Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #17403
| From | "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-qhs-this> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? |
| Message-ID | <5022AB82.56354.calajapr@time.synchro.net> (permalink) |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| References | <5012E6BF.55408.calajapr@time.synchro.net> |
| Date | 2012-08-08 19:04 +0000 |
| Organization | tds.net |
To: Patricia Shanahan From: "Arne Vajhoj" <arne.vajhoj@1:261/38.remove-p82-this> To: Patricia Shanahan From: Arne Vajhoj <arne@vajhoej.dk> On 7/27/2012 12:05 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > On 7/26/2012 11:47 AM, Arne Vajhoj wrote: > ... >> Someone believing in most of them is a different story. I am skeptical >> about calling such a person for a Java developer. Even though the code >> is following JLS and compiles with javac, then there is almost no >> overlap with the Java world. It is not the Java way. And if the >> person tried to write such code at work, then the person would be >> kicked out quickly in many places. It is not what companies expect >> when they hire a Java developer. > ... > > I think of programming languages as tools, not philosophies. Java > happens to be a favorite tool, one that fits my brain the way my > favorite wood carving chisel fits my hand. On the other hand, I no more > subscribe to "the Java way" than to a "the half inch chisel way". > > When I'm starting a new program, in a situation in which I'm free to use > any standards I like, I follow the commonest conventions for the > program's language. If I'm modifying or adding to an existing project, > or working in an organization that has other conventions, I follow the > local conventions. So in reality you are subscribing to the Java way. Arne -+- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1 + Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38) -+- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98 Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24 --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1 * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38) --- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98 Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-nwi-this> - 2012-07-27 19:42 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Patricia Shanahan" <patricia.shanahan@1:261/38.remove-nwi-this> - 2012-07-27 19:42 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "jebblue" <jebblue@1:261/38.remove-z1h-this> - 2012-07-28 18:36 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-qhs-this> - 2012-08-08 19:04 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Gene Wirchenko" <gene.wirchenko@1:261/38.remove-nwi-this> - 2012-07-27 19:42 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? kensi <kensi_kensington@zoonoses.de> - 2012-07-28 15:51 -0400
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2012-07-28 22:03 +0200
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-07-28 13:12 -0700
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2012-07-28 22:16 -0400
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-07-29 10:55 +0200
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-07-29 11:14 +0200
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-07-29 15:28 -0700
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-07-28 19:29 -0400
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2012-07-28 18:20 -0600
csiph-web