Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > comp.lang.misc > #11665

Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM)

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.misc, sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM)
Date 2025-12-11 08:48 -0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <nksljk5108lr7auglj60uqda5bbbmlef5n@4ax.com> (permalink)
References (7 earlier) <10h60um$1o41r$2@dont-email.me> <q1ugjkpb1np6a4tu4aau6p8fa56c2de6s0@4ax.com> <mpskr8FllfcU1@mid.individual.net> <0qcjjkl56cgau74e7m4soi9hk9s5e9ces7@4ax.com> <mpvbpeF4vjhU2@mid.individual.net>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 09:02:56 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
wrote:

>Am Mittwoch000010, 10.12.2025 um 19:01 schrieb The Starmaker:
>> On Wed, 10 Dec 2025 08:19:04 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Am Dienstag000009, 09.12.2025 um 20:43 schrieb The Starmaker:
>>>> On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 09:06:46 +0100, Janis Papanagnou
>>>> <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2025-12-08 08:21, Thomas Heger wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> An invention needs to be new. Otherwise it is not an invention.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not only new, but also not being something considered trivial or
>>>>> otherwise not "worthy" of being a patent.
>>>>>
>>>>>> At least this is the main principle upon which patents are granted in
>>>>>> Germany.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the German patent history we can observe that even marvellous
>>>>> inventions have not been granted a patent because the officials
>>>>> could neither understand nor see the actual or potential future
>>>>> relevance and usefulness.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Albert Einstein worked at a patent office and even decided WHO gets
>>>> the patent. Albert Einstein was bribred to give the patent to the guy
>>>> who bribed him.
>>>>
>>>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/WhZcPHah3Dc/m/QaT6MFBIAAAJ
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Did you see the boat they gave him for it?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Albert Einstein told his friends to create FAKE patents!
>>>> (at least they got a patent on something)
>>>>
>>>> https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2014/05/16/szilards-chain-reaction/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Only an Einstein can think of fake patents.
>>>> (he approves it himself)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Einstein and Szillard patented a device, which is commonly called
>>> 'Einstein's fridge'.
>>>
>>> But that device has only one known use as part of a fast breeding reactor.
>>>
>>> And a group of students who wanted to replicate the device found out,
>>> that it didn't cool.
>>>
>>> So, a plausible guess would be:
>>>
>>> the 'fridge' was actually meant to become a part of a fast breeding
>>> reactor, but named 'fridge' to hide this fact.
>>>
>>>
>>> But that would lead to a very unpleasant conclusion:
>>>
>>> to patent a part of a fast breeding reactor would require the existence
>>> of a fast breeding reactor in the first place.
>>>
>>> And that would require the need of Plutonium, because that's the stuff
>>> which thoese reactors 'breed'.
>>>
>>> And as Plutonium is among the most toxic substances on the planet, it
>>> requires good reason to want Plutonium.
>>>
>>> That could actually be the existence of atomic bombs already in the late
>>> 1920th/early 1930th in Germany. And that would suggest, that all stories
>>> related to the creation of the bomb were fake, too.
>>>
>>> That would mean, that the so called 'Manhattan project' didn't invent
>>> the bomb, but had other objectives (like e.g. placing a 'secrecy gag'
>>> upon theoretical physics).
>>>
>>> Also chilling would be, that in such a scenario the Germans were in
>>> possesion of atomic bombs already in the late 1920th.
>>>
>>> TH
>>>
>> 
>> I lost count how many times I posted here...
>> 
>> that which you call "a fast breeding reactor"
>> 
>> is what you see in the diagram here..
>> 
>> https://www.google.com/search?q=fast+breeding+reactor.&oq=fast+breeding+reactor
>> 
>
>
>This is a good paper about the subject:
>
>https://fissilematerials.org/library/rr08.pdf
>
>Quote:
>
>"
>Fast Breeder Reactor Programs: History and Status
>Overview: The Rise and Fall of Plutonium Breeder Reactors
>Frank von Hippel
>1
>The possibility of a plutonium?fueled nuclear reactor that could produce 
>more fuel than it consumed (a “breeder reactor”) was first raised during 
>World War II in the United States by scientists in the atomic bomb program."
>
>But this was seemingly a lie, because if the first fast breeding 
>reactors were invented and built in Los Alamos in WWII, then why and how 
>could Einstein invent and patent a part of that reactor already in 1930 
>in Berlin?
>
>...
>
>
>TH


Albert Einstein and his gang of friends were busy building an atomic
bomb before the Manhattan Project...

here is FERMI, Enrico patent in 1935
https://onlineonly.christies.com/s/fine-printed-books-manuscripts-including-americana/patent-method-producing-nuclear-reactions-139/270604?ldp_breadcrumb=back&sc_lang=zh


Some recent work by E.Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been com-

municated to me in manuscript, leads me to expect that the element
uran-

ium may be turned into a new and important source of energy in the im-

mediate future.

b) to speed up the experimental work,which is at present being car-

ried on within the limits of the budgets of University laboratories

https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first


The "University laboratories" is in fact the Manhattan Project.


They got the money, right?

They finish the experiment...

they dropped the bomb.


https://content.time.com/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg






-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to comp.lang.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-04 07:50 +0100
  Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-04 09:57 +0100
    Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-06 17:02 +0100
      Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-06 18:02 +0100
        Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-07 12:59 +0100
      Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-07 10:31 +0100
        Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-07 13:00 +0100
    Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-07 10:22 +0100
      Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-07 10:39 +0100
      Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-07 10:46 +0100
        Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-08 08:10 +0100
          Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-08 08:44 +0100
          Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-08 08:49 +0100
      Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-07 11:42 +0100
        Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-12-07 16:26 +0200
          Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-08 04:25 +0100
            Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-08 08:51 +0100
            Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-12-08 13:58 +0200
            Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-09 09:15 +0100
          Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-20 04:48 +0000
            Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> - 2025-12-21 00:07 +0000
              Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2025-12-21 10:37 +0000
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-21 22:20 +0000
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-12-22 00:56 +0200
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-22 13:24 +0100
              Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-21 22:23 +0000
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> - 2025-12-22 17:55 +0000
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-22 21:20 +0000
        Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-08 08:21 +0100
          Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-08 09:06 +0100
            Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-09 09:19 +0100
            Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-09 11:43 -0800
              Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-10 08:19 +0100
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-10 09:56 +0100
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-10 10:01 -0800
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-11 09:02 +0100
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-11 08:48 -0800
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-12 01:58 +0100
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-11 20:45 -0800
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-11 23:07 -0800
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-12 00:49 -0800
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-14 14:27 +0100
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 10:25 -0800
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-14 21:22 +0100
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 12:52 -0800
                I have a great idea The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 13:11 -0800
                Einstein refrigerator (was: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-15 03:00 +0100
                Re: Einstein refrigerator (was: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 19:46 -0800
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 10:27 -0800
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 10:58 -0800
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-15 07:50 +0100
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-15 14:05 +0100
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-16 08:44 +0100
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-16 22:58 +0100
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-17 08:50 +0100
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-17 14:24 +0100
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-18 22:13 -0800
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-19 12:02 -0800
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-17 18:24 +0100
                Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-18 06:49 +0000
  Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-06 05:30 +0100

csiph-web