Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | mm0fmf <none@mailinator.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: computer history |
| References | (7 earlier) <mobb7g$th2$1@dont-email.me> <alpine.LNX.2.02.1507171356310.22821@darkstar.example.org> <mobgtk$it3$1@dont-email.me> <alpine.LNX.2.02.1507171538320.23089@darkstar.example.org> <modq0m$afo$1@dont-email.me> |
| Message-ID | <EPbrx.862$e41.673@fx26.am4> (permalink) |
| Organization | virginmedia.com |
| Date | 2015-07-20 20:17 +0100 |
On 18/07/2015 16:05, Nyssa wrote: > and I > would think that serious business users would have gone > the CP/M route instead since there were more business > oriented software packages available for that platform > such as Visicalc You do know that Visicalc originally was written for the Apple II not CP/M? People used to buy Apples just for Visicalc. Some people didn't realise the Apple was a home/personal computer, they thought they were Visicalc engines. I can remember loading Apple Invaders onto an Apple used in an customer's accounts dept. I'll never forget what one of the employees said, "Hey look! You can play space invaders on Visicalc." As for Z80 cards... the reason to have a Z80 running CP/M in an Apple was to be able to run Microsoft MASM M80. That was "the" Z80/8080 assembler of choice back in the day. The cool feature the version sold for the Z80 card was that it supported 6502 development as well. The Microsoft linker L80 has some serious short comings but with PSA's PLINK-80 package you had a supercharged Z80/6502 development system that even including the outrageous costs of an Apple II plus disks in the UK still worked out cheaper than buying a crufty S-100 CP/M system. Of course you could always play some games on the Apple when you got bored programming. Some of us where there and used these systems and tools to earn a living.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
computer history "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-07-13 14:38 -0400
Re: computer history Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-07-13 18:52 +0000
Re: computer history Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-07-13 20:56 +0000
Re: computer history Andy Burns <usenet.feb2014@adslpipe.co.uk> - 2015-07-13 19:54 +0100
Re: computer history Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-07-13 16:32 -0400
Re: computer history "Kerr Mudd-John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2015-07-14 10:39 +0100
Re: computer history Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2015-07-14 18:16 -0300
Re: computer history Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-07-15 08:06 +0000
Re: computer history Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2015-07-15 11:34 +0200
Re: computer history Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-07-15 10:29 +0000
Re: computer history Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-07-15 10:52 -0400
Re: computer history Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-07-15 14:54 +0000
Re: computer history Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2015-07-15 12:53 +0200
Re: computer history "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-07-16 16:52 -0400
Re: computer history Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-07-16 22:50 +0100
Re: computer history "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-07-17 12:42 -0400
Re: computer history Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-07-17 13:58 -0400
Re: computer history Nyssa <Nyssa@flawlesslogic.com> - 2015-07-17 14:17 -0400
Re: computer history Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-07-17 15:43 -0400
Re: computer history Nyssa <Nyssa@flawlesslogic.com> - 2015-07-18 11:05 -0400
Re: computer history mm0fmf <none@mailinator.com> - 2015-07-20 20:17 +0100
Re: computer history Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-18 09:46 -0400
Re: computer history Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-07-18 14:48 +0100
Re: computer history scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2015-07-17 18:30 +0000
Re: computer history Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-07-17 15:49 -0400
Re: computer history Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-07-22 15:09 +0000
Re: computer history True Satan <true_satan@fastmail.co.uk> - 2015-07-17 22:24 +0000
Re: computer history Johnny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2015-07-18 00:45 +0000
Re: computer history Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-07-17 23:59 -0400
Re: computer history Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-07-18 09:46 +0000
Re: computer history Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-07-18 09:42 +0000
Re: computer history "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-07-20 13:48 -0400
Re: computer history mm0fmf <none@mailinator.com> - 2015-07-20 20:43 +0100
Re: computer history RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2015-07-21 10:31 +0300
Re: computer history "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-07-25 13:47 -0400
Re: computer history Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-07-25 22:04 +0100
Re: computer history Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-07-22 15:08 +0000
Re: computer history Johnny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2015-07-22 18:43 +0000
Re: computer history Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2015-07-18 02:25 +0200
Re: computer history Johnny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2015-07-18 01:01 +0000
Re: computer history Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2015-07-18 10:43 +0200
Re: computer history Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-07-16 22:00 +0000
Re: computer history "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-07-17 12:44 -0400
Re: computer history Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-07-17 17:58 +0000
Re: computer history "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-07-14 12:36 -0400
csiph-web