Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | "Kerr Mudd-John" <admin@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: computer history |
| Date | 2015-07-14 10:39 +0100 |
| Organization | dis |
| Message-ID | <op.x1rbskeamsr2db@dell3100.workgroup> (permalink) |
| References | <mo10fq$8o2$1@dont-email.me> <alpine.LNX.2.02.1507131628260.13783@darkstar.example.org> |
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 21:32:35 +0100, Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jul 2015, Bill Cunningham wrote: > >> I have read two different things concerning GUIs. The "Next Step" was >> the first GUI OS. Then I read it was something else that eludes me right >> now. Anyone know for sure? >> >> Thanks 2 those interested. >> > What's the question? > > In the Unix world, the OS continued as always, but at some point (and I > don't know the year), X came along to ride on top of it. That continues > today with Linux. > > Are you asking when a GUI of some sort first arrived, or when an > operating system arrived that had the GUI integrated into it? There is a > difference. > > WIndows in the early days was a failure, but it had the Windows riding > onto of the traditional MS-DOS. Then later, Windows integrated > differently, so the OS ran Windows from startup. > > Others have pointed out early "GUIs", so if it's the former, Next > couldn't be it. If it's the latter, I thought Next was a GUI riding on > top of an existing OS. He's a troll. But hey it is quiet in here. Taxi, Gem were early micro computer GUIs but then you get to argue they were interfaces not the OS. -- Bah, and indeed, Humbug
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
computer history "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-07-13 14:38 -0400
Re: computer history Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-07-13 18:52 +0000
Re: computer history Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-07-13 20:56 +0000
Re: computer history Andy Burns <usenet.feb2014@adslpipe.co.uk> - 2015-07-13 19:54 +0100
Re: computer history Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-07-13 16:32 -0400
Re: computer history "Kerr Mudd-John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2015-07-14 10:39 +0100
Re: computer history Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2015-07-14 18:16 -0300
Re: computer history Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-07-15 08:06 +0000
Re: computer history Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2015-07-15 11:34 +0200
Re: computer history Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-07-15 10:29 +0000
Re: computer history Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-07-15 10:52 -0400
Re: computer history Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-07-15 14:54 +0000
Re: computer history Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2015-07-15 12:53 +0200
Re: computer history "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-07-16 16:52 -0400
Re: computer history Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-07-16 22:50 +0100
Re: computer history "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-07-17 12:42 -0400
Re: computer history Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-07-17 13:58 -0400
Re: computer history Nyssa <Nyssa@flawlesslogic.com> - 2015-07-17 14:17 -0400
Re: computer history Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-07-17 15:43 -0400
Re: computer history Nyssa <Nyssa@flawlesslogic.com> - 2015-07-18 11:05 -0400
Re: computer history mm0fmf <none@mailinator.com> - 2015-07-20 20:17 +0100
Re: computer history Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-18 09:46 -0400
Re: computer history Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-07-18 14:48 +0100
Re: computer history scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2015-07-17 18:30 +0000
Re: computer history Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-07-17 15:49 -0400
Re: computer history Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-07-22 15:09 +0000
Re: computer history True Satan <true_satan@fastmail.co.uk> - 2015-07-17 22:24 +0000
Re: computer history Johnny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2015-07-18 00:45 +0000
Re: computer history Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-07-17 23:59 -0400
Re: computer history Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-07-18 09:46 +0000
Re: computer history Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-07-18 09:42 +0000
Re: computer history "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-07-20 13:48 -0400
Re: computer history mm0fmf <none@mailinator.com> - 2015-07-20 20:43 +0100
Re: computer history RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2015-07-21 10:31 +0300
Re: computer history "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-07-25 13:47 -0400
Re: computer history Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-07-25 22:04 +0100
Re: computer history Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-07-22 15:08 +0000
Re: computer history Johnny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2015-07-22 18:43 +0000
Re: computer history Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2015-07-18 02:25 +0200
Re: computer history Johnny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2015-07-18 01:01 +0000
Re: computer history Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2015-07-18 10:43 +0200
Re: computer history Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-07-16 22:00 +0000
Re: computer history "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-07-17 12:44 -0400
Re: computer history Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-07-17 17:58 +0000
Re: computer history "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-07-14 12:36 -0400
csiph-web