Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #35320
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android |
| Subject | Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall |
| Date | 2016-10-15 13:49 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <e6djpcFagn1U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <141020161157328893%nospam@nospam.invalid> <58011764$0$61800$c3e8da3$e074e489@news.astraweb.com> <ntrafr$19d$5@gioia.aioe.org> <e6d9cqF8cpaU1@mid.individual.net> <54vd6hkgjvkj.1t2skuj6yxxps$.dlg@40tude.net> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> wrote > Rod Speed wrote >> take this as an unproven assumption. >> It is in fact just plain wrong, nothing to do with any assumption. > Conjecture, conjecture: he didn't mean assumption, he meant conjecture. Correct. > Might be right, might be wrong, no one's trying to defend > it, and it's not claimed it follows from any assumption. > Better now? Nope.
Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Enzo Dubois <EnzoDubois2@bouyguestelecom.fr> - 2016-10-11 02:36 +0200
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-10 21:43 -0400
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 08:15 +0000
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-11 13:03 -0400
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Adrian Caspersz <email@here.invalid> - 2016-10-13 23:00 +0100
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 04:44 +1100
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-11 22:49 +0000
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Algeria Horan <algeriahoran@algeriahoran.net> - 2016-10-11 22:57 +0000
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-11 22:29 -0400
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 17:31 +1100
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2016-10-12 09:30 +0100
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-12 11:40 -0400
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Algeria Horan <algeriahoran@algeriahoran.net> - 2016-10-12 19:11 +0000
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2016-10-12 20:38 +0100
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Algeria Horan <algeriahoran@algeriahoran.net> - 2016-10-12 21:14 +0000
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2016-10-12 19:58 +0200
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-12 14:21 -0400
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-12 20:23 +0000
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-12 16:43 -0400
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2016-10-12 21:50 +0100
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-13 06:32 +0000
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-13 02:55 -0400
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-13 08:23 +0000
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-13 19:34 +1100
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-13 07:45 -0400
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2016-10-13 06:19 -0700
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-13 11:22 -0400
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 03:55 +1100
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-14 02:37 -0400
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 20:12 +1100
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-14 11:57 -0400
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-14 13:35 -0400
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Algeria Horan <algeriahoran@algeriahoran.net> - 2016-10-14 19:08 +0000
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 10:51 +1100
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-10-14 21:47 -0400
Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 13:49 +1100
csiph-web