Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #675240

Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security

Subject	Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.misc, alt.os.linux
References	(13 earlier) <vffdl3$32jvk$1@dont-email.me> <mCQSO.297923$EEm7.159455@fx16.iad> <vfgual$3aojk$1@dont-email.me> <pn_SO.297937$EEm7.97193@fx16.iad> <lo3dhuFo19fU1@mid.individual.net>
From	"186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net>
Organization	wokiesux
Date	2024-10-26 03:48 -0400
Message-ID	<ibadnWB9Sol0A4H6nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@earthlink.com> (permalink)

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/26/24 1:38 AM, rbowman wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 04:38:45 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> 
>> On 2024-10-25, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> There would not be a line on the requisition "Must know Microsoft
>>> Office",
>>> which is a popular bit of silliness.
>>
>> Then there were the ads in 1997 calling for people with 5 years'
>> experience in Windows 95...
> 
> My favorites were the ads in the Boston Sunday Globe in the early '80s
> looking for several years of Ada experience. At the time there wasn't a
> working Ada compiler.
> 
> We never paid attention to the ads HR would place for programmers until
> one interviewee asked about the requirements like 'able to run copier'
> that they had cut'n'pasted from their office drone template.


   Hilarious !

   Only programmers know programming. All other pretenders
   just fuck it up. LOTS of pretenders these days.

   Makes 'em FEEL important though !

   Oh, I wonder how many DID claim years of experience
   with the non-existent DOD Ada compiler ??? The Bosses
   would not have had a CLUE ........  :-)

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-10-23 10:06 -0400
  Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-23 21:27 +0000
  Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> - 2024-10-24 03:25 +0000
    Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-10-24 08:57 -0400
      Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-24 20:40 +0000
  Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-10-24 11:56 -0400
    Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-10-24 13:30 -0400
      Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-10-24 16:44 -0400
        Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-24 22:23 +0000
          Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-10-25 00:05 -0400
            Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-25 04:37 +0000
              Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-10-25 08:47 -0400
                Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-26 20:41 +0000
                {OT} was Re: bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-10-26 18:34 -0400
                Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-27 02:20 +0000
          Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Donald Trump <Donald@trump.com> - 2024-10-25 04:45 +0000
          Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-10-25 02:25 -0400
            Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-10-25 17:32 +0000
              Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-10-25 16:16 -0400
                Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-10-26 04:38 +0000
                Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-26 05:38 +0000
                Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-10-26 03:48 -0400
              Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-25 22:22 +0000
            Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-25 22:21 +0000
        Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-10-25 06:57 -0400

csiph-web