Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #65334

Re: __init__ is the initialiser

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <nicholas.cole@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python.': 0.02; 'python,': 0.02; 'output': 0.05; 'lines,': 0.07; 'needed,': 0.07; 'none,': 0.07; 'feature.': 0.09; 'lookup': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'python': 0.11; 'language,': 0.12; "wouldn't": 0.14; 'posted': 0.15; 'dict': 0.16; 'did,': 0.16; 'does,': 0.16; 'exists,': 0.16; 'reasonably': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'said.': 0.16; 'scrub': 0.16; 'types,': 0.16; 'exception': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'bit': 0.19; 'file,': 0.19; 'possible,': 0.19; 'feb': 0.22; 'memory': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'instance,': 0.24; 'mon,': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'sort': 0.25; "i've": 0.25; 'possibly': 0.26; 'references': 0.26; 'right.': 0.26; 'required.': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'along': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; '"do': 0.31; 'concern': 0.31; 'everywhere': 0.31; 'object.': 0.31; 'os,': 0.31; 'time;': 0.31; 'probably': 0.32; '(including': 0.33; 'skip:d 20': 0.34; 'subject:the': 0.34; "can't": 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'keyword': 0.36; 'marks': 0.36; "i'll": 0.36; 'possible': 0.36; 'turn': 0.37; 'files': 0.38; 'rather': 0.38; 'itself': 0.39; 'use.': 0.39; 'sure': 0.39; 'either': 0.39; 'how': 0.40; 'remove': 0.60; 'above,': 0.60; "you're": 0.61; 'times': 0.62; 'kind': 0.63; 'soon': 0.63; 'more': 0.64; 'talking': 0.65; 'to:addr:gmail.com': 0.65; 'close': 0.67; 'smith': 0.68; 'special': 0.74; 'truth': 0.81; 'dict.': 0.84; 'domain,': 0.84; "it'd": 0.84; 'that)': 0.84
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=16jxnOtezkKlGfj/qQwO76PtiPtY+zmqtFPAvoVTZ0M=; b=WAcGs4DI+uC6+j4ABQeQtWySg6cv4QfrDT8VlspyLLrU7ww/3s2qvl7aCLutuLQ3z/ mVcZunrfU4YDTdWsz9HtDXkfV74q5oYZbl25pjkucw+Sk9zvl+jeDSQR5rqWFaPbEMXL NCHeSL11VAMj2mc5UoEvM6hJTWjk5e8U4xdMU0oD7EmB7rv1yJW4FhYhSN84D3WNhHSN rHA9Seusbeon0mn84K9j1AE+YVxuAuCBbYtP56CKpgCpihIT8VhYBHgfJlCcBPPh5gyz GWQwGQkvsLOzq6kClpEf/DvXRDDzB0KYxZ5ZtzZAK4LeDGVlMCcKxwJe47+2CiSsg5W8 lbpw==
MIME-Version 1.0
X-Received by 10.15.44.202 with SMTP id z50mr3052649eev.81.1391435404565; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 05:50:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To <CAPTjJmo6qpfP74YF+2xKV1y-qUNt6rG+8kHkoYJZXbb3HED5pg@mail.gmail.com>
References <lcgtpf$tui$1@ger.gmane.org> <lcgut2$b8r$1@ger.gmane.org> <858utviwgs.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <lchce7$44q$1@ger.gmane.org> <52EC3C40.7080402@stoneleaf.us> <mailman.6251.1391224639.18130.python-list@python.org> <52ec84bc$0$29972$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <roy-5740C1.00250401022014@news.panix.com> <bl81skFh14iU1@mid.individual.net> <mailman.6313.1391383680.18130.python-list@python.org> <roy-C454F0.18405902022014@news.panix.com> <CAPTjJmo6qpfP74YF+2xKV1y-qUNt6rG+8kHkoYJZXbb3HED5pg@mail.gmail.com>
Date Mon, 3 Feb 2014 13:50:04 +0000
Subject Re: __init__ is the initialiser
From Nicholas Cole <nicholas.cole@gmail.com>
To Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc "python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.6339.1391435410.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 35
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1391435410 news.xs4all.nl 2842 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:38591
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:65334

Show key headers only | View raw


On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> wrote:
>> I'm reasonably sure you posted this as humor, but there is some truth in
>> what you said.  In the crypto/security domain, you often want to keep a
>> key or cleartext around only for the time it's needed, and scrub the
>> memory it was occupying as soon as it is no longer in use.
>>
>> I don't know how you would do that in Python.
>
> I did, but you're right.
>
> It's fundamentally not possible in pure Python, because there's no way
> to flag a block of memory as "do not page this to disk". For what
> you're talking about to be at all possible, you would need support
> from the language, from the OS, and possibly from the CPU as well. I'm
> sure this sort of thing exists, but if it does, it'll probably be
> something that Python itself wouldn't concern itself with - you'd get
> it via openssl or something.
>
> There have been occasional times I've wanted an "explicit destruction"
> feature. Rather than the facetious exception I listed above, it'd be
> better to have all those references (including the original one in a,
> since there's nothing special about that) turn into some kind of "null
> state" - either None, or a special object that marks itself as a
> destructed/destroyed (terminology debates aside) object. With custom
> types, I can mark them off with a special flag, and check that all the
> time; but I can't, for instance, have a dict that maps some lookup
> keyword to its output file, and then destroy output files to remove
> all their references from everywhere in the dict. (I have had
> something along these lines, a bit more complicated than this, but not
> in Python.)

Can't you get close to that using weakrefs?  I'll admit that care is required.

N.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: __init__ is the initialiser Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-01-31 22:16 -0500
  Re: __init__ is the initialiser Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-02-01 05:23 +0000
    Re: __init__ is the initialiser Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-01 00:25 -0500
      Re: __init__ is the initialiser Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-02-03 12:15 +1300
        Re: __init__ is the initialiser Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 10:27 +1100
          Re: __init__ is the initialiser Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-02 18:40 -0500
            Re: __init__ is the initialiser Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 11:07 +1100
            Re: __init__ is the initialiser Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2014-02-02 17:24 -0800
            Re: __init__ is the initialiser Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 12:37 +1100
            Re: __init__ is the initialiser Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2014-02-02 17:54 -0800
            Re: __init__ is the initialiser Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2014-02-03 08:44 -0500
            Re: __init__ is the initialiser Nicholas Cole <nicholas.cole@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 13:50 +0000
            Re: __init__ is the initialiser Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 10:44 -0700
            Re: __init__ is the initialiser Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-04 04:57 +1100
            Re: __init__ is the initialiser Nicholas Cole <nicholas.cole@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 19:57 +0000
            Re: __init__ is the initialiser Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2014-02-03 19:38 -0500
        Re: __init__ is the initialiser Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-02-02 19:35 -0500
          Re: __init__ is the initialiser Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-02 19:45 -0500
            Re: __init__ is the initialiser Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-02-02 22:14 -0500
            Re: __init__ is the initialiser Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2014-02-02 21:15 -0600
            Re: __init__ is the initialiser Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-02-03 00:06 -0500
              Re: __init__ is the initialiser Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-03 00:12 -0500
                Re: __init__ is the initialiser Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 16:49 +1100
                Re: __init__ is the initialiser Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-02-02 21:34 -0800
    Re: __init__ is the initialiser Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-01-31 21:31 -0800

csiph-web