Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #21060
| From | Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? |
| Date | 2013-01-06 19:44 +0000 |
| Organization | UK Free Software Network |
| Message-ID | <kcck67$6f4$1@localhost.localdomain> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <-8CdnaTS2P6a5HTNnZ2dnUVZ8vOdnZ2d@bt.com> <8f48da51-0eac-42cf-ab1e-f44b3cefac01@googlegroups.com> <d87371ee-a671-407e-96cf-f506e53fcb89@googlegroups.com> <kOWdnXkvJPMn4nTNnZ2dnUVZ8judnZ2d@bt.com> <50e99d08$0$284$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
On Sun, 06 Jan 2013 10:49:26 -0500, Arne Vajhøj wrote: > I have seen so many new Java programmers learning BlueJ and then not > being able to do anything, because they did not understand classpath, > what is Java vs what is IDE etc.. > I'd probably go further and start students with a decent text editor and command line calls for javac/java on the grounds that right from the start they'll have a better understanding of the Java compilation and runtime environment. Once they're starting to write class hierarchies its time to introduce packages, ant and jar. Why now? Because I found the later introduction of these items to be confusing, requiring, as they did, a certain amount of unlearning, particularly in connection with jar files, manifests and classpaths. I don't think students need to see an IDE until they start to find out about refactoring. Again, I'd leave this as late ads possible for two reasons: (1) IDEs generally have complex GUIs which can be quite intimidating to a newbie, (2) they kick entirely too much stuff that a programmer needs to know under the carpet: the build process, jarfile creation, package management, version control - all things that I think are best dealt with explicitly rather than being left to the IDE's magic smoke and mirrors. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org |
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-01-06 13:09 +0000
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? "Aryeh M. Friedman" <Aryeh.Friedman@gmail.com> - 2013-01-06 05:19 -0800
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? "Aryeh M. Friedman" <Aryeh.Friedman@gmail.com> - 2013-01-06 05:28 -0800
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-01-06 13:36 +0000
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-01-06 13:44 +0000
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-06 10:49 -0500
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-06 11:45 -0500
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-01-06 19:44 +0000
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-06 16:09 -0500
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-01-06 21:46 +0000
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-01-06 14:02 +0000
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-01-06 14:12 +0000
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-06 10:42 -0500
csiph-web