Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #173489
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
In alt.usenet.kooks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 4/14/13 4:38 PM, in article kkfel3$70c$1@reader1.panix.com, "Gary
> Burnore" <gburnore@panix.com> wrote:
>
>> In alt.usenet.kooks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 4/14/13 4:02 PM, in article kkfcha$8kn$1@reader1.panix.com, "Gary
>>> Burnore" <gburnore@panix.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In alt.usenet.kooks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> I miss him.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Has all become clear now?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I used to be a cola nut, till I came to my senses.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Does not mean you are not still a nut in COLA, you might just be a
>>>>> different
>>>>> type. :)
>>>>>
>>>>>> I now use win7 on a nice high powered PC. Very nice indeed. I've had too
>>>>>> many problems with linux and just got tired of going on one of those
>>>>>> scavenger hunts hunting down missing libraries.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I think the bottom line is different solutions fit different needs and
>>>>> tastes
>>>>> best. I personally use OS X, Windows, and Linux (used them all today, in
>>>>> fact). Just depends on what is going to serve me best. I think anyone who
>>>>> tells you Solution X [1] is always best is trying to sell you something.
>>>>
>>>> Liar.
>>>
>>> While I know you will never give an honest answer, I am curious why you go so
>>> far out of your way to place yourself in a poor light.
>>
>> No, k00k, you don't or you'd stop. That is, after all, why you are where you
>> are.
>>
>> Remember, you're ignoring me.
>
> Thank you for making it clear:
That you're a kook and you're home, yes, I've made that quite clear more than
once. Do enjoy your stay.
--
gburnore at Panix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ?????????????????????????????????
| ?????????????????????????????????
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| ?????????????????????????????????
| ?? 0 1 7 2 3 / ??? 3 7 4 9 3 0 o?
Bronx Division | Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
"Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 10:26 -0700
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2013-04-12 21:17 -0400
"Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 18:29 -0700
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 18:37 -0700
Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 19:51 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 20:19 -0700
Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 22:22 -0700
Anything that posts only to draw attention to itself, and crossposts to five unrelated newsgroups should be SHIT CANNED WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE. Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-12 23:43 -0700
Re: Anything that posts only to draw attention to itself, and crossposts to five unrelated newsgroups should be SHIT CANNED WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE. Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 00:00 -0700
Thank you ( Mark⋅S⋅Bilk, a Google Groups user ) for reading my posts. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 08:30 -0700
Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-13 08:48 -0700
Re: Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 15:57 +0000
Re: Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-13 10:46 -0600
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 09:53 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2013-04-13 17:52 +0000
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:03 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 11:17 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:25 +0000
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:43 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? I Bought DataBasix <owner@databasix.com> - 2013-04-13 14:52 -0400
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 12:53 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:05 +0000
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:24 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:27 +0000
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 12:07 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 19:09 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 12:07 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? benj <benj@iwaynet.net> - 2013-04-13 14:27 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 16:01 +0000
Lame, meaningless insults: "fucking coward", "kook" and "liar". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 09:28 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 09:56 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 17:36 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:00 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:07 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:23 -0700
Usenet is NOT "pure text". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 13:19 -0700
Re: Usenet is NOT "pure text". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 13:42 -0700
Re: Usenet is NOT "pure text". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 20:51 +0000
Usenet is a form of email. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 10:43 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 10:45 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:33 -0500
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 16:39 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? " Sir Gregory Hall, Esq·" <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 19:45 -0400
[NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Hawkeye-X <teslerd@gmail.con> - 2013-04-13 19:56 -0600
Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 02:41 +0000
Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 22:43 -0400
Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 02:47 +0000
Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 22:59 -0400
Mr. "Hawkeye-X" has no idea if my posts specify colors or not. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 20:21 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:01 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:09 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:22 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:26 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 12:05 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 19:11 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 22:27 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 18:29 -0400
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 23:01 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2013-04-13 22:55 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 23:02 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 15:55 -0700
What is the name of Microsoft's latest email client for Office (OS⋅X) ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:17 -0700
Re: What is the name of Microsoft's latest email client for Office (OS⋅X) ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 16:32 -0700
I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 17:53 -0700
Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 17:55 -0700
Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:09 -0700
Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses. ?? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 19:30 -0700
Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:08 -0700
Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 15:44 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana". Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 18:51 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 15:54 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2013-04-14 03:44 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 20:57 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 14:48 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 09:17 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-04-14 17:26 +0100
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 09:37 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-14 10:47 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 16:29 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-14 10:44 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 15:50 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-14 21:34 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 14:45 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 18:57 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 14:47 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-14 09:33 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. cipher <cipher@nospamforme.org> - 2013-04-15 00:13 +0000
Mozilla Thunderbird isn't "dead". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-14 21:00 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:22 -0500
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 16:50 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 20:52 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2013-04-13 14:06 -0700
I see at least 4 problems with the way ChrisV ranks nyms. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 20:08 -0700
I'm tempted to auto⋅morph as I reply to every "chrisv" post. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:31 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-13 15:27 -0600
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 17:31 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-14 10:18 -0600
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 15:19 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-14 16:29 -0600
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 18:56 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:02 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-15 09:55 -0600
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-15 10:24 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:00 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:02 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:18 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:38 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:41 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:43 +0000
Mr. "Snit", │A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:56 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", â‰≠A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 17:08 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:30 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:06 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 01:11 +0000
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 12:06 +0000
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 18:33 -0700
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? " Sir Gregory Hall, Esq$B!&\(B" <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 10:04 -0400
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-12 21:37 -0400
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:28 -0500
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? imp@ster.invalid ( Ï M Poster) - 2013-04-13 21:47 +0100
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-04-13 23:36 +0000
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 16:46 -0700
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:32 +0000
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:31 +0000
Dr. Unruh, "eternal-september" noobs can't see my posts. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 18:14 -0700
Re: Dr. Unruh, "eternal-september" noobs can't see my posts. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:21 -0700
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-15 07:25 -0500
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-15 09:37 -0700
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-15 14:07 -0400
Publically plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-15 11:55 -0700
Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move. Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-15 15:09 -0400
Re: Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move. "51%" <51%@yay.net.ru> - 2013-04-16 19:36 +1000
Re: Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move. ?? none of your buisiness <none@none.com> - 2013-04-16 12:15 -0400
csiph-web