Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #16470

Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML??

From "jebblue" <jebblue@1:261/38.remove-z1h-this>
Subject Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML??
Message-ID <50142C2C.55441.calajapr@time.synchro.net> (permalink)
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
References <5012E6BF.55408.calajapr@time.synchro.net>
Date 2012-07-28 18:36 +0000
Organization tds.net

Show all headers | View raw


  To: Patricia Shanahan
From: jebblue <n@n.nnn>

On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 18:41:01 +0000, Patricia Shanahan wrote:

> To: Arne Vajhr#j
> From: Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org>
>
> On 7/26/2012 11:47 AM, Arne Vajhoj wrote: ...
>> Someone believing in most of them is a different story. I am skeptical
>> about calling such a person for a Java developer. Even though the code
>> is following JLS and compiles with javac, then there is almost no
>> overlap with the Java world. It is not the Java way. And if the
>> person tried to write such code at work, then the person would be
>> kicked out quickly in many places. It is not what companies expect
>> when they hire a Java developer.
> ...
>
> I think of programming languages as tools, not philosophies. Java happens to
be
> a favorite tool, one that fits my brain the way my favorite wood carving
chisel
> fits my hand. On the other hand, I no more subscribe to "the Java way" than
to
> a "the half inch chisel way".
>
> When I'm starting a new program, in a situation in which I'm free to use any
> standards I like, I follow the commonest conventions for the program's
> language. If I'm modifying or adding to an existing project, or working in an
> organization that has other conventions, I follow the local conventions.
>
> Patricia
>
> --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
>  * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
> --- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
> Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

I agree with Patricia, eloquently articulated.

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
 * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
--- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-nwi-this> - 2012-07-27 19:42 +0000
  Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Patricia Shanahan" <patricia.shanahan@1:261/38.remove-nwi-this> - 2012-07-27 19:42 +0000
    Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "jebblue" <jebblue@1:261/38.remove-z1h-this> - 2012-07-28 18:36 +0000
    Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-qhs-this> - 2012-08-08 19:04 +0000
  Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Gene Wirchenko" <gene.wirchenko@1:261/38.remove-nwi-this> - 2012-07-27 19:42 +0000
  Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? kensi <kensi_kensington@zoonoses.de> - 2012-07-28 15:51 -0400
    Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2012-07-28 22:03 +0200
      Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-07-28 13:12 -0700
        Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2012-07-28 22:16 -0400
          Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-07-29 10:55 +0200
            Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-07-29 11:14 +0200
              Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-07-29 15:28 -0700
    Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-07-28 19:29 -0400
    Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2012-07-28 18:20 -0600

csiph-web