Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #10939
| From | soulspirit@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Design Question |
| Date | 2011-12-21 15:27 -0800 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <28361679.375.1324510022059.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqgn9> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <tfp1f7pfjkbrgj3crgddg4lpl8l3a4qafh@4ax.com> <28248718.48.1324421706183.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbnd7> <t662f7hn4preu62m62361nc27jkdolm7n7@4ax.com> <26896587.194.1324458671926.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbbfq24> <afb4f7hiqfq4nq8jsblsf5c2g2v1nf1qde@4ax.com> |
On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 8:08:07 PM UTC+1, Gene Wirchenko wrote: > On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:11:11 -0800 (PST), souls...@gmail.com wrote: > > >On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 12:25:38 AM UTC+1, Gene Wirchenko wrote: [...] > > Should I evaluate COBOL for my next WEB-based project? > > I do not believe him. Do you? > > If you have something workable now, why change? This is much the > same as why should a working system written in COBOL be rewritten in > language-flavour-of-the-short-time-period. Because things evolve. How would you add web services capabilities to a COBOL program? How would you publish an AS/400 application to the internet? Sometimes reworking something from scratch costs less than evolving an obsolete system. But we were talking about new projects, you diverted from the subject. > > Should I evaluate COBOL for my next WEB-based project? I miss your answer here. -- SoulSpirit
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Design Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2011-12-19 00:13 +0000
Re: Design Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-18 19:24 -0500
Re: Design Question ilAn <idonot@wantspam.net> - 2011-12-20 16:47 +0200
Re: Design Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-20 10:39 -0500
Re: Design Question markspace <-@.> - 2011-12-18 19:23 -0800
Re: Design Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2011-12-19 13:26 +0000
Re: Design Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2011-12-19 13:28 +0000
Re: Design Question Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-12-19 07:16 -0400
Re: Design Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2011-12-19 13:49 +0000
Re: Design Question Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-12-19 22:22 +0000
Re: Design Question Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-12-19 20:13 -0400
Re: Design Question Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-20 07:37 -0800
Re: Design Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-20 10:42 -0500
Re: Design Question Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-12-20 17:46 -0400
Re: Design Question Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-12-20 20:40 +0000
Re: Design Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2011-12-19 13:34 +0000
Re: Design Question Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-19 06:25 -0800
Re: Design Question Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-19 11:38 -0800
Re: Design Question Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-20 07:42 -0800
Re: Design Question Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-20 11:51 -0800
Re: Design Question soulspirit@gmail.com - 2011-12-20 14:55 -0800
Re: Design Question Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-20 15:25 -0800
Re: Design Question soulspirit@gmail.com - 2011-12-21 01:11 -0800
Re: Design Question Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-21 11:08 -0800
Re: Design Question soulspirit@gmail.com - 2011-12-21 15:27 -0800
Re: Design Question Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-21 18:06 -0800
csiph-web