Re: Is this where we are going with AI?

From	oldernow <oldernow@dev.null>
Newsgroups	comp.misc
Subject	Re: Is this where we are going with AI?
Date	2026-05-13 02:58 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<slrn1107q6g.eaj.oldernow@oldernow.jethrick.com> (permalink)
References	<slrn1106s7d.2gf.jj@iridium.wf32df> <10tvsog$267u6$1@dont-email.me> <slrn1107g5k.b1e.oldernow@oldernow.jethrick.com> <10u0gjr$2bnt8$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 2026-05-13, none <none@none.rip> wrote:
> On 13/05/2026 2:07 AM, oldernow wrote:
>> 
>> I'm trying to remember.. doesn't ancient wisdom
>> weigh in on how often a sucker is born?
>
> Based on your age and shape, you did not
> post here over 12 hours, I thought you are
> dead. Maybe you are and you set up AI to
> continue your wording.

The thought of "oldernow" as a seeming
be-ing seems to persist, but surely
maintaining textural proof of its
seeming persistence would be the
domain of AU!

-- 
v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v
| alt.troll.adam-h-kerman: proof that the |
| internet sometimes gets something right |
^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^

Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Is this where we are going with AI? Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-05-12 18:26 +0000
  Re: Is this where we are going with AI? none <none@none.rip> - 2026-05-12 20:49 +0200
    Re: Is this where we are going with AI? oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> - 2026-05-13 00:07 +0000
      Re: Is this where we are going with AI? none <none@none.rip> - 2026-05-13 02:28 +0200
        Re: Is this where we are going with AI? oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> - 2026-05-13 02:58 +0000
  Re: Is this where we are going with AI? ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2026-05-12 18:56 +0000
    Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-05-12 19:19 +0000
  Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2026-05-12 20:10 +0100
    Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-05-12 19:17 +0000
      Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2026-05-12 20:32 +0100
  Re: Is this where we are going with AI? none <none@none.rip> - 2026-05-12 21:52 +0200
  Re: Is this where we are going with AI? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-05-13 08:12 +1000
    Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-05-13 09:48 +0000
      Re: Is this where we are going with AI? oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> - 2026-05-13 12:18 +0000
      Re: Is this where we are going with AI? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-05-14 08:52 +1000
  Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Adrian Caspersz <email@here.invalid> - 2026-05-13 20:48 +0100
    Re: Is this where we are going with AI? none <none@none.rip> - 2026-05-13 21:59 +0200
  Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Oregonian Haruspex <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2026-05-13 21:46 +0000
    Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-05-14 08:52 +0000

csiph-web