Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #60064
| Subject | Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.misc, alt.os.linux |
| References | (13 earlier) <vffdl3$32jvk$1@dont-email.me> <mCQSO.297923$EEm7.159455@fx16.iad> <vfgual$3aojk$1@dont-email.me> <pn_SO.297937$EEm7.97193@fx16.iad> <lo3dhuFo19fU1@mid.individual.net> |
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
| Organization | wokiesux |
| Date | 2024-10-26 03:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ibadnWB9Sol0A4H6nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@earthlink.com> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 10/26/24 1:38 AM, rbowman wrote: > On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 04:38:45 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > >> On 2024-10-25, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote: >> >>> There would not be a line on the requisition "Must know Microsoft >>> Office", >>> which is a popular bit of silliness. >> >> Then there were the ads in 1997 calling for people with 5 years' >> experience in Windows 95... > > My favorites were the ads in the Boston Sunday Globe in the early '80s > looking for several years of Ada experience. At the time there wasn't a > working Ada compiler. > > We never paid attention to the ads HR would place for programmers until > one interviewee asked about the requirements like 'able to run copier' > that they had cut'n'pasted from their office drone template. Hilarious ! Only programmers know programming. All other pretenders just fuck it up. LOTS of pretenders these days. Makes 'em FEEL important though ! Oh, I wonder how many DID claim years of experience with the non-existent DOD Ada compiler ??? The Bosses would not have had a CLUE ........ :-)
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lester Thorpe <lt@gnu.rocks> - 2024-10-21 19:07 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Phillip Frabott <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2024-10-22 07:44 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-10-22 08:32 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-22 13:34 +0100
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Phillip Frabott <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2024-10-22 09:15 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-10-22 09:18 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-22 14:25 +0100
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-10-22 10:51 -0400
{OT) Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-10-22 18:02 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Donald Trump <Donald@trump.com> - 2024-10-22 22:50 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-10-22 19:49 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-23 00:02 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-10-22 20:28 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-23 04:39 +0000
{OT illegal-alien} ...was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-10-23 07:23 -0400
Re: {OT illegal-alien} ...was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-10-23 07:31 -0400
Re: {OT illegal-alien} ...was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-10-23 13:15 -0400
Re: {OT illegal-alien} ...was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-10-25 05:43 -0400
Re: {OT illegal-alien} ...was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-10-25 17:33 -0400
Re: {OT illegal-alien} ...was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-25 22:47 +0100
Re: {OT illegal-alien} ...was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-10-25 18:09 -0400
Re: {OT illegal-alien} ...was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-26 01:07 +0100
Re: {OT illegal-alien} ...was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-10-25 20:38 -0400
Re: {OT illegal-alien} ...was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-26 06:38 +0000
Re: {OT illegal-alien} ...was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-10-26 08:33 -0400
Re: {OT illegal-alien} ...was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-26 01:10 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-10-23 10:11 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-10-22 20:34 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-10-23 10:05 +0200
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-10-23 13:01 -0400
Re: Left vs Wrong (was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-23 21:29 +0000
Re: Left vs Wrong (was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security) CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-10-23 21:17 -0400
Re: Left vs Wrong (was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-24 03:48 +0000
{OT} was...Re: Left vs Wrong (was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security) bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-10-24 07:31 -0400
Re: {OT} was...Re: Left vs Wrong (was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-24 12:40 +0100
Re: {OT} was...Re: Left vs Wrong (was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security) CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-10-24 09:10 -0400
Re: Left vs Wrong (was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-24 22:26 +0000
Re: {OT} was...Re: Left vs Wrong (was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security) bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-10-24 09:45 -0400
Re: {OT} was...Re: Left vs Wrong (was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-24 14:58 +0100
Re: {OT} was...Re: Left vs Wrong (was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security) CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-10-24 11:39 -0400
Re: {OT} was...Re: Left vs Wrong (was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security) bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-10-24 12:48 -0400
Re: {OT} was...Re: Left vs Wrong (was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-10-25 05:56 -0400
Re: Left vs Wrong (was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-24 22:25 +0000
{OT} was was bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-10-25 08:28 -0400
Re: Left vs Wrong Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-26 20:42 +0000
Re: Left vs Wrong Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-10-27 02:06 +0000
Re: Left vs Wrong Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-27 02:22 +0000
Re: Left vs Wrong Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-10-27 07:42 -0400
Re: Left vs Wrong Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2024-10-27 09:17 -0300
Re: Left vs Wrong bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-10-27 13:07 -0400
Bethlehem; [was Re: Left vs Wrong] Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2024-10-29 03:57 +0000
Re: Left vs Wrong Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-10-27 07:38 -0400
Re: {OT} was...Re: Left vs Wrong (was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security) CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-10-24 09:07 -0400
Re: {OT} was...Re: Left vs Wrong (was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2024-10-24 14:31 -0300
Re: {OT} was...Re: Left vs Wrong (was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-10-24 14:14 -0400
Re: {OT} was...Re: Left vs Wrong (was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2024-10-24 15:34 -0300
Migrant Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2024-10-25 05:59 +0200
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-23 00:00 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-10-22 20:21 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-10-26 03:32 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-10-26 19:27 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-26 23:43 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-10-26 19:58 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-10-23 06:48 +1000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-22 23:59 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-10-22 16:57 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> - 2024-10-24 02:48 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-10-22 09:17 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security John McCue <jmccue@magnetar.jmcunx.com> - 2024-10-22 14:05 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-22 17:37 +0100
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-10-22 16:57 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Phillip Frabott <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2024-10-23 08:24 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-10-23 09:07 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security John McCue <jmccue@magnetar.jmcunx.com> - 2024-10-23 13:57 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-23 20:42 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2024-10-25 06:03 +0200
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-10-25 11:28 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-22 20:47 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-10-22 18:03 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-10-22 19:36 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-22 23:57 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-10-22 20:19 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-23 00:45 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-10-22 21:17 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-23 01:46 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-10-23 10:06 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-23 21:27 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> - 2024-10-24 03:25 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-10-24 08:57 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-24 20:40 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-10-24 11:56 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-10-24 13:30 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-10-24 16:44 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-24 22:23 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-10-25 00:05 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-25 04:37 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-10-25 08:47 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-26 20:41 +0000
{OT} was Re: bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-10-26 18:34 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-27 02:20 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Donald Trump <Donald@trump.com> - 2024-10-25 04:45 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-10-25 02:25 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-10-25 17:32 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-10-25 16:16 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-10-26 04:38 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-26 05:38 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-10-26 03:48 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-25 22:22 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-25 22:21 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-10-26 00:48 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-10-25 06:57 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-10-23 03:07 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-23 09:01 +0100
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-24 04:48 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-24 18:48 +0100
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-24 22:19 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-10-25 18:10 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-25 19:36 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-25 22:13 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-10-25 15:39 -0700
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-25 23:43 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-10-28 03:20 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-28 09:39 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-10-28 13:40 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-10-28 11:29 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-10-28 18:10 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-28 22:31 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-29 00:03 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-10-28 21:41 +0100
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-28 21:20 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-10-28 11:09 +0100
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-29 01:28 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-29 02:33 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-10-29 03:47 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-29 04:52 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-29 05:58 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-10-29 18:35 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-29 07:19 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-10-29 13:27 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-29 20:44 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-26 01:08 +0100
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-26 02:37 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-26 05:45 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-26 05:51 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-10-26 03:01 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-26 11:01 +0100
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-10-26 12:21 +0200
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-10-27 00:28 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-10-27 00:25 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-10-26 18:01 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-26 23:27 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-27 01:44 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-27 10:13 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-10-27 17:11 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-27 21:16 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-10-27 22:32 +0100
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-28 09:06 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-10-28 11:13 +0100
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-28 21:18 +0000
As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2024-10-26 13:25 -0700
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-10-27 02:06 +0000
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-27 02:21 +0000
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-10-27 01:35 -0400
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-10-27 11:00 +0100
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-27 10:28 +0000
The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy). "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2024-10-27 04:18 -0700
Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy). The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-27 11:32 +0000
We're in the middle, always. "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2024-10-27 06:23 -0700
Re: We're in the middle, always. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-27 13:30 +0000
Who you are, where you are, when you are. "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2024-10-27 07:07 -0700
Re: Who you are, where you are, when you are. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-27 14:51 +0000
Re: We're in the middle, always. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-27 17:25 +0000
Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy). rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-27 17:22 +0000
Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy). Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-27 21:21 +0000
Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy). Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-27 21:19 +0000
Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy). Don_from_AZ <djatechNOSPAM@comcast.net.invalid> - 2024-10-27 19:47 -0700
Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy). The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-28 09:37 +0000
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-10-27 22:34 +0100
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-10-28 00:48 -0400
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-28 09:32 +0000
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-10-28 11:10 +0100
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-10-28 17:35 -0400
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-28 22:37 +0000
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-29 02:27 +0000
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-10-29 11:32 +0100
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-28 09:12 +0000
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-10-28 11:22 +0100
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-28 10:32 +0000
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-10-28 21:47 +0100
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-28 21:31 +0000
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-10-28 16:22 +0000
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-27 10:25 +0000
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-27 10:25 +0000
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-27 17:28 +0000
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-10-28 00:37 -0400
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-28 09:41 +0000
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-10-28 19:12 -0400
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-29 07:17 +0000
Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . . Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-27 20:54 +0000
Whether it's enough or not depends on what kind of a being you might be. "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2024-10-29 06:56 -0700
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-10-27 20:46 -0500
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-28 09:33 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-10-28 09:48 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-10-28 12:32 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-28 21:33 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-29 01:45 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-26 09:56 +0100
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-26 23:27 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-10-25 01:09 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-25 22:17 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-10-26 03:19 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Phillip Frabott <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2024-10-23 08:36 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-10-25 02:48 -0400
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lester Thorpe <lt@gnu.rocks> - 2024-10-24 18:53 +0000
Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-10-25 02:58 -0400
csiph-web