Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #16472

Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML??

Path	csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	kensi <kensi_kensington@zoonoses.de>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML??
Date	Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:51:54 -0400
Organization	SICN
Lines	34
Message-ID	<jv1fsq$3sj$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<5012E6BE.55400.calajapr@time.synchro.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host	Is4yh4S33AXJ9SVZ2K4F2g.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Complaints-To	abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent	NewsTap/3.5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
X-Notice	Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:16472

Show key headers only | View raw

On 27/07/2012 3:42 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
[snip]

Why are half the people in this group suddenly switching to this 
news.tds.net NNTP provider?

I ask because that NNTP provider is b0rken:

1. Every post has the same NNTP-Posting-Host header, even from people I
    know are not sockpuppets of one another, e.g. you, Robert Klemmke,
    David Lamb, and Jim Janney all have recent posts with
    NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.21.70.65.

2. Posts through that server have the References: header stripped. As
    a result, every time any of you posts through that server it breaks
    a piece off the thread you're replying to, causing clutter and making
    discussions more difficult to follow.

3. It seems to fuck up character encodings, most noticeably when Vajhøj
    posts or is replied to via TDS as he has a non-ASCII character in his
    name.

Please switch back to your original providers, or if you can't for some 
reason, such as because they closed, please find something better than 
TDS to replace them with. AIOE works well enough for me and does not 
break References: when I reply or screw up encoding the ø character. It 
does not require signup. Eternal-September is something I often see 
recommended, does require signup, but is free. Either of those is 
probably better than (and maybe even cheaper than) this TDS, from all 
indications.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks

Thread

Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-nwi-this> - 2012-07-27 19:42 +0000
  Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Patricia Shanahan" <patricia.shanahan@1:261/38.remove-nwi-this> - 2012-07-27 19:42 +0000
    Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "jebblue" <jebblue@1:261/38.remove-z1h-this> - 2012-07-28 18:36 +0000
    Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-qhs-this> - 2012-08-08 19:04 +0000
  Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Gene Wirchenko" <gene.wirchenko@1:261/38.remove-nwi-this> - 2012-07-27 19:42 +0000
  Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? kensi <kensi_kensington@zoonoses.de> - 2012-07-28 15:51 -0400
    Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2012-07-28 22:03 +0200
      Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-07-28 13:12 -0700
        Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2012-07-28 22:16 -0400
          Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-07-29 10:55 +0200
            Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-07-29 11:14 +0200
              Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-07-29 15:28 -0700
    Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-07-28 19:29 -0400
    Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2012-07-28 18:20 -0600

csiph-web