Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #16472
| From | kensi <kensi_kensington@zoonoses.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? |
| Date | 2012-07-28 15:51 -0400 |
| Organization | SICN |
| Message-ID | <jv1fsq$3sj$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <5012E6BE.55400.calajapr@time.synchro.net> |
On 27/07/2012 3:42 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
[snip]
Why are half the people in this group suddenly switching to this
news.tds.net NNTP provider?
I ask because that NNTP provider is b0rken:
1. Every post has the same NNTP-Posting-Host header, even from people I
know are not sockpuppets of one another, e.g. you, Robert Klemmke,
David Lamb, and Jim Janney all have recent posts with
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.21.70.65.
2. Posts through that server have the References: header stripped. As
a result, every time any of you posts through that server it breaks
a piece off the thread you're replying to, causing clutter and making
discussions more difficult to follow.
3. It seems to fuck up character encodings, most noticeably when Vajhøj
posts or is replied to via TDS as he has a non-ASCII character in his
name.
Please switch back to your original providers, or if you can't for some
reason, such as because they closed, please find something better than
TDS to replace them with. AIOE works well enough for me and does not
break References: when I reply or screw up encoding the ø character. It
does not require signup. Eternal-September is something I often see
recommended, does require signup, but is free. Either of those is
probably better than (and maybe even cheaper than) this TDS, from all
indications.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-nwi-this> - 2012-07-27 19:42 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Patricia Shanahan" <patricia.shanahan@1:261/38.remove-nwi-this> - 2012-07-27 19:42 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "jebblue" <jebblue@1:261/38.remove-z1h-this> - 2012-07-28 18:36 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-qhs-this> - 2012-08-08 19:04 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Gene Wirchenko" <gene.wirchenko@1:261/38.remove-nwi-this> - 2012-07-27 19:42 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? kensi <kensi_kensington@zoonoses.de> - 2012-07-28 15:51 -0400
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2012-07-28 22:03 +0200
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-07-28 13:12 -0700
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2012-07-28 22:16 -0400
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-07-29 10:55 +0200
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-07-29 11:14 +0200
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-07-29 15:28 -0700
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-07-28 19:29 -0400
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2012-07-28 18:20 -0600
csiph-web