Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #10933

Re: Design Question

From Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Design Question
Date 2011-12-21 11:08 -0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <afb4f7hiqfq4nq8jsblsf5c2g2v1nf1qde@4ax.com> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <9703975.362.1324395730498.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@preg20> <tfp1f7pfjkbrgj3crgddg4lpl8l3a4qafh@4ax.com> <28248718.48.1324421706183.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbnd7> <t662f7hn4preu62m62361nc27jkdolm7n7@4ax.com> <26896587.194.1324458671926.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbbfq24>

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:11:11 -0800 (PST), soulspirit@gmail.com wrote:

>On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 12:25:38 AM UTC+1, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>[...]
>>      I like wheels.  Wheels are far older than any of the ideas I have
>> defended.  Do you like wheels?
>
>I do, because there aren't good alternatives to them, nor interesting and affordable evolutions of the concept.

     The wheel has evolved considerably.

>My boss says he can't understand many of the architectural problems we deal with
 nowadays; he says everything was simpler, clearer, bug free and more
linear with COBOL. Should I evaluate COBOL for my next WEB-based
project?

     I do not believe him.  Do you?

     If you have something workable now, why change?  This is much the
same as why should a working system written in COBOL be rewritten in
language-flavour-of-the-short-time-period.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko
     

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Design Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2011-12-19 00:13 +0000
  Re: Design Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-18 19:24 -0500
    Re: Design Question ilAn <idonot@wantspam.net> - 2011-12-20 16:47 +0200
      Re: Design Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-20 10:39 -0500
  Re: Design Question markspace <-@.> - 2011-12-18 19:23 -0800
    Re: Design Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2011-12-19 13:26 +0000
    Re: Design Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2011-12-19 13:28 +0000
  Re: Design Question Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-12-19 07:16 -0400
    Re: Design Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2011-12-19 13:49 +0000
      Re: Design Question Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-12-19 22:22 +0000
        Re: Design Question Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-12-19 20:13 -0400
          Re: Design Question Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-20 07:37 -0800
            Re: Design Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-20 10:42 -0500
              Re: Design Question Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-12-20 17:46 -0400
        Re: Design Question Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-12-20 20:40 +0000
  Re: Design Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2011-12-19 13:34 +0000
  Re: Design Question Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-19 06:25 -0800
  Re: Design Question Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-19 11:38 -0800
    Re: Design Question Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-20 07:42 -0800
      Re: Design Question Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-20 11:51 -0800
        Re: Design Question soulspirit@gmail.com - 2011-12-20 14:55 -0800
          Re: Design Question Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-20 15:25 -0800
            Re: Design Question soulspirit@gmail.com - 2011-12-21 01:11 -0800
              Re: Design Question Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-21 11:08 -0800
                Re: Design Question soulspirit@gmail.com - 2011-12-21 15:27 -0800
                Re: Design Question Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-21 18:06 -0800

csiph-web