Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #11353
| From | markspace <-@.> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Blocks for scope control |
| Date | 2012-01-15 09:57 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <jev431$v4i$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <dBCQq.122$d%2.16@newsfe07.iad> |
On 1/15/2012 7:50 AM, Arved Sandstrom wrote:
> I almost never see anyone else using these things this way.
IMO, I dislike spurious and overused indentation in code, so that's
likely why I shy away from "extra" use of braces.
for( ...some code )
{
do some init
{
do a little work
{
declare a temporary variable
}
{
declare another temporary variable
}
{
declare yet another temporary variable
}
{
declare still yet another temporary variable
{
declare a temporary variable inside
an anonymous block
}
}
}
}
vs. just one level of indentation, I believe I'd greatly prefer the
latter, especially in the long run. And the above is with 3-4 spaces
for indenting, imagine what it would look like with 8.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Blocks for scope control Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-01-15 11:50 -0400
Re: Blocks for scope control Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-15 17:10 +0100
Re: Blocks for scope control Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-15 17:32 +0100
Re: Blocks for scope control Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-01-15 11:21 -0800
Re: Blocks for scope control Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-16 07:59 +0100
Re: Blocks for scope control markspace <-@.> - 2012-01-15 09:57 -0800
Re: Blocks for scope control Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-01-15 11:28 -0800
Re: Blocks for scope control Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-01-15 11:00 -0800
Re: Blocks for scope control Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-01-15 17:49 -0400
Re: Blocks for scope control Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-01-15 15:45 -0800
Re: Blocks for scope control Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-01-19 21:54 -0400
Re: Blocks for scope control Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-20 08:41 +0100
Re: Blocks for scope control Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-01-20 15:24 -0800
Re: Blocks for scope control Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-01-20 19:30 -0400
Re: Blocks for scope control Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-01-20 15:54 -0800
Re: Blocks for scope control Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-16 07:55 +0100
Re: Blocks for scope control Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-01-19 21:16 -0400
Re: Blocks for scope control Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-21 13:25 +0100
Re: Blocks for scope control Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-01-21 10:41 -0400
Re: Blocks for scope control Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-22 13:03 +0100
Re: Blocks for scope control Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-01-16 06:09 -0800
Re: Blocks for scope control Henk van Voorthuijsen <voorth@xs4all.nl> - 2012-01-16 07:03 -0800
Re: Blocks for scope control Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-01-17 18:43 -0500
Re: Blocks for scope control Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-01-20 11:05 -0800
Re: Blocks for scope control Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-01-20 12:11 -0800
Re: Blocks for scope control Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-06 21:24 -0500
csiph-web