Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #21021
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-06 05:19 -0800 |
| References | <public-20130106091348@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <-8CdnaTS2P6a5HTNnZ2dnUVZ8vOdnZ2d@bt.com> |
| Message-ID | <8f48da51-0eac-42cf-ab1e-f44b3cefac01@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? |
| From | "Aryeh M. Friedman" <Aryeh.Friedman@gmail.com> |
On Sunday, January 6, 2013 8:09:45 AM UTC-5, Chris Uppal wrote: > Stefan Ram wrote: > > > > > There is no �public� in front of �class� in Oracles Tutorial! > > > > > > What should I teach in my classes? > > > > I don't have a strong opinion on how the class should be declared, but I do > > think -- and very strongly -- that the Java entry-point convention is a massive > > kludge, It makes sense for historical reasons (it was designed to model the Unix/C convention [likely a hold over before the JVM itself was created]). > > > FWIW: the examples in the JLS3 all use an default access class to house the > > (specified to be required) public static void main(String args...) or public > > static void main(String[] args) entry-point. The spec does not appear to care > > what access the class itself has (and there's no obvious reason -- technical or > > semantic -- why it should). Does "private" work ? If so then using that would > > be defensible. And no *SANE* person would use the JLS to teach the language from! That being said private is allowed for inner classes but no where else I think
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-01-06 13:09 +0000
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? "Aryeh M. Friedman" <Aryeh.Friedman@gmail.com> - 2013-01-06 05:19 -0800
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? "Aryeh M. Friedman" <Aryeh.Friedman@gmail.com> - 2013-01-06 05:28 -0800
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-01-06 13:36 +0000
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-01-06 13:44 +0000
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-06 10:49 -0500
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-06 11:45 -0500
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-01-06 19:44 +0000
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-06 16:09 -0500
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-01-06 21:46 +0000
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-01-06 14:02 +0000
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-01-06 14:12 +0000
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-06 10:42 -0500
csiph-web