Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #10916
| From | soulspirit@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Design Question |
| Date | 2011-12-20 14:55 -0800 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <28248718.48.1324421706183.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbnd7> (permalink) |
| References | <Xns9FBFC38D782BCjpnasty@94.75.214.39> <m64ve7tl89bnlti6oflqf4cipjmrur8k4o@4ax.com> <9703975.362.1324395730498.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@preg20> <tfp1f7pfjkbrgj3crgddg4lpl8l3a4qafh@4ax.com> |
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 8:51:00 PM UTC+1, Gene Wirchenko wrote: [...] > >> There are a number of acceptable answers. If you are just > >> learning OOP, using it could be a good exercise in using a simple > >> example so you can be sure you understand. This does not mean that it > >> is, in general, a good approach for your problem. > > > >And yet it is. > > Nope. It is a tool. There are areas where it is good, and > others where it is not. I agree! I think I would never follow OOP paradigms to program my 10yrs old washing machine's firmware. But just try to add a little more complexity to the ploblem et voila', OOP comes to. Reading at your posts Gene, I'm increasingly convinced you'd do better in a computer history museum... even more when you try to defend your anachronistic convincements. -- SoulSpirit
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Design Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2011-12-19 00:13 +0000
Re: Design Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-18 19:24 -0500
Re: Design Question ilAn <idonot@wantspam.net> - 2011-12-20 16:47 +0200
Re: Design Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-20 10:39 -0500
Re: Design Question markspace <-@.> - 2011-12-18 19:23 -0800
Re: Design Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2011-12-19 13:26 +0000
Re: Design Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2011-12-19 13:28 +0000
Re: Design Question Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-12-19 07:16 -0400
Re: Design Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2011-12-19 13:49 +0000
Re: Design Question Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-12-19 22:22 +0000
Re: Design Question Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-12-19 20:13 -0400
Re: Design Question Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-20 07:37 -0800
Re: Design Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-20 10:42 -0500
Re: Design Question Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-12-20 17:46 -0400
Re: Design Question Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-12-20 20:40 +0000
Re: Design Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2011-12-19 13:34 +0000
Re: Design Question Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-19 06:25 -0800
Re: Design Question Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-19 11:38 -0800
Re: Design Question Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-20 07:42 -0800
Re: Design Question Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-20 11:51 -0800
Re: Design Question soulspirit@gmail.com - 2011-12-20 14:55 -0800
Re: Design Question Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-20 15:25 -0800
Re: Design Question soulspirit@gmail.com - 2011-12-21 01:11 -0800
Re: Design Question Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-21 11:08 -0800
Re: Design Question soulspirit@gmail.com - 2011-12-21 15:27 -0800
Re: Design Question Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-21 18:06 -0800
csiph-web