Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > comp.lang.misc > #11671

Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM)

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.misc, sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, sci.math
Subject Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM)
Date 2025-12-14 10:25 -0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <meutjk5dbdkumltftc863acnqfhredn18u@4ax.com> (permalink)
References (7 earlier) <mpvbpeF4vjhU2@mid.individual.net> <10hfpbu$15ikv$1@gwaiyur.mb-net.net> <ta6njkpnj7qeb1mrn35jpd9luqpi0ps693@4ax.com> <dtknjk1njc8ftah0b2atiuudil5f17dvog@4ax.com> <10hmdsq$12gki$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, 14 Dec 2025 14:27:17 +0100, "Paul.B.Andersen"
<relativity@paulba.no> wrote:

>Den 12.12.2025 09:49, skrev The Starmaker:
>> On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 20:45:30 -0800, The Starmaker
>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Here is the REAL Einstein  patent on Google Patent Website. (that
>>> doesn't contain the fruad)
>>>
>>> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf
>
>Well done to dig up the real patent application of December 19. 1926.
>
>So it's settled now, it is a refrigerator.
>
>> 
>> Furthermore, if you search The Real Einstein patent on Goggle patents,
>> you won't find the word "refrigerator".
>> 
>> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf
>
>The very first statement in the application:
>  "Our invention relates to the art of refrigeration and particularly
>   to an apparatus and method for producing refrigeration .."
>
>Didn't you understand that "an apparatus for producing refrigeration"
>is a refrigerator?
>
>The new invention was an absorption refrigerator with no moving parts.
>
>At that time all refrigerators were based on the refrigerant ammonia
>which is a very toxic gas which is not nice to have in your kitchen.
>
>> 
>> Albert Einstein's patent is simply a Refrideration cooling system
>> process to keep it from having a China Syndrome...
>> 
>> (The China syndrome is when a nuclear power plant's radioactive core's
>> cooling system fails.)
>> 
>> Here is what a Reactor looks like today:
>> 
>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1148280696122699778/photo/1
>> 
>> and here is a cut-out out of both:
>> 
>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1148279328121090048/photo/1
>> 
>> But, this is Albert Einstein's patent on a  "fast breeding reactor"!
>> 
>> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf
>> 
>> Anyone today who still thinks the patent is for cooling food has
>> tested Positive for Stupid.
>
>:-D
>
>Einstein and Szilard's patent was bought by the Swedish company Electrolux.
>
>In 1953 (when I was a kid) my parents bought
>an Electrolux absorption refrigerator.
>
>Fortunately, we were so Stupid that we didn't realise that we had
>a fast breading reactor in the kitchen.


I understand English is your second language.

Under Einstein's name you can clearly see the Heading of the word in
Capitol letters    REFRIDERATION       (meaning all caps)


refrigeration

refrigeration, the process of removing heat from an enclosed space or
from a substance for the purpose of lowering the temperature.

https://www.google.com/search?q=define+refrigeration


 REFRIDERATION is a process, it is not a machine.

It is a process.

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/refrigeration


You probably need an understanding also of what the word "process"
means...

define process

a series of actions or steps taken in order to achieve a particular
end.

perform a series of mechanical or chemical operations on (something)
in order to change or preserve it.

a series of actions that produce something or that lead to a
particular result



Now, if you take 
 REFRIDERATION
and add a process

Albert Einstein's patent is simply a Refrideration cooling system
process to keep it from having a China Syndrome...
 
 The China syndrome is when a nuclear power plant's radioactive core's
 cooling system fails.



Albert Einstein is all 'about' Atomic Bombs.

That's all he thinks of..

building an atomic bomb.

It is Albert Einstein's 'responsibility' that an atomic bomb gets
built properly. 

It's his baby.

His life goal was to build an atomic bomb.

It's all he talked about.

"...I showed (39 years ago already) that according to the special
theory of relativity, there exists an equivalence between the mass and
energy of a system, that is, that the two are only different
manifestations of the same thing. Also I noted that the energies
released by radioactive decay are great enough to be emitted in a
nuclear reaction when there is an imbalance of mass...." -Albert
Einstein


Atomic Bomb School.

As everyone knows by now...
if you went to a class
given by Albert Einstein..

you became a student
in Albert Einstein's

How To Build an Atomic Bomb.


Most of yous already know
the names of the students
who attended
Albert Einstein's

Atomic Bomb School.

Should I list them all?
Or one by one??

From 1905
Albert Einstein
drew a straight line
to 1939.

To build an atomic bomb.

First he had to assemble a team.

He did that in the 1920's
by teaching his students
How to build an atomic bomb.


Enrico Fermi when he was 21 years old:

Enrico Fermi was intensively involved with Einstein's theory of
relativity and traced the hidden power of atomic nuclei.
In 1923, he wrote that it would probably not be possible to release
this energy in the near future, "because
the first effect would be an explosion so terrible that it would tear
the physicist who tried it to pieces".


His first was a paper on electrodynamics of a rigid, charged body. The
second and third papers focused on his first love, relativity theory;
the third
presented an important theorem about how the theory works within very
small distances and proposed a system of coordinates to make the
analysis of
these small distances easier to compute. The fourth was a highly
successful
effort to reconcile the different ways that the electromagnetic mass
of a rigid
spherical charged body—that is, the mass measured by application of
force in
an electromagnetic field—is measured in classical electrodynamic
theory and
in relativity.

A fifth paper, apparently commissioned for a German publication while
he was still at Pisa but published after graduation, was an
appreciation of
relativity. This essay was one of the very few published by an Italian
physicist to evince any enthusiasm for Einstein and his outlandish
theories of
space, time, and gravity. Fermi’s main purpose was,
characteristically, to call
attention not to the puzzling philosophical and metaphysical
consequences of
the theory but rather to one of the theory’s most compelling physical
predictions:


If we could liberate the energy contained in one gram of matter we
would get more energy
than exerted by a thousand horses working continuously over three
years. (Comments
seem superfluous!) It will be said, with good reason, that in the near
future at least that it
does not appear possible to find a way to liberate this awesome amount
of energy. This is
indeed as one can only hope; an explosion of such an awesome amount of
energy would
blow to pieces the physicist who had the misfortune of finding a way
to produce it.


He may not have been the first person to notice this consequence of
Einstein’s work, but he was certainly one of the very few at the time
who
emphasized its importance. In light of what life had in store for him,
his
words are particularly prophetic. Years later, as he witnessed the
first test of


in Einstein's own words:


An Elementary Derivation of the Equivalence of Mass and Energy

THE FOLLOWING DERIVATION of the law of equivalence, which has not been
published before, has two advantages. Although it makes use of the
principle of special relativity, it does not presume the formal
machinery of the theory but uses only three previously known laws:
(1) The law of the conservation of momentum.
(2) The expression for the pressure of radiation; that is, the
momentum
of a complex of radiation moving in a fixed direction.
(3) The well known expression for the aberration of light (influence
of
the motion of the earth on the apparent location of the fixed
stars-Bradley).
We now consider the following system. Let the body B rest

freely in space with respect to the system Ko. Two complexes of
radiation S, S'each of energy E/2 move in the positive and negative xo
direction respectively and are eventually absorbed by B. With this
absorption
the energy of B increases by E. The body B stays at rest with respect
to
Ko by reasons of symmetry.
an atomic bomb and considered his role in making that test possible,
he
certainly thought back to these words, written when he was just
twenty-one
years old.

Albert Einstein in 1905 who first 'hinted' of "a very interesting
conclusion"
https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/vol2-trans/186

(Now, "a very interesting conclusion" is also known as ...the aha!
moment.)


"Perhaps it will prove possible to test this theory using bodies whose
energy content is variable to a high degree (e.g., salts of radium).
-- Albert Einstein (1905)

https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/vol2-trans/188

"... it will prove possible to test this theory"


"That weapon has a direct link to Einstein's three-page paper. In a
nuclear fission reaction, an atomic nucleus splits, resulting in a
reduced overall mass of matter, which is emitted in the form of
released energy."

that no one in the United States 'picked up' on Albert Einstein's "a
very interesting conclusion" except from some guiena named Enrico
Fermi.


"because the first effect would be an explosion so terrible that it
would tear the physicist who tried it to pieces". --Enrico Fermi 1923


Now, do yous actually believe this is a BLOUSE that Albert Einstein
file
a patent for in 1936????


https://patents.google.com/patent/USD101756?oq=USD101756-0




Of course not. Albert Einstein was tooo busy building his atomic
bombs.

He had to come up with a way to protect others from being exposed to
URANIUM RADIATION.

So he simply designed a Radiation Vest Jacket:

It's not a blouse, it's a radiation vest!


http://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pages/US5274851-2.png

https://patents.google.com/patent/US5274851A/en?oq=US5274851+

https://patents.google.com/patent/US8067759?oq=radiation+vest

https://www.theyeshivaworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/20160923_EOS_0467.jpg



don't forget, he spoke german..that means the word "blouse" might have
a
different meaning..
meaning not having to do with 'women'.



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to comp.lang.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-04 07:50 +0100
  Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-04 09:57 +0100
    Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-06 17:02 +0100
      Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-06 18:02 +0100
        Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-07 12:59 +0100
      Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-07 10:31 +0100
        Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-07 13:00 +0100
    Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-07 10:22 +0100
      Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-07 10:39 +0100
      Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-07 10:46 +0100
        Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-08 08:10 +0100
          Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-08 08:44 +0100
          Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-08 08:49 +0100
      Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-07 11:42 +0100
        Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-12-07 16:26 +0200
          Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-08 04:25 +0100
            Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-08 08:51 +0100
            Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-12-08 13:58 +0200
            Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-09 09:15 +0100
          Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-20 04:48 +0000
            Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> - 2025-12-21 00:07 +0000
              Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2025-12-21 10:37 +0000
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-21 22:20 +0000
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-12-22 00:56 +0200
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-22 13:24 +0100
              Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-21 22:23 +0000
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> - 2025-12-22 17:55 +0000
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-22 21:20 +0000
        Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-08 08:21 +0100
          Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-08 09:06 +0100
            Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-09 09:19 +0100
            Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-09 11:43 -0800
              Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-10 08:19 +0100
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-10 09:56 +0100
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-10 10:01 -0800
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-11 09:02 +0100
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-11 08:48 -0800
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-12 01:58 +0100
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-11 20:45 -0800
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-11 23:07 -0800
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-12 00:49 -0800
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-14 14:27 +0100
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 10:25 -0800
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-14 21:22 +0100
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 12:52 -0800
                I have a great idea The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 13:11 -0800
                Einstein refrigerator (was: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-15 03:00 +0100
                Re: Einstein refrigerator (was: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 19:46 -0800
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 10:27 -0800
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 10:58 -0800
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-15 07:50 +0100
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-15 14:05 +0100
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-16 08:44 +0100
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-16 22:58 +0100
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-17 08:50 +0100
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-17 14:24 +0100
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-18 22:13 -0800
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-19 12:02 -0800
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-17 18:24 +0100
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-18 06:49 +0000
  Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-06 05:30 +0100

csiph-web