Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #11373

Re: Blocks for scope control

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Blocks for scope control
Date	Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:59:19 +0100
Lines	32
Message-ID	<9ni06jF9acU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<dBCQq.122$d%2.16@newsfe07.iad> <block-20120115171817@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <9ngdd9Fv6mU1@mid.individual.net> <temporary-names-20120115175901@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	individual.net xToIQORLMq8XXUr7x+SYTAmUFYdsvIxU+Z0qFlp9K9Rs2w7Lo=
Cancel-Lock	sha1:QuIPTLyyBXcTfAYt0Wc2qMOqDC8=
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
In-Reply-To	<temporary-names-20120115175901@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:11373

Show key headers only | View raw

On 15.01.2012 17:59, Stefan Ram wrote:
> Robert Klemme<shortcutter@googlemail.com>  writes:
>>> { final Button button = new Button(); frame.add( button ); }
>> Why do you think it makes sense to replace this
>> frame.add( new Button() );
>> with the block above?
>
>    This code (comments removed by me):
>
> for (ThumbnailAction thumbAction : chunks) {
>      JButton thumbButton = new JButton(thumbAction);
>      buttonBar.add(thumbButton, buttonBar.getComponentCount() - 1);
> }
>
>    can be found in the renowned Java Tutorial at
>
> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/uiswing/components/icon.html
>
>    . So such temporary names for one-time use are not
>    against common teachings.

OK, but here there are more arguments to add() and the line is longer. 
That makes more sense than the original example to me.

Cheers

	robert


-- 
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/

Thread

Blocks for scope control Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-01-15 11:50 -0400
  Re: Blocks for scope control Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-15 17:10 +0100
  Re: Blocks for scope control Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-15 17:32 +0100
    Re: Blocks for scope control Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-01-15 11:21 -0800
    Re: Blocks for scope control Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-16 07:59 +0100
  Re: Blocks for scope control markspace <-@.> - 2012-01-15 09:57 -0800
    Re: Blocks for scope control Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-01-15 11:28 -0800
  Re: Blocks for scope control Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-01-15 11:00 -0800
    Re: Blocks for scope control Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-01-15 17:49 -0400
      Re: Blocks for scope control Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-01-15 15:45 -0800
        Re: Blocks for scope control Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-01-19 21:54 -0400
          Re: Blocks for scope control Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-20 08:41 +0100
            Re: Blocks for scope control Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-01-20 15:24 -0800
            Re: Blocks for scope control Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-01-20 19:30 -0400
              Re: Blocks for scope control Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-01-20 15:54 -0800
      Re: Blocks for scope control Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-16 07:55 +0100
        Re: Blocks for scope control Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-01-19 21:16 -0400
          Re: Blocks for scope control Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-21 13:25 +0100
            Re: Blocks for scope control Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-01-21 10:41 -0400
              Re: Blocks for scope control Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-22 13:03 +0100
  Re: Blocks for scope control Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-01-16 06:09 -0800
    Re: Blocks for scope control Henk van Voorthuijsen <voorth@xs4all.nl> - 2012-01-16 07:03 -0800
  Re: Blocks for scope control Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-01-17 18:43 -0500
  Re: Blocks for scope control Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-01-20 11:05 -0800
  Re: Blocks for scope control Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-01-20 12:11 -0800
  Re: Blocks for scope control Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-06 21:24 -0500

csiph-web