Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Is this where we are going with AI? |
| Date | 2026-05-13 00:07 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <slrn1107g5k.b1e.oldernow@oldernow.jethrick.com> (permalink) |
| References | <slrn1106s7d.2gf.jj@iridium.wf32df> <10tvsog$267u6$1@dont-email.me> |
On 2026-05-12, none <none@none.rip> wrote: > On 12/05/2026 8:26 PM, Jim Jackson wrote: >> A friend of mine had a problem with >> external speakers/mic for his laptop - he >> does talks to groups. So he asked his new >> friend "copilot". Guess what - co-pilot >> suggested he needed a gizmo, helpfully >> saying it was available from Amazon. Off >> he goes and purchases this, and ... he's >> still having problems. Ah says his friend >> "copilot", "now you mention it what you need is >> actually this gizmo for, guess where, Amazon! >> And seemingly there are still problems, but >> he has it working-sort-of. >> >> So are big companies paying to get adverts >> in AIs? Or is it just regurgitating the stuff >> it's scraped from Amazon? >> >> And my friend has learnt nothing new from >> co-pilot. He has no real further understanding >> about the problem he had. Co-pilot had not >> educated him. But he does have some new buzz >> words that he picked up from the conversation. >> >> It could be, of course that he'd have got no >> further by entering into a conversation with >> humans on a bulletin board, or indeed here >> on usenet. I have no way of knowing. >> >> I reckon to use one of these tools well, you >> already need to be somewhat of an expert in >> the area of discussion - so you can spot the >> hallucinations and where it is off the mark. > > Of course. Free or paid tech out there - search, > ai, social media, app, whatever is not there > for you. It's infrastructure for extraction. If > it's dressed up as civic service changes nothing > about that. > > With ai we are relatively at the beginning. So > most are free, cool, entertaining. Just to > hook people, software and everything around. > The real fun will start later when everyone > will be there. > > Everything out there is designed to interface > with you in a way that maximizes their energy > takeout—money, time, attention, labor, data. I'm trying to remember.. doesn't ancient wisdom weigh in on how often a sucker is born? -- v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v | alt.troll.adam-h-kerman: proof that the | | internet sometimes gets something right | ^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Is this where we are going with AI? Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-05-12 18:26 +0000
Re: Is this where we are going with AI? none <none@none.rip> - 2026-05-12 20:49 +0200
Re: Is this where we are going with AI? oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> - 2026-05-13 00:07 +0000
Re: Is this where we are going with AI? none <none@none.rip> - 2026-05-13 02:28 +0200
Re: Is this where we are going with AI? oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> - 2026-05-13 02:58 +0000
Re: Is this where we are going with AI? ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2026-05-12 18:56 +0000
Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-05-12 19:19 +0000
Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2026-05-12 20:10 +0100
Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-05-12 19:17 +0000
Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2026-05-12 20:32 +0100
Re: Is this where we are going with AI? none <none@none.rip> - 2026-05-12 21:52 +0200
Re: Is this where we are going with AI? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-05-13 08:12 +1000
Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-05-13 09:48 +0000
Re: Is this where we are going with AI? oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> - 2026-05-13 12:18 +0000
Re: Is this where we are going with AI? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-05-14 08:52 +1000
Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Adrian Caspersz <email@here.invalid> - 2026-05-13 20:48 +0100
Re: Is this where we are going with AI? none <none@none.rip> - 2026-05-13 21:59 +0200
Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Oregonian Haruspex <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2026-05-13 21:46 +0000
Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-05-14 08:52 +0000
csiph-web