Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.misc > #28575

Re: Is this where we are going with AI?

Show all headers | View raw

On 2026-05-13, Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> wrote:
> On 2026-05-12, Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote:
>> Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> wrote:
> ....snip....
>>> It could be, of course that he'd have got no
>>> further by entering into a conversation with
>>> humans on a bulletin board, or indeed here
>>> on usenet. I have no way of knowing.
>>> 
>>> I reckon to use one of these tools well, you
>>> already need to be somewhat of an expert in
>>> the area of discussion - so you can spot the
>>> hallucinations and where it is off the mark.
>> 
>> Even then they still describe their
>> hallucinations in dangerously convincing ways,
>> wrapping them with lots of irrelevent but
>> correct facts from elsewhere. More misleading
>> than any response from a human, who would
>> never work that hard to sell such lies in an
>> unimportant online discussion.
> 
> An aspect That hadn't occurred to me! Thanks.
> 
> Though of course that ignores the trolls that
> often go out of their way to mislead. Which
> begs the question: Are AIs trolls, but aren't
> aware of it?

Looks like *someone* is still deluded that
what they call things is what they are....

-- 
v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v
| alt.troll.adam-h-kerman: proof that the |
| internet sometimes gets something right |
^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^

Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Is this where we are going with AI? Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-05-12 18:26 +0000
  Re: Is this where we are going with AI? none <none@none.rip> - 2026-05-12 20:49 +0200
    Re: Is this where we are going with AI? oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> - 2026-05-13 00:07 +0000
      Re: Is this where we are going with AI? none <none@none.rip> - 2026-05-13 02:28 +0200
        Re: Is this where we are going with AI? oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> - 2026-05-13 02:58 +0000
  Re: Is this where we are going with AI? ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2026-05-12 18:56 +0000
    Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-05-12 19:19 +0000
  Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2026-05-12 20:10 +0100
    Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-05-12 19:17 +0000
      Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2026-05-12 20:32 +0100
  Re: Is this where we are going with AI? none <none@none.rip> - 2026-05-12 21:52 +0200
  Re: Is this where we are going with AI? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-05-13 08:12 +1000
    Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-05-13 09:48 +0000
      Re: Is this where we are going with AI? oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> - 2026-05-13 12:18 +0000
      Re: Is this where we are going with AI? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-05-14 08:52 +1000
  Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Adrian Caspersz <email@here.invalid> - 2026-05-13 20:48 +0100
    Re: Is this where we are going with AI? none <none@none.rip> - 2026-05-13 21:59 +0200
  Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Oregonian Haruspex <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2026-05-13 21:46 +0000
    Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-05-14 08:52 +0000

csiph-web