Groups > misc.phone.mobile.iphone > #94132

Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall

From	"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android
Subject	Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall
Date	2016-10-15 10:51 +1100
Message-ID	<e6d9cqF8cpaU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <131020160745498817%nospam@nospam.invalid> <58007d3f$0$65197$b1db1813$15bdbe48@news.astraweb.com> <141020161157328893%nospam@nospam.invalid> <58011764$0$61800$c3e8da3$e074e489@news.astraweb.com> <ntrafr$19d$5@gioia.aioe.org>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


"Algeria Horan" <algeriahoran@algeriahoran.net> wrote in message 
news:ntrafr$19d$5@gioia.aioe.org...
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:35:31 -0400, JF Mezei wrote:
>
>> Yes. Corporations have lawyers and lawyers will tell them to never admit
>> knowing about a defect (at which point damage against corporation become
>> much higher if management knew of problem and didn't take action to fix
>> it right away).
>
> No lawyer called me up to agree with you but I do agree with you.
>
> Once a valued employee had an altercation at an office parking lot my
> company rented in another state, and they *had* to fire him. Not because
> the altercation had anything whatsoever to do with work (it was with his
> wife).
>
> The altercation happenend on company (rented) property. Period.
>
> He told me that HR said he could never be hired again, and since he had
> friends in HR, they told him (he says) that the lawyers won't let them.
>
> The reason is that if ever in the future, he has another altercation,
> they knew (or should have known) he was prone to that behavior.

That is just another bare faced lawyers lie. There is no such legal 
requirement.

> Back to the Note 7, I suspect the lawyers argued
> to kill it perhaps at least partly for similar reasons.

More fool you.

> If ever, in the future, another Note 7 burst into flames,
> they knew, or should have known, that it could.

Just as true of any device with a battery that uses that technology.

They haven't all been banned world wide by all manufacturers, anyway.

> Bingo for the lawyers.

> NOTE: I'm just hypothesizing so, take this as an unproven assumption.

It is in fact just plain wrong, nothing to do with any assumption.

Back to misc.phone.mobile.iphone | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Enzo Dubois <EnzoDubois2@bouyguestelecom.fr> - 2016-10-11 02:36 +0200
  Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-10 21:43 -0400
  Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 08:15 +0000
    Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-11 13:03 -0400
      Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Adrian Caspersz <email@here.invalid> - 2016-10-13 23:00 +0100
    Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 04:44 +1100
    Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-11 22:49 +0000
      Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Algeria Horan <algeriahoran@algeriahoran.net> - 2016-10-11 22:57 +0000
    Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-11 22:29 -0400
      Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 17:31 +1100
    Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2016-10-12 19:58 +0200
      Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-12 14:21 -0400
        Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-12 20:23 +0000
          Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-12 16:43 -0400
          Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2016-10-12 21:50 +0100
            Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-13 06:32 +0000
        Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-13 02:55 -0400
          Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-13 08:23 +0000
          Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-13 19:34 +1100
          Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-13 07:45 -0400
            Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2016-10-13 06:19 -0700
              Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-13 11:22 -0400
              Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 03:55 +1100
            Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-14 02:37 -0400
              Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 20:12 +1100
              Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-14 11:57 -0400
                Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-14 13:35 -0400
                Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall Algeria Horan <algeriahoran@algeriahoran.net> - 2016-10-14 19:08 +0000
                Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 10:51 +1100
                Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-10-14 21:47 -0400
                Re: Samsung just recalled the Galaxy Note 7 without using the word recall "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 13:49 +1100

csiph-web