Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #10919
| From | Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Design Question |
| Date | 2011-12-20 15:25 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <t662f7hn4preu62m62361nc27jkdolm7n7@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <Xns9FBFC38D782BCjpnasty@94.75.214.39> <m64ve7tl89bnlti6oflqf4cipjmrur8k4o@4ax.com> <9703975.362.1324395730498.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@preg20> <tfp1f7pfjkbrgj3crgddg4lpl8l3a4qafh@4ax.com> <28248718.48.1324421706183.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbnd7> |
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:55:06 -0800 (PST), soulspirit@gmail.com wrote:
>On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 8:51:00 PM UTC+1, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>[...]
>> >> There are a number of acceptable answers. If you are just
>> >> learning OOP, using it could be a good exercise in using a simple
>> >> example so you can be sure you understand. This does not mean that it
>> >> is, in general, a good approach for your problem.
>> >
>> >And yet it is.
>>
>> Nope. It is a tool. There are areas where it is good, and
>> others where it is not.
>
>I agree!
>I think I would never follow OOP paradigms to program my 10yrs old washing machine's firmware.
>But just try to add a little more complexity to the ploblem et voila', OOP comes to.
Well, no. Not necessarily.
>Reading at your posts Gene, I'm increasingly convinced you'd do better in a computer history
museum... even more when you try to defend your anachronistic
convincements.
It is sad that anything different from what we have now is often
considered anachronistic.
I like wheels. Wheels are far older than any of the ideas I have
defended. Do you like wheels?
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Design Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2011-12-19 00:13 +0000
Re: Design Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-18 19:24 -0500
Re: Design Question ilAn <idonot@wantspam.net> - 2011-12-20 16:47 +0200
Re: Design Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-20 10:39 -0500
Re: Design Question markspace <-@.> - 2011-12-18 19:23 -0800
Re: Design Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2011-12-19 13:26 +0000
Re: Design Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2011-12-19 13:28 +0000
Re: Design Question Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-12-19 07:16 -0400
Re: Design Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2011-12-19 13:49 +0000
Re: Design Question Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-12-19 22:22 +0000
Re: Design Question Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-12-19 20:13 -0400
Re: Design Question Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-20 07:37 -0800
Re: Design Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-20 10:42 -0500
Re: Design Question Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-12-20 17:46 -0400
Re: Design Question Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-12-20 20:40 +0000
Re: Design Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2011-12-19 13:34 +0000
Re: Design Question Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-19 06:25 -0800
Re: Design Question Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-19 11:38 -0800
Re: Design Question Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-20 07:42 -0800
Re: Design Question Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-20 11:51 -0800
Re: Design Question soulspirit@gmail.com - 2011-12-20 14:55 -0800
Re: Design Question Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-20 15:25 -0800
Re: Design Question soulspirit@gmail.com - 2011-12-21 01:11 -0800
Re: Design Question Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-21 11:08 -0800
Re: Design Question soulspirit@gmail.com - 2011-12-21 15:27 -0800
Re: Design Question Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-21 18:06 -0800
csiph-web