Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #74653
| From | Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Favorite Font |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.misc |
| References | (4 earlier) <pan$4f5c8$f12b9163$46e2db5$f503da29@linux.rocks> <87wm5u9jh8.fsf@somewhere.edu> <68cec4ae$0$16841$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <pan$22d08$c7d3d6c5$93f27de1$98b75aed@linux.rocks> <68ceec3c$0$419$426a74cc@news.free.fr> |
| Message-Id | <pan$f146c$86520db6$e8d55afa$81b97306@linux.rocks> |
| Date | 2025-09-20 18:42 +0000 |
| Organization | UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 20 Sep 2025 18:02:36 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: >> >> I have tens of thousands of ebooks > > Speaking about nonsense, you are great with your answer. They are > useless: you couldn't have read them and you'll never read them. It's > impossible to read tens of thousand of book in a lifetime. > I have read a lot of them, and I will keep reading (and acquiring) more, but they are mostly for reference. If I need something I don't need to travel many miles to a major university library. > > That's clear nonsense. Solar or wind sources have environmental costs. > Like nuclear sources. The costs are not the same, but they exist. Do you > really believe you can create a nuclear central without any > environmental cost? Or a wind turbine without any material? Or a sonar > panel without any material? > The cost is SIGNIFICANTLY less that coal, oil, or gas fired plants. Idiot. > > Yes, print will fade over time, but I'll be long gone before the ink > will fade on the paper I used. > Not so with images. Furthermore, an adequately scanned image is far more versatile than a photo in a photo album. >> But e-material will stay fresh forever. > > Nonsense. First it depend on what you store them. If you are using > Compact Disks they wont leave more than a few year. The floppy disks had > an expected life way shorter. For an hard drive, I don't really know but > as it's magnetic, it can't stay forever. > Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! What a dufus! The implication is that digital files will always be duplicated on a regular basis. This practice will ensure extreme longevity. Eventually, digital archival storage technology will get better and better. Gutenberg is long dead. Digital is now the new king. -- Gentoo: the only road to GNU/Linux perfection.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Favorite Font Ethan Carter <ec1828@somewhere.edu> - 2025-09-19 19:16 -0300
Re: Favorite Font Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-20 00:33 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-09-20 08:58 -0400
Re: Favorite Font ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2025-09-20 13:51 +0000
Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-20 16:10 +0100
Re: Favorite Font Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-09-20 16:25 +0000
Re: Favorite Font ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2025-09-20 17:19 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-09-20 17:46 +0000
Re: Favorite Font John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-09-22 09:09 -0700
Re: Favorite Font Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-09-22 17:22 +0000
Re: Favorite Font rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-09-22 19:39 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-09-23 00:07 +0000
Re: Favorite Font "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-23 10:00 +0200
Re: Favorite Font rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-09-23 18:45 +0000
Re: Favorite Font "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-23 22:10 +0200
Re: Favorite Font Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-09-23 03:36 +0000
Re: Favorite Font rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-09-23 18:42 +0000
Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-23 12:31 +0100
Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-20 16:08 +0100
Re: Favorite Font Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-09-20 15:13 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-09-20 15:51 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-09-20 18:02 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-09-20 18:42 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-21 08:21 +0000
Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-21 10:34 +0100
Re: Favorite Font Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-21 22:53 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-22 07:42 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-22 22:53 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-23 07:35 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-09-21 15:26 +0000
Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-21 18:57 +0100
Re: Favorite Font Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-21 22:53 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-21 22:52 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-22 07:32 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-09-22 17:22 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-22 18:36 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-09-21 14:59 +0000
Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-21 16:15 +0100
Re: Favorite Font Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-09-21 20:19 +0000
Re: Favorite Font pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-09-23 01:16 +0000
Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-20 16:59 +0100
Re: Favorite Font Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-20 18:48 +0100
Re: Favorite Font Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-09-20 18:39 +0000
Re: Favorite Font not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-09-21 09:27 +1000
Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-21 09:45 +0100
Re: Favorite Font Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-09-20 18:18 +0000
Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-21 09:34 +0100
Re: Favorite Font Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-21 23:02 +0000
Re: Favorite Font chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-09-21 09:02 -0500
Re: Favorite Font Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-21 01:39 +0000
Re: Favorite Font vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-09-21 07:20 +0000
Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-21 10:14 +0100
Re: Favorite Font vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-09-21 22:31 +0000
Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-22 13:34 +0100
csiph-web