big bang has a sentient intelligence with a Plan in charge. Really we only reject it on the slender basis of Occam - it's simply more complicated than necessary to explain this shit. -- “The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false face for the urge to rule it.” – H. L. Mencken
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-22 12:28 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: The Joy of *small* business |
| Message-ID | <fd79319f-61cb-9c03-df4c-7fdd06cc6247@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62885 |
On Sun, 22 Dec 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 22/12/2024 09:31, rbowman wrote: >> On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 02:12:43 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> >>> Those poor people ... caught between an ever-growing mountain of >>> facts/evidence and equally-persuasive *belief* (which requires no >>> facts). They TRY to find ways to splice it all together. It doesn't >>> work well ... >> >> A friend was a Young Earther despite being a proficient programmer. Given >> the premise God can do anything it's no problem for him to whip up the >> Grand Canyon with all its geological layers in his spare time. He was also >> well rehearsed in the creationist arguments against evolution. >> > > The problem is, that both the scientific narrative and the creationist one > are complete, logical and unassailable. > > One posits a supernatural 'Big Bang' from which time, space energy and the > laws of nature miraculously sprang, and the other posits a big Creation from > which time, space energy and the laws of nature miraculously sprang, just > already formed as a complete *fake*, like someone today constructing a '1000 > year old' house. Complete with faked history. > > The only difference is the latter big bang has a sentient intelligence with a > Plan in charge. > > Really we only reject it on the slender basis of Occam - it's simply more > complicated than necessary to explain this shit. I'd add to that that one is a process and open to change (which has happened and does happen occasionally) and the other a religion. I have mixed feelings about Occam, since Occam tends to shut down waaaay too many discussions waaay too quickly. Who is to say what is, in reality "simpler" or less complex, if the understanding of the questions is lacking?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-22 15:22 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The Joy of *small* business |
| Message-ID | <vk9arn$lsr4$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #62903 |
On 22/12/2024 11:28, D wrote: >> The only difference is the latter big bang has a sentient intelligence >> with a Plan in charge. >> >> Really we only reject it on the slender basis of Occam - it's simply >> more complicated than necessary to explain this shit. > > I'd add to that that one is a process and open to change (which has > happened and does happen occasionally) and the other a religion. > I wasn't talking about the *practice* of science, or of religion for that matter. I was talking about their metaphysical *beliefs*. > I have mixed feelings about Occam, since Occam tends to shut down waaaay > too many discussions waaay too quickly. Who is to say what is, in > reality "simpler" or less complex, if the understanding of the questions > is lacking? Precisely, In many ways the God explanation is simpler : "God did it all, and faked it so it looks like he was never there at all, to test you fuckers" ...there are only three people who understand quantum physics and two of them are liars.... But if you examine Occam from outside the confines of realism and materialism, he makes perfect sense. 1. The problem of induction means that no inference can ever be proved to be correct. 2. So given that its all bullshit anyway, why not pick the simplest bullshit that fits the facts? 3. ...And fits within the accepted already established bullshit, that works... That is today's problem., People are absolutely reluctant to abandon the established bullshit, that works. Even when they know it is actually wrong. The Kuhnian paradigm shift is staring them in the face, but they simply cant accept it. -- "Anyone who believes that the laws of physics are mere social conventions is invited to try transgressing those conventions from the windows of my apartment. (I live on the twenty-first floor.) " Alan Sokal
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-22 22:54 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: The Joy of *small* business |
| Message-ID | <1b67871a-8311-06f1-8738-c1d7068575f1@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62905 |
On Sun, 22 Dec 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 22/12/2024 11:28, D wrote: >>> The only difference is the latter big bang has a sentient intelligence >>> with a Plan in charge. >>> >>> Really we only reject it on the slender basis of Occam - it's simply more >>> complicated than necessary to explain this shit. >> >> I'd add to that that one is a process and open to change (which has >> happened and does happen occasionally) and the other a religion. >> > I wasn't talking about the *practice* of science, or of religion for that > matter. I was talking about their metaphysical *beliefs*. Ahh... our definitions differ when it comes to science. I was tricked! But I will drop this line as I think it leads us back to old threads. ;) >> I have mixed feelings about Occam, since Occam tends to shut down waaaay >> too many discussions waaay too quickly. Who is to say what is, in reality >> "simpler" or less complex, if the understanding of the questions is >> lacking? > > Precisely, In many ways the God explanation is simpler : > > "God did it all, and faked it so it looks like he was never there at all, to > test you fuckers" > > ...there are only three people who understand quantum physics and two of them > are liars.... This is the truth and exactly one of the things I do not like with Occam. If you're on team God (TM) that's the easiest explanation, if you're on team Science (C), that's nonsense, and your version is the simplest. There's no way to decide from a neutral point, if you are dealing with religious people regardless of if they are from the religion religion, or the religion science (which has very little to do with the science as a process). > But if you examine Occam from outside the confines of realism and > materialism, he makes perfect sense. > > 1. The problem of induction means that no inference can ever be proved to be > correct. > 2. So given that its all bullshit anyway, why not pick the simplest bullshit > that fits the facts? > 3. ...And fits within the accepted already established bullshit, that > works... Ah, but the problem of induction is a chimera, an illusion. Popper argued that justification is not needed at all, and seeking justification "begs for an authoritarian answer". The only thing we need to worry about is if it works, and that's it. > That is today's problem., People are absolutely reluctant to abandon the > established bullshit, that works. This is not a problem, this is the way. If it works, is in fact the only way. If that is abandoned, everything else is meaningless. That is the strength of materialism and a common, shared external world, and one of the best arguments for it. We've been down this path many times before I think. > Even when they know it is actually wrong. > > The Kuhnian paradigm shift is staring them in the face, but they simply cant > accept it. > > > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-23 08:46 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The Joy of *small* business |
| Message-ID | <vkb81d$14c3t$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #62918 |
On 22/12/2024 21:54, D wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 22 Dec 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>
>> On 22/12/2024 11:28, D wrote:
>>>> The only difference is the latter big bang has a sentient
>>>> intelligence with a Plan in charge.
>>>>
>>>> Really we only reject it on the slender basis of Occam - it's simply
>>>> more complicated than necessary to explain this shit.
>>>
>>> I'd add to that that one is a process and open to change (which has
>>> happened and does happen occasionally) and the other a religion.
>>>
>> I wasn't talking about the *practice* of science, or of religion for
>> that matter. I was talking about their metaphysical *beliefs*.
>
> Ahh... our definitions differ when it comes to science. I was tricked!
> But I will drop this line as I think it leads us back to old threads. ;)
>
>>> I have mixed feelings about Occam, since Occam tends to shut down
>>> waaaay too many discussions waaay too quickly. Who is to say what is,
>>> in reality "simpler" or less complex, if the understanding of the
>>> questions is lacking?
>>
>> Precisely, In many ways the God explanation is simpler :
>>
>> "God did it all, and faked it so it looks like he was never there at
>> all, to test you fuckers"
>>
>> ...there are only three people who understand quantum physics and two
>> of them are liars....
>
> This is the truth and exactly one of the things I do not like with
> Occam. If you're on team God (TM) that's the easiest explanation, if
> you're on team Science (C), that's nonsense, and your version is the
> simplest.
>
> There's no way to decide from a neutral point, if you are dealing with
> religious people regardless of if they are from the religion religion,
> or the religion science (which has very little to do with the science as
> a process).
>
>> But if you examine Occam from outside the confines of realism and
>> materialism, he makes perfect sense.
>>
>> 1. The problem of induction means that no inference can ever be
>> proved to be correct.
>> 2. So given that its all bullshit anyway, why not pick the simplest
>> bullshit that fits the facts?
>> 3. ...And fits within the accepted already established bullshit, that
>> works...
>
> Ah, but the problem of induction is a chimera, an illusion. Popper
> argued that justification is not needed at all, and seeking
> justification "begs for an authoritarian answer".
>
> The only thing we need to worry about is if it works, and that's it.
>
Yes, but Realist/materialists reject stuff that works on the basis that
its 'not real'...
>> That is today's problem., People are absolutely reluctant to abandon
>> the established bullshit, that works.
>
> This is not a problem, this is the way. If it works, is in fact the only
> way. If that is abandoned, everything else is meaningless. That is the
> strength of materialism and a common, shared external world, and one of
> the best arguments for it.
It is an argument for a shared external world, but not for its materiality
>
> We've been down this path many times before I think.
>
>> Even when they know it is actually wrong.
>>
>> The Kuhnian paradigm shift is staring them in the face, but they
>> simply cant accept it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
--
“Ideas are inherently conservative. They yield not to the attack of
other ideas but to the massive onslaught of circumstance"
- John K Galbraith
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-23 12:59 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: The Joy of *small* business |
| Message-ID | <c8d14250-9771-8055-ced5-ae9390fcc5c7@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62942 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 22/12/2024 21:54, D wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, 22 Dec 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> >>> On 22/12/2024 11:28, D wrote: >>>>> The only difference is the latter big bang has a sentient intelligence >>>>> with a Plan in charge. >>>>> >>>>> Really we only reject it on the slender basis of Occam - it's simply >>>>> more complicated than necessary to explain this shit. >>>> >>>> I'd add to that that one is a process and open to change (which has >>>> happened and does happen occasionally) and the other a religion. >>>> >>> I wasn't talking about the *practice* of science, or of religion for that >>> matter. I was talking about their metaphysical *beliefs*. >> >> Ahh... our definitions differ when it comes to science. I was tricked! But >> I will drop this line as I think it leads us back to old threads. ;) >> >>>> I have mixed feelings about Occam, since Occam tends to shut down waaaay >>>> too many discussions waaay too quickly. Who is to say what is, in reality >>>> "simpler" or less complex, if the understanding of the questions is >>>> lacking? >>> >>> Precisely, In many ways the God explanation is simpler : >>> >>> "God did it all, and faked it so it looks like he was never there at all, >>> to test you fuckers" >>> >>> ...there are only three people who understand quantum physics and two of >>> them are liars.... >> >> This is the truth and exactly one of the things I do not like with Occam. >> If you're on team God (TM) that's the easiest explanation, if you're on >> team Science (C), that's nonsense, and your version is the simplest. >> >> There's no way to decide from a neutral point, if you are dealing with >> religious people regardless of if they are from the religion religion, or >> the religion science (which has very little to do with the science as a >> process). >> >>> But if you examine Occam from outside the confines of realism and >>> materialism, he makes perfect sense. >>> >>> 1. The problem of induction means that no inference can ever be proved to >>> be correct. >>> 2. So given that its all bullshit anyway, why not pick the simplest >>> bullshit that fits the facts? >>> 3. ...And fits within the accepted already established bullshit, that >>> works... >> >> Ah, but the problem of induction is a chimera, an illusion. Popper argued >> that justification is not needed at all, and seeking justification "begs >> for an authoritarian answer". >> >> The only thing we need to worry about is if it works, and that's it. >> > Yes, but Realist/materialists reject stuff that works on the basis that its > 'not real'... Then they are clearly religious and not philosophers. I have no beef with the claim that religion or prayer "works". My explanation is psychological and not spiritual, and that is where my beef starts. I would think that this is obvious for even the most battle hardened materialist. >>> That is today's problem., People are absolutely reluctant to abandon the >>> established bullshit, that works. >> >> This is not a problem, this is the way. If it works, is in fact the only >> way. If that is abandoned, everything else is meaningless. That is the >> strength of materialism and a common, shared external world, and one of the >> best arguments for it. > > It is an argument for a shared external world, but not for its materiality Hmm, I find it interesting how sometimes I agree with you and sometimes I don't. This makes me suspect that it is a matter of definition and perhaps not so much about actual content of our thoughts differing. >> >> We've been down this path many times before I think. >> >>> Even when they know it is actually wrong. >>> >>> The Kuhnian paradigm shift is staring them in the face, but they simply >>> cant accept it. >>> >>> >>> >>> > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-23 00:13 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: The Joy of *small* business |
| Message-ID | <O3idneQuNpEXbPX6nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #62903 |
On 12/22/24 6:28 AM, D wrote: > > > On Sun, 22 Dec 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> On 22/12/2024 09:31, rbowman wrote: >>> On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 02:12:43 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>> >>>> Those poor people ... caught between an ever-growing mountain of >>>> facts/evidence and equally-persuasive *belief* (which requires no >>>> facts). They TRY to find ways to splice it all together. It doesn't >>>> work well ... >>> >>> A friend was a Young Earther despite being a proficient programmer. >>> Given >>> the premise God can do anything it's no problem for him to whip up the >>> Grand Canyon with all its geological layers in his spare time. He was >>> also >>> well rehearsed in the creationist arguments against evolution. >>> >> >> The problem is, that both the scientific narrative and the creationist >> one are complete, logical and unassailable. >> >> One posits a supernatural 'Big Bang' from which time, space energy and >> the laws of nature miraculously sprang, and the other posits a big >> Creation from which time, space energy and the laws of nature >> miraculously sprang, just already formed as a complete *fake*, like >> someone today constructing a '1000 year old' house. Complete with >> faked history. >> >> The only difference is the latter big bang has a sentient intelligence >> with a Plan in charge. >> >> Really we only reject it on the slender basis of Occam - it's simply >> more complicated than necessary to explain this shit. > > I'd add to that that one is a process and open to change (which has > happened and does happen occasionally) and the other a religion. MAYbe an advantage there ... but maybe NOT. Theists will say they don't NEED 'process' or 'corrections' because they were magically provided with the RIGHT ANSWER long back. They just see us bickering about whether 2+2 (common conditions) = 4 for a century or two when they knew all along. > I have mixed feelings about Occam, since Occam tends to shut down waaaay > too many discussions waaay too quickly. Who is to say what is, in > reality "simpler" or less complex, if the understanding of the questions > is lacking? Occam HAS his uses. However sometimes things ARE complicated. Read my post here to Mr. Natural about 'negative time' findings ...... https://phys.org/news/2024-12-scientists-negative-quantum.html As I said to Mr. Natural, I think we've kinda reached The Point - where human IQ just really can't COPE with the complexities of the Real Universe. The initial 'quantum-statistical' take on the negative time thing kinda smells - and there's likely only a handful of people in the world that can even wrap their brains around THAT. Next phase, very soon, NOBODY can wrap their brains around it. Yes, we can maybe make the "AI"s proceed - but we WON'T really understand what they come up with or why. At that point it all becomes 'magic' again. Chant the spells and wave the wand ...... May as well simply say Ahura Mazda just breathed it all into existence and set all the paths/rules .... No, I do NOT like it ... but this is where we've wound up ... and after just barely 200 years of Real Science. So let's not feel TOO damned proud, TOO damned superior. In the end, not TOO long, we're just gonna be another species of theists with their 'revealed truths'. Better find a way, quick, to push up human IQ into the 500 range, WITHOUT causing insanity.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-23 06:09 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The Joy of *small* business |
| Message-ID | <U87aP.62328$bYV2.3685@fx17.iad> |
| In reply to | #62931 |
On 2024-12-23, 186282@ud0s4.net <186283@ud0s4.net> wrote:
> As I said to Mr. Natural, I think we've kinda reached The Point -
> where human IQ just really can't COPE with the complexities of
> the Real Universe. The initial 'quantum-statistical' take on
> the negative time thing kinda smells - and there's likely only
> a handful of people in the world that can even wrap their
> brains around THAT. Next phase, very soon, NOBODY can wrap
> their brains around it.
>
> Yes, we can maybe make the "AI"s proceed - but we WON'T
> really understand what they come up with or why. At that
> point it all becomes 'magic' again. Chant the spells
> and wave the wand ......
>
> May as well simply say Ahura Mazda just breathed it all
> into existence and set all the paths/rules ....
Everybody is wondering what and where
They all came from
Everybody is worrying about where they're going to go
When the whole thing's done
But no one knows for certain and so it's all the same to me
I think I'll just let the mystery be
-- Iris DeMent
--
/~\ Charlie Gibbs | Growth for the sake of
\ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | growth is the ideology
X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | of the cancer cell.
/ \ if you read it the right way. | -- Edward Abbey
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-23 08:15 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The Joy of *small* business |
| Message-ID | <lsskhnFf4rcU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62933 |
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 06:09:56 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > -- Iris DeMent https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlaoR5m4L80 You need the audiovisual version. I saw her about the time she released the album of gospel songs. She said she loved gospel singing but wasn't too sure about the religion that went with it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sgx_yoe2-Y4 That the only political song she ever did afaik. It's from the '90s but is timeless.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-23 18:20 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The Joy of *small* business |
| Message-ID | <cShaP.18066$VnJ1.9524@fx44.iad> |
| In reply to | #62939 |
On 2024-12-23, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 06:09:56 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > >> -- Iris DeMent > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlaoR5m4L80 I first heard it when one of our little jamming group brought it up. Nice song. > You need the audiovisual version. I saw her about the time she released > the album of gospel songs. She said she loved gospel singing but wasn't > too sure about the religion that went with it. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sgx_yoe2-Y4 > > That the only political song she ever did afaik. It's from the '90s but is > timeless. Wow. She didn't pull any punches. -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | Growth for the sake of \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | growth is the ideology X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | of the cancer cell. / \ if you read it the right way. | -- Edward Abbey
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-23 21:29 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The Joy of *small* business |
| Message-ID | <lsu31iFmc4tU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62970 |
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 18:20:56 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2024-12-23, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 06:09:56 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >> >>> -- Iris DeMent >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlaoR5m4L80 > > I first heard it when one of our little jamming group brought it up. > Nice song. > >> You need the audiovisual version. I saw her about the time she released >> the album of gospel songs. She said she loved gospel singing but wasn't >> too sure about the religion that went with it. >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sgx_yoe2-Y4 >> >> That the only political song she ever did afaik. It's from the '90s but >> is timeless. > > Wow. She didn't pull any punches. At the time a Florida politician tried to pull funding from a NPR station for 'obscene' language. The part about 'kissing those peoples' asses' must have hit a little too close.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-23 09:10 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The Joy of *small* business |
| Message-ID | <vkb9el$14c3t$10@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #62933 |
On 23/12/2024 06:09, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > Everybody is wondering what and where > They all came from > Everybody is worrying about where they're going to go > When the whole thing's done > But no one knows for certain and so it's all the same to me > I think I'll just let the mystery be > -- Iris DeMent +1 -- "It is an established fact to 97% confidence limits that left wing conspirators see right wing conspiracies everywhere"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-24 02:10 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: The Joy of *small* business |
| Message-ID | <MuGdnVB_5bHWw_f6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #62933 |
On 12/23/24 1:09 AM, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2024-12-23, 186282@ud0s4.net <186283@ud0s4.net> wrote: > >> As I said to Mr. Natural, I think we've kinda reached The Point - >> where human IQ just really can't COPE with the complexities of >> the Real Universe. The initial 'quantum-statistical' take on >> the negative time thing kinda smells - and there's likely only >> a handful of people in the world that can even wrap their >> brains around THAT. Next phase, very soon, NOBODY can wrap >> their brains around it. >> >> Yes, we can maybe make the "AI"s proceed - but we WON'T >> really understand what they come up with or why. At that >> point it all becomes 'magic' again. Chant the spells >> and wave the wand ...... >> >> May as well simply say Ahura Mazda just breathed it all >> into existence and set all the paths/rules .... > > Everybody is wondering what and where > They all came from > Everybody is worrying about where they're going to go > When the whole thing's done > But no one knows for certain and so it's all the same to me > I think I'll just let the mystery be > -- Iris DeMent Don't really worry about 'where I came from' - that's fairly simple. Don't think anybody is 'going' anywhere. BUT, somewhere in the middle, I'd REALLY like a LOT more "understanding" of how The Machine works. BUT, barely 250 years into decent sci/tech, we're already at the practical limits of what human intelligence can calc/cope. VERY distressing. The picture even 100 years from now - wow ... it'd make a good sci-fi terror flik. MAYbe the 'Blade Runner' films kinda paint the picture ... the 'real' and 'unreal' and 'tech-magic' all blur. Nobody has a CLUE about the whats/whys anymore. And we're back to 999-AD again ....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-23 06:26 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The Joy of *small* business |
| Message-ID | <lsse54Fdti4U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62931 |
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 00:13:32 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > So let's not feel TOO damned proud, TOO damned superior. > In the end, not TOO long, we're just gonna be another species of > theists with their 'revealed truths'. The Greeks got a lot of mileage out of the hybris theme and it never worked out well for those involved. https://www.sap.com/products/acquired-brands/what-is-hybris.html I don't know if those people have a weird sense of humor or if they're completely illiterate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-23 12:55 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: The Joy of *small* business |
| Message-ID | <2fbe5c55-58c5-bb4e-3236-b73aae91d6d8@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62936 |
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: > On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 00:13:32 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> So let's not feel TOO damned proud, TOO damned superior. >> In the end, not TOO long, we're just gonna be another species of >> theists with their 'revealed truths'. > > The Greeks got a lot of mileage out of the hybris theme and it never > worked out well for those involved. > > > https://www.sap.com/products/acquired-brands/what-is-hybris.html > > I don't know if those people have a weird sense of humor or if they're > completely illiterate. > Haha brilliant! It surely must be a joke!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 45 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 43 44 [45] 46 47 … 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web