Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #37188
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Short name for USB |
| Date | 2023-02-20 11:15 +0000 |
| Organization | A little, after lunch |
| Message-ID | <tsvkp8$ogna$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (19 earlier) <63f2a6be@news.ausics.net> <0i0bcjxks1.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <pSednd0kcqIHam_-nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <63f31add@news.ausics.net> <k5h0rcFg31nU3@mid.individual.net> |
On 20/02/2023 10:37, Carlos E. R. wrote: > On 2023-02-20 08:01, Computer Nerd Kev wrote: >> 25B.E866 <25B.E866@noaaba.net> wrote: >>> On 2/19/23 8:55 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>> On 2023-02-19 23:46, Computer Nerd Kev wrote: >>>>> Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-02-19 00:23, Computer Nerd Kev wrote: >>>>>>> 25B.R866 <25B.R866@noaaba.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> ??? Electrics are VASTLY simpler machines - usually you don't >>>>>>>> ??? even need a transmission. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> MECHANICALLY simpler. If you're driving along and your motor >>>>>>> controller lets out the smoke, you're not exactly going to be able >>>>>>> to rig up a fix on the road side. Probably not even if you're the >>>>>>> engineer who designed it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Same with an ICE. >>>>>> >>>>>> If the motor computer in my gasoline car breaks, I can not start >>>>>> or run >>>>>> the car till it is repaired or replaced. >>>>> >>>>> Yes but electric isn't making that situation any better, which is >>>>> what I read from 25B.R866's "Electrics are VASTLY simpler >>>>> machines". In fact if a current model of either breaks down it's >>>>> probably an equal headache to fix because neither technology is >>>>> remotely simple anymore. >>>> >>>> >>>> Mechanically they are way simpler. >>> >>> That was my main point ... consider ALL the moving parts >>> in today's petrol engines. The things are VERY complicated. >>> Yea, x-percent of the parts are just replicated, but still >>> it's a LOT of parts and there are a few VITAL support >>> systems too. >>> >>> Electrics = stator+rotor and a couple bearings and you don't >>> even need a tranny. Feed the wheels directly and you can >>> skip the pumpkin(s) too. >>> >>> In BOTH kinds of motors, these days, there's a complicated >>> computerized control unit. They won't run without it. Yer >>> '54 Chevy would, but not anything made today. On the plus >>> side, such units are basically plug-ins - quick (but $$$) >>> to replace. >> >> Actually the complicated control unit made the mechanical parts >> less complicated in IC engines (no distributor, carburettor, >> etc.). The mechanical complexity went down, but the overall >> complexity went up. What I think you're trying to say is that >> _reliability_ is better with electric cars (provided they get the >> design right, I suppose), and in principle I agree with that. > > Well, an EV has no gears, no clutch. No transmission turbine. No oil > pump. No water cooling (maybe the batteries need that?). No belts. No > camshaft or chain. Possibly no differential transmission, or no > transmission at all. Possibly four wheel drive with no transmission. > So? Complexity does not equal unreliability if the individual components have a high MTBF and preventative maintenance is carried out. The problem is that the major component of an electric car - the battery - is likely to fail after 50-100,000 miles. One huge critical not very reliable component. I've been running battery power electric model aircraft for two decades now, on and off. THE single most unreliable item has been the flight batteries,m which you generally bin after a year or two as they lose capacity and develop high internal resistance. The second most prevalent failure in the early days was the bronze bushings and carbon brushes on the cheap DC motors we totally abused. Today they have gone and we have ball bearing equipped brushless motor driven by a $10 Chinese made controller, that is simply fit and forget. If you are conservative about your ratings that is. Electronics are remarkably reliable. Most stuff that worked once carries on working. The exception being some capacitors, and the electromechanical items like potentiometers. Semiconductors do age, and high temperatures accelerate that process so blown power stuff happens in the end if you run then too hot, but for the vast majority of low power stuff the MTBF will be several times the expected lifetime of the car. I'd say the weakest point in a battery car is the battery itself, followed by the cooling fans. Then the power transistors which will be physically large and replaceable by a fairly unskilled technician, If they are not in a simple replaceable block. And of course the aircon system, which will be just as bloody useless as it is on any IC car, and the remote keyfob, which will disintegrate leaving you totally stranded unless you can get a recode at a dealership :-) And the multitude of electrical connectors to the sensors around the motors and backs which will be exactly as unreliable as they are on an IC car., The mechanics may be simpler and not wear out, but the electrics will be even MORE complicated. Regenerative braking is one such item. Torque control on slippery surfaces is another. If you have a motor per wheel. But all is in vain until the battery problem is solved. And Physical Chemistry shows that a theoretically perfect lithium battery made out of only lithium is needed to match range with fuel engines. At the moment we are perhaps at 15% of that, and in practice will never exceed maybe 30%. Remember half the fuel in an IC engine is simply not carried in the vehicle, it is sucked out of the air. Only Lithium air batteries can match that, and they don't even work properly in the lab, and are pretty alarming beasts to consider having under your backside in a crash. BEVs constructed around electrochemical batteries will never be as ubiquitous as fuel cars. BUT to return to the point, the mechanical simplicity of an electric car will almost certainly not result in improved reliability, since unexpected mechanical failure on a well maintained modern car is fairly rare. What you will see is a virtually zero service charge, consisting probably of air and cabin filters to the various fans, all the usual aircon crap, and brakes and tyres only. And then 5 years in, a replacement battery costing one third of the cost of a new car, or more. The electric motor is like the crankshaft of an IC engine. The battery represents all the rest. And it can does and will wear out rapidly. -- How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think. Adolf Hitler
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Short name for USB db <dieterhansbritz@gmail.com> - 2023-02-09 11:28 +0100
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-09 11:55 +0100
Re: Short name for USB db <dieterhansbritz@gmail.com> - 2023-02-09 16:39 +0100
Re: Short name for USB Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2023-02-09 16:12 +0000
Re: Short name for USB The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-09 17:48 +0000
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-09 18:54 +0100
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-09 19:05 +0100
Re: Short name for USB "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-02-09 13:14 -0500
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-09 19:21 +0100
Re: Short name for USB "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> - 2023-02-09 21:53 -0500
Re: Short name for USB "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> - 2023-02-09 21:40 -0500
Re: Short name for USB pH <wNOSPAMp@gmail.org> - 2023-02-10 20:41 +0000
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-10 22:48 +0100
Re: Short name for USB The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-11 08:22 +0000
Re: Short name for USB marrgol <marrgol@address.invalid> - 2023-02-11 10:41 +0100
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-11 11:29 +0100
Re: Short name for USB The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-11 11:22 +0000
Re: Short name for USB db <dieterhansbritz@gmail.com> - 2023-02-20 16:41 +0100
Re: Short name for USB Gerald Gruner <gerald314@yahoo.de> - 2023-02-11 16:33 +0100
Re: Short name for USB "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-02-11 10:59 -0500
Re: Short name for USB The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-11 16:52 +0000
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-11 19:06 +0100
Re: Short name for USB "25B.R867" <25B.R867@noaaada.net> - 2023-02-14 00:53 -0500
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-14 12:46 +0100
Re: Short name for USB "25B.R867" <25B.R867@noaaada.net> - 2023-02-14 10:06 -0500
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-14 16:29 +0100
Re: Short name for USB "25B.R867" <25B.R867@noaaada.net> - 2023-02-15 01:05 -0500
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-15 12:27 +0100
Re: Short name for USB Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2023-02-14 14:07 +0000
Re: Short name for USB "25B.R867" <25B.R867@noaaada.net> - 2023-02-14 10:10 -0500
Re: Short name for USB Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2023-02-14 15:51 +0000
Re: Short name for USB "25B.R867" <25B.R867@noaaada.net> - 2023-02-15 00:57 -0500
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-15 12:29 +0100
Re: Short name for USB The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-15 12:07 +0000
Re: Short name for USB "25B.R867" <25B.R867@noaaada.net> - 2023-02-16 01:38 -0500
Re: Short name for USB The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-16 10:24 +0000
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-16 12:39 +0100
Re: Short name for USB The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-16 18:44 +0000
Re: Short name for USB "25B.R866" <25B.R866@noaaba.net> - 2023-02-18 00:29 -0500
Re: Short name for USB not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2023-02-19 09:23 +1000
Re: Short name for USB The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-19 11:41 +0000
Re: Short name for USB not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2023-02-20 08:41 +1000
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-19 12:53 +0100
Re: Short name for USB not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2023-02-20 08:46 +1000
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-20 02:55 +0100
Re: Short name for USB Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2023-02-20 12:07 +1000
Re: Short name for USB "25B.E866" <25B.E866@noaaba.net> - 2023-02-19 23:30 -0500
Re: Short name for USB Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2023-02-20 17:01 +1000
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-20 11:37 +0100
Re: Short name for USB The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-20 11:15 +0000
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-23 12:01 +0100
Re: Short name for USB The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-24 13:06 +0000
Re: Short name for USB The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-20 10:43 +0000
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-20 12:38 +0100
Re: Short name for USB not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2023-02-21 06:02 +1000
Re: Short name for USB The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-21 11:12 +0000
Re: Short name for USB not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2023-02-22 07:43 +1000
Re: Short name for USB The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-22 13:37 +0000
Re: Short name for USB The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-20 10:35 +0000
Re: Short name for USB The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-20 10:26 +0000
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-20 11:44 +0100
Re: Short name for USB The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-20 11:26 +0000
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-20 12:41 +0100
Re: Short name for USB "25B.R866" <25B.R866@noaaba.net> - 2023-02-18 00:25 -0500
Re: Short name for USB The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-18 10:04 +0000
Re: Short name for USB "25B.R866" <25B.R866@noaaba.net> - 2023-02-17 23:52 -0500
Re: Short name for USB "25B.R867" <25B.R867@noaaada.net> - 2023-02-16 01:36 -0500
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-16 12:45 +0100
Re: Short name for USB Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2023-02-16 18:11 +0000
Re: Short name for USB "25B.R866" <25B.R866@noaaba.net> - 2023-02-18 01:04 -0500
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-18 12:37 +0100
Re: Short name for USB "25B.R866" <25B.R866@noaaba.net> - 2023-02-18 23:11 -0500
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-19 13:03 +0100
Re: Short name for USB "25B.R866" <25B.R866@noaaba.net> - 2023-02-18 00:56 -0500
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-18 12:40 +0100
Re: Short name for USB "25B.E866" <25B.E866@noaaba.net> - 2023-02-19 21:28 -0500
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-20 11:28 +0100
Re: Short name for USB "25B.E866" <25B.E866@noaaba.net> - 2023-02-21 00:21 -0500
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-21 12:52 +0100
Re: Short name for USB The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-15 07:34 +0000
Re: Short name for USB The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-15 08:13 +0000
Re: Short name for USB "25B.R866" <25B.R866@noaaba.net> - 2023-02-18 01:39 -0500
Re: Short name for USB not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2023-02-12 08:01 +1000
Re: Short name for USB "25B.R866" <25B.R866@noaaba.net> - 2023-02-18 01:50 -0500
Re: Short name for USB The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-18 10:11 +0000
Re: Short name for USB "25B.R866" <25B.R866@noaaba.net> - 2023-02-18 23:08 -0500
Re: Short name for USB The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-19 11:53 +0000
Re: Short name for USB "25B.E866" <25B.E866@noaaba.net> - 2023-02-19 23:11 -0500
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-20 11:31 +0100
Re: Short name for USB Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2023-02-20 18:03 +0000
Re: Short name for USB The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-20 19:21 +0000
Re: Short name for USB "25B.E866" <25B.E866@noaaba.net> - 2023-02-20 23:57 -0500
Re: Short name for USB "25B.E866" <25B.E866@noaaba.net> - 2023-02-21 00:27 -0500
Re: Short name for USB The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-21 11:16 +0000
Re: Short name for USB "25B.E866" <25B.E866@noaaba.net> - 2023-02-22 01:23 -0500
Re: Short name for USB "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-02-19 13:04 +0100
Re: Short name for USB The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-19 14:11 +0000
Re: Short name for USB "25B.E866" <25B.E866@noaaba.net> - 2023-02-19 23:18 -0500
Re: Short name for USB The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-20 10:46 +0000
Re: Short name for USB "25B.E866" <25B.E866@noaaba.net> - 2023-02-20 22:15 -0500
csiph-web