Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #74669

Re: Favorite Font

Message-ID <68cf3853@news.ausics.net> (permalink)
From not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev)
Subject Re: Favorite Font
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.misc
References (4 earlier) <pan$4f5c8$f12b9163$46e2db5$f503da29@linux.rocks> <87wm5u9jh8.fsf@somewhere.edu> <68cec4ae$0$16841$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <10amj0m$160hk$9@dont-email.me> <wwvv7ld10cb.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk>
Date 2025-09-21 09:27 +1000
Organization Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


In comp.os.linux.misc Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes:
>> On 20/09/2025 16:13, Stephane CARPENTIER wrote:
>>> It's important because people always believe that printing paper is bad
>>> for nature when using computer isn't. So, when you are reading an email,
>>> your computer is using electricity. And very few people manage their
>>> email by themselves, the emails are stored in Data Centers which rely
>>> heavily on electricity.
>>> So, to be short: reading something on your computer has the same
>>> impact
>>> on nature as printing it.
>>
>> A true ArtStudent(TM) statement.
>>
>> With no QUANTITATIVE analysis to back it up.
>>
>> First off, the email is stored in a data centre whether you read it on
>> screen or print it out.  And storage does not consume watts. Accessing
>> it does.
> 
> I'd expect online storage to consume at least some energy even when idle
> - though probably negligible for this particular discussion.

Surely negligible. The fact is that if each email used very much
electricity to store/process, it would be too expensive for
providers like Google to offer that service for free. Can you
imagine that happening if Google were obliged to print out every
email received in every GMail inbox?

Mind you I generally download my emails with POP, so they _don't_
stay in data centres permanently anyway. I very rarely print emails
out, but I do like doing that for longer documents since it's
easier to jump around a document in physical form, finding and
comparing different sections. I sometimes print out source code for
the same reason (as well as to allow for writing more flexible
notes and annotation).

-- 
__          __
#_ < |\| |< _#

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Favorite Font Ethan Carter <ec1828@somewhere.edu> - 2025-09-19 19:16 -0300
  Re: Favorite Font Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-20 00:33 +0000
    Re: Favorite Font Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-09-20 08:58 -0400
      Re: Favorite Font ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2025-09-20 13:51 +0000
        Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-20 16:10 +0100
        Re: Favorite Font Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-09-20 16:25 +0000
          Re: Favorite Font ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2025-09-20 17:19 +0000
        Re: Favorite Font Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-09-20 17:46 +0000
          Re: Favorite Font John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-09-22 09:09 -0700
            Re: Favorite Font Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-09-22 17:22 +0000
              Re: Favorite Font rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-09-22 19:39 +0000
                Re: Favorite Font Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-09-23 00:07 +0000
                Re: Favorite Font "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-23 10:00 +0200
                Re: Favorite Font rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-09-23 18:45 +0000
                Re: Favorite Font "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-23 22:10 +0200
                Re: Favorite Font Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-09-23 03:36 +0000
                Re: Favorite Font rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-09-23 18:42 +0000
            Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-23 12:31 +0100
      Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-20 16:08 +0100
  Re: Favorite Font Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-09-20 15:13 +0000
    Re: Favorite Font Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-09-20 15:51 +0000
      Re: Favorite Font Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-09-20 18:02 +0000
        Re: Favorite Font Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-09-20 18:42 +0000
          Re: Favorite Font Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-21 08:21 +0000
            Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-21 10:34 +0100
              Re: Favorite Font Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-21 22:53 +0000
                Re: Favorite Font Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-22 07:42 +0000
                Re: Favorite Font Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-22 22:53 +0000
                Re: Favorite Font Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-23 07:35 +0000
            Re: Favorite Font Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-09-21 15:26 +0000
              Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-21 18:57 +0100
                Re: Favorite Font Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-21 22:53 +0000
            Re: Favorite Font Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-21 22:52 +0000
              Re: Favorite Font Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-22 07:32 +0000
                Re: Favorite Font Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-09-22 17:22 +0000
                Re: Favorite Font Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-22 18:36 +0000
          Re: Favorite Font Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-09-21 14:59 +0000
            Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-21 16:15 +0100
            Re: Favorite Font Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-09-21 20:19 +0000
              Re: Favorite Font pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-09-23 01:16 +0000
    Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-20 16:59 +0100
      Re: Favorite Font Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-20 18:48 +0100
        Re: Favorite Font Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-09-20 18:39 +0000
        Re: Favorite Font not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-09-21 09:27 +1000
          Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-21 09:45 +0100
      Re: Favorite Font Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-09-20 18:18 +0000
        Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-21 09:34 +0100
          Re: Favorite Font Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-21 23:02 +0000
        Re: Favorite Font chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-09-21 09:02 -0500
      Re: Favorite Font Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-21 01:39 +0000
      Re: Favorite Font vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-09-21 07:20 +0000
        Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-21 10:14 +0100
          Re: Favorite Font vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-09-21 22:31 +0000
            Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-22 13:34 +0100

csiph-web