Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.mobile.android > #35291

Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall

From "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Newsgroups misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android
Subject Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall
Date 2016-10-13 19:34 +1100
Message-ID <e68vl1F75ivU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <nthc71$1po9$1@adenine.netfront.net> <nti73u$kck$2@dont-email.me> <e67btcFq5v6U3@mid.individual.net> <121020161421440132%nospam@nospam.invalid> <57ff2ffd$0$31230$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote
> nospam wrote

>> it will definitely hurt, but they'll recover, especially since they
>> make other products than just phones, such as washing machines.

> The danger here is that they will be off the market long enough for 
> someone
> else to come in and become the "defactor" standard Android phone.

Not a chance with as competitive a market as with android phones.

> Google is coming out with its Pixel.

But it remains to be seen if they do any better than their Nexuses.

> And On Oct 20th, Kodak is rumoured to come
> out with a new high end camera phone.

Which will fly like the proverbial lead balloon, you watch.

> LG and Huawei, HTC and Xiaomi might also get
> a chance to get some of Samsung's market share

They have done for years now.

> (as would Apple).

Not a chance.

> It all depends on how long it takes for Samsung to come
> out with a "new and improved (and renamed) phone.

They already have that, the Galaxy S* line.

> Note: some chinese site looked at the problem and found that
> the casing is too shallow, and when it is closed by machines, it risks
> pressing a corner of battery, causing some of the leads to short.

Hard to believe that Samsung can't work that out if it really is the 
problem.

> So if Samsung redesigns the battery to fit "comfortably",
> it may have reduced autonomy since it would have less
> capacity. (probably nothing substantial though).
 

Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Enzo Dubois <EnzoDubois2@bouyguestelecom.fr> - 2016-10-11 02:36 +0200
  Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-10 21:43 -0400
  Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 08:15 +0000
    Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-11 13:03 -0400
      Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Adrian Caspersz <email@here.invalid> - 2016-10-13 23:00 +0100
    Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 04:44 +1100
    Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-11 22:49 +0000
      Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Algeria Horan <algeriahoran@algeriahoran.net> - 2016-10-11 22:57 +0000
    Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-11 22:29 -0400
      Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 17:31 +1100
      Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2016-10-12 09:30 +0100
        Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-12 11:40 -0400
        Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Algeria Horan <algeriahoran@algeriahoran.net> - 2016-10-12 19:11 +0000
          Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2016-10-12 20:38 +0100
            Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Algeria Horan <algeriahoran@algeriahoran.net> - 2016-10-12 21:14 +0000
    Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2016-10-12 19:58 +0200
      Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-12 14:21 -0400
        Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-12 20:23 +0000
          Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-12 16:43 -0400
          Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2016-10-12 21:50 +0100
            Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-13 06:32 +0000
        Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-13 02:55 -0400
          Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-13 08:23 +0000
          Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-13 19:34 +1100
          Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-13 07:45 -0400
            Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2016-10-13 06:19 -0700
              Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-13 11:22 -0400
              Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 03:55 +1100
            Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-14 02:37 -0400
              Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 20:12 +1100
              Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-14 11:57 -0400
                Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-14 13:35 -0400
                Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Algeria Horan <algeriahoran@algeriahoran.net> - 2016-10-14 19:08 +0000
                Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 10:51 +1100
                Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-10-14 21:47 -0400
                Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 13:49 +1100

csiph-web