Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register

Groups > comp.misc > #28568

Re: Is this where we are going with AI?

Show all headers | View raw

Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> writes:

> On 2026-05-12, Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> wrote:
>> Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> writes:
>>
>>> A friend of mine had a problem with external speakers/mic for his laptop 
>>> - he does talks to groups. So he asked his new friend "copilot". Guess 
>>> what - co-pilot suggested he needed a gizmo, helpfully saying it was 
>>> available from Amazon. Off he goes and purchases this, and ... he's 
>>> still having problems. Ah says his friend "copilot", "now you mention it
>>> what you need is actually this gizmo for, guess where, Amazon!
>>> And seemingly there are still problems, but he has it working-sort-of.
>>>
>>> So are big companies paying to get adverts in AIs? Or is it just 
>>> regurgitating the stuff it's scraped from Amazon?
>>>
>>> And my friend has learnt nothing new from co-pilot. He has no real 
>>> further understanding about the problem he had. Co-pilot had not 
>>> educated him. But he does have some new buzz words that he picked up 
>>> from the conversation.
>>>
>>> It could be, of course that he'd have got no further by entering into a 
>>> conversation with humans on a bulletin board, or indeed here on usenet. 
>>> I have no way of knowing.
>>>
>>> I reckon to use one of these tools well, you already need to be somewhat 
>>> of an expert in the area of discussion - so you can spot the 
>>> hallucinations and where it is off the mark. 
>>
>> It sounds like a new version of an old problem. He should get a second
>> opinion. Maybe ask Claude. ;)
>
> Indeed. The future is AI speaketh unto AI!
>
> I just thought, why do the AI's not have female names?

Lumo is gender neutral apparently. (I asked Gemini).

Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Is this where we are going with AI? Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-05-12 18:26 +0000
  Re: Is this where we are going with AI? none <none@none.rip> - 2026-05-12 20:49 +0200
    Re: Is this where we are going with AI? oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> - 2026-05-13 00:07 +0000
      Re: Is this where we are going with AI? none <none@none.rip> - 2026-05-13 02:28 +0200
        Re: Is this where we are going with AI? oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> - 2026-05-13 02:58 +0000
  Re: Is this where we are going with AI? ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2026-05-12 18:56 +0000
    Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-05-12 19:19 +0000
  Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2026-05-12 20:10 +0100
    Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-05-12 19:17 +0000
      Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2026-05-12 20:32 +0100
  Re: Is this where we are going with AI? none <none@none.rip> - 2026-05-12 21:52 +0200
  Re: Is this where we are going with AI? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-05-13 08:12 +1000
    Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-05-13 09:48 +0000
      Re: Is this where we are going with AI? oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> - 2026-05-13 12:18 +0000
      Re: Is this where we are going with AI? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-05-14 08:52 +1000
  Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Adrian Caspersz <email@here.invalid> - 2026-05-13 20:48 +0100
    Re: Is this where we are going with AI? none <none@none.rip> - 2026-05-13 21:59 +0200
  Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Oregonian Haruspex <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2026-05-13 21:46 +0000
    Re: Is this where we are going with AI? Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-05-14 08:52 +0000

csiph-web