Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: Blocks for scope control
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:59:19 +0100
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <9ni06jF9acU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <dBCQq.122$d%2.16@newsfe07.iad> <block-20120115171817@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <9ngdd9Fv6mU1@mid.individual.net> <temporary-names-20120115175901@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net xToIQORLMq8XXUr7x+SYTAmUFYdsvIxU+Z0qFlp9K9Rs2w7Lo=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:QuIPTLyyBXcTfAYt0Wc2qMOqDC8=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
In-Reply-To: <temporary-names-20120115175901@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:11373

On 15.01.2012 17:59, Stefan Ram wrote:
> Robert Klemme<shortcutter@googlemail.com>  writes:
>>> { final Button button = new Button(); frame.add( button ); }
>> Why do you think it makes sense to replace this
>> frame.add( new Button() );
>> with the block above?
>
>    This code (comments removed by me):
>
> for (ThumbnailAction thumbAction : chunks) {
>      JButton thumbButton = new JButton(thumbAction);
>      buttonBar.add(thumbButton, buttonBar.getComponentCount() - 1);
> }
>
>    can be found in the renowned Java Tutorial at
>
> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/uiswing/components/icon.html
>
>    . So such temporary names for one-time use are not
>    against common teachings.

OK, but here there are more arguments to add() and the line is longer. 
That makes more sense than the original example to me.

Cheers

	robert


-- 
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/