Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #74780
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Favorite Font |
| Date | 2025-09-21 22:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mjbcleFilmsU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <87wm5u9jh8.fsf@somewhere.edu> <68cec4ae$0$16841$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <10amj0m$160hk$9@dont-email.me> <mj9n9dF7of8U1@mid.individual.net> <10aoflf$1jd5c$10@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Sun, 21 Sep 2025 10:14:23 +0100, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote in <10aoflf$1jd5c$10@dont-email.me>: > On 21/09/2025 08:20, vallor wrote: >> On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 16:59:18 +0100, The Natural Philosopher >> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote in <10amj0m$160hk$9@dont-email.me>: >> >>> storage does not consume watts >> >> (reads statement) >> >> (looks at humming NAS) >> > Nut does not look at *actual* power consumption of said rust. > Nor go and look up the energy content of a piece of printed paper. > >> Oooookaaaaaay... >> >> (My NAS is a Synology Diskstation. The ones at the business are NetApp >> Filers...less email would mean less filers online, potentially with >> less spinning rust. Just sayin'...) >> >> > Most spinning rust is full of obsolete garbage which people cant be > bothered to throw away because once you need any storage at all, it is > no more expensive in energy to have shitloads. > > The amount of space I save by not having any files for important > paperwork, but instead storing them on a computer is worth far far more > than the trivial cost of running a couple of terabyte drives per annum. > > Let's Do Sums. > > I have 102 directories of 'stuff' in my main storage hierarchy, each one > with 5-10 subdirectories. > > Everything is in there, medical records,instruction manuals , guarantees > and service manuals > > I have at most 10 box files of paper, not 300+. > > Lets say that the two terabyte sized drives take 5W each on average,. > > That is 87600 watt hours or 87.6 units of electricity per year. perhaps > around £20 per annum. ($30 or near enough) > > Energy I need to burn *anyway* to have *any* access to computer storage > AT ALL. > > A box file would cost £2.20 for the most basic. > > so the cost of just the box files to store all that data would be in the > £660 range. And in order to store them I would need shelves and shelves, > like a lawyers office,all heated and kept dry at far far greater cost > and expensive. > > Now let's look at the paper. Each sheet cost about 0.5p which is broadly > a proxy for the energy in manufacturing it and getting it to me. > > The CHEAPEST cost quoted to print it out is 0.8 p and a colour printer > cost at least 20p or more. > > So each sheet of paper represents an outlay of at least 1,3p and maybe > up to 20p if its color. > > I receive 10 emails a day. so my cost is somewhere around 13-230p a day > or between £10 and £839 per year depending on the size of emails and > their color content. > > Now if I cost my physical storage out at something like £20 per square > meter per year - a very reasonable price - and I need a room of about 5 > x 1.5 meter to store my boxfile shelving, then I need to spend around > £150 a year to rent and maintain that... > > And of course if I want off site backup, another office somewhere > else.... > > NO WAY is keeping my files on a computer more energy intensive or > expensive than storing it all as paper. > > And yes, I was technical and financial director of several companies, > and that's how we made a profit. Doing BoringSums. > > And not acting like ArtStudents and making uneducated guesses and > calling them facts. I wasn't disagreeing with your overall point, just the point I quoted. Offline storage is one thing, but online storage is going to have a non-zero power cost. Just making Usenet conversation, carry on. :) -- -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090Ti 24G OS: Linux 6.16.8 D: Mint 22.2 DE: Xfce 4.18 NVIDIA: 580.82.09 Mem: 258G "You can't have everything...where would you put it?"
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Favorite Font Ethan Carter <ec1828@somewhere.edu> - 2025-09-19 19:16 -0300
Re: Favorite Font Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-20 00:33 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-09-20 08:58 -0400
Re: Favorite Font ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2025-09-20 13:51 +0000
Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-20 16:10 +0100
Re: Favorite Font Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-09-20 16:25 +0000
Re: Favorite Font ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2025-09-20 17:19 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-09-20 17:46 +0000
Re: Favorite Font John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-09-22 09:09 -0700
Re: Favorite Font Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-09-22 17:22 +0000
Re: Favorite Font rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-09-22 19:39 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-09-23 00:07 +0000
Re: Favorite Font "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-23 10:00 +0200
Re: Favorite Font rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-09-23 18:45 +0000
Re: Favorite Font "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-23 22:10 +0200
Re: Favorite Font Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-09-23 03:36 +0000
Re: Favorite Font rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-09-23 18:42 +0000
Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-23 12:31 +0100
Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-20 16:08 +0100
Re: Favorite Font Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-09-20 15:13 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-09-20 15:51 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-09-20 18:02 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-09-20 18:42 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-21 08:21 +0000
Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-21 10:34 +0100
Re: Favorite Font Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-21 22:53 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-22 07:42 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-22 22:53 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-23 07:35 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-09-21 15:26 +0000
Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-21 18:57 +0100
Re: Favorite Font Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-21 22:53 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-21 22:52 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-22 07:32 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-09-22 17:22 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-22 18:36 +0000
Re: Favorite Font Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-09-21 14:59 +0000
Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-21 16:15 +0100
Re: Favorite Font Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-09-21 20:19 +0000
Re: Favorite Font pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-09-23 01:16 +0000
Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-20 16:59 +0100
Re: Favorite Font Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-20 18:48 +0100
Re: Favorite Font Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-09-20 18:39 +0000
Re: Favorite Font not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-09-21 09:27 +1000
Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-21 09:45 +0100
Re: Favorite Font Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-09-20 18:18 +0000
Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-21 09:34 +0100
Re: Favorite Font Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-21 23:02 +0000
Re: Favorite Font chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-09-21 09:02 -0500
Re: Favorite Font Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-21 01:39 +0000
Re: Favorite Font vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-09-21 07:20 +0000
Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-21 10:14 +0100
Re: Favorite Font vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-09-21 22:31 +0000
Re: Favorite Font The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-22 13:34 +0100
csiph-web