Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall

From	"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android
Subject	Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall
Date	2016-10-14 03:55 +1100
Message-ID	<e69sjtFe2u8U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <e67btcFq5v6U3@mid.individual.net> <121020161421440132%nospam@nospam.invalid> <57ff2ffd$0$31230$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com> <131020160745498817%nospam@nospam.invalid> <201610130619141669-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote 
> nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote
>> JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote

>>>> it will definitely hurt, but they'll recover, especially 
>>>> since they make other products than just phones, 
>>>> such as washing machines.
 
> One would hope their container ships don't burst into flames.

Dunno, given a significant over supply of them currently, presumably
some of the owners of them hope that some of theirs do, when insured. 

Going to be interesting to see who helps theirs to do that. 
 
>>> The danger here is that they will be off the market 
>>> long enough for someone else to come in and 
>>> become the "defactor" standard Android phone.
 
>> maybe, but probably not.
 
>>> Google is coming out with its Pixel. And On Oct 20th, Kodak 
>>> is rumoured to come out with a new high end camera phone.  
>>> LG and Huawei, HTC and Xiaomi might also get a chance to 
>>> get some of Samsung's market share (as would Apple).
 
> I have heard some good things regarding Huawei, particularly 
> the camera in their P9/P9 Plus. It seems they got to the "twin 
> rear camera" concept ahead of Apple back in May.
> <http://consumer.huawei.com/en/mobile-phones/p9/index.html>
> <http://petapixel.com/2016/05/31/review-huawei-p9-phone-camera/>
 
>> kodak recently released a super-8 movie camera that takes super-8
>> *film*, so i doubt a smartphone from them would be all that compelling.
 
> A Kodak phone taking 110 film would be quaint. ;-)

>>> It all depends on how long it takes for Samsung to come 
>>> out with a "new and improved (and renamed) phone.
 
>> it won't be that long, it will just need a new name.

> The "Super Nova".

Down, boy.

Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Enzo Dubois <EnzoDubois2@bouyguestelecom.fr> - 2016-10-11 02:36 +0200
  Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-10 21:43 -0400
  Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 08:15 +0000
    Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-11 13:03 -0400
      Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Adrian Caspersz <email@here.invalid> - 2016-10-13 23:00 +0100
    Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 04:44 +1100
    Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-11 22:49 +0000
      Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Algeria Horan <algeriahoran@algeriahoran.net> - 2016-10-11 22:57 +0000
    Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-11 22:29 -0400
      Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 17:31 +1100
      Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2016-10-12 09:30 +0100
        Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-12 11:40 -0400
        Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Algeria Horan <algeriahoran@algeriahoran.net> - 2016-10-12 19:11 +0000
          Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2016-10-12 20:38 +0100
            Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Algeria Horan <algeriahoran@algeriahoran.net> - 2016-10-12 21:14 +0000
    Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2016-10-12 19:58 +0200
      Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-12 14:21 -0400
        Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-12 20:23 +0000
          Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-12 16:43 -0400
          Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2016-10-12 21:50 +0100
            Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-13 06:32 +0000
        Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-13 02:55 -0400
          Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-13 08:23 +0000
          Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-13 19:34 +1100
          Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-13 07:45 -0400
            Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2016-10-13 06:19 -0700
              Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-13 11:22 -0400
              Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 03:55 +1100
            Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-14 02:37 -0400
              Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 20:12 +1100
              Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-14 11:57 -0400
                Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-14 13:35 -0400
                Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Algeria Horan <algeriahoran@algeriahoran.net> - 2016-10-14 19:08 +0000
                Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 10:51 +1100
                Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-10-14 21:47 -0400
                Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 13:49 +1100

csiph-web