Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #16470
| From | "jebblue" <jebblue@1:261/38.remove-z1h-this> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? |
| Message-ID | <50142C2C.55441.calajapr@time.synchro.net> (permalink) |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| References | <5012E6BF.55408.calajapr@time.synchro.net> |
| Date | 2012-07-28 18:36 +0000 |
| Organization | tds.net |
To: Patricia Shanahan From: jebblue <n@n.nnn> On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 18:41:01 +0000, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > To: Arne Vajhr#j > From: Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> > > On 7/26/2012 11:47 AM, Arne Vajhoj wrote: ... >> Someone believing in most of them is a different story. I am skeptical >> about calling such a person for a Java developer. Even though the code >> is following JLS and compiles with javac, then there is almost no >> overlap with the Java world. It is not the Java way. And if the >> person tried to write such code at work, then the person would be >> kicked out quickly in many places. It is not what companies expect >> when they hire a Java developer. > ... > > I think of programming languages as tools, not philosophies. Java happens to be > a favorite tool, one that fits my brain the way my favorite wood carving chisel > fits my hand. On the other hand, I no more subscribe to "the Java way" than to > a "the half inch chisel way". > > When I'm starting a new program, in a situation in which I'm free to use any > standards I like, I follow the commonest conventions for the program's > language. If I'm modifying or adding to an existing project, or working in an > organization that has other conventions, I follow the local conventions. > > Patricia > > --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1 > * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38) > --- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98 > Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24 I agree with Patricia, eloquently articulated. --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1 * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38) --- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98 Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-nwi-this> - 2012-07-27 19:42 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Patricia Shanahan" <patricia.shanahan@1:261/38.remove-nwi-this> - 2012-07-27 19:42 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "jebblue" <jebblue@1:261/38.remove-z1h-this> - 2012-07-28 18:36 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-qhs-this> - 2012-08-08 19:04 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Gene Wirchenko" <gene.wirchenko@1:261/38.remove-nwi-this> - 2012-07-27 19:42 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? kensi <kensi_kensington@zoonoses.de> - 2012-07-28 15:51 -0400
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2012-07-28 22:03 +0200
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-07-28 13:12 -0700
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2012-07-28 22:16 -0400
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-07-29 10:55 +0200
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-07-29 11:14 +0200
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-07-29 15:28 -0700
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-07-28 19:29 -0400
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2012-07-28 18:20 -0600
csiph-web