Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #14025
| From | Peter Cheung <cmk128@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: JOutlookBar |
| Date | 2012-04-29 07:37 -0700 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <18532876.11.1335710273525.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbpw7> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <ZRZmr.174818$s82.123807@newsfe10.iad> <jnies5$t93$1@news.albasani.net> <4525969.3.1335683635411.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcgx8> <32890598.730.1335684673600.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbw7> <jnivoa$r7m$1@news.albasani.net> |
Lew於 2012年4月29日星期日UTC+8下午4時56分50秒寫道: > Peter Cheung wrote: > > why people in the forum look like angering something on me? > > There are several reasons, and it's a fair question. > > In the first place, I doubt that anyone is actually angry with you. There is a > difference between harshness and anger, although few people pay attention to > the difference. You have triggered some harsh reactions, but people really are > trying to impart information to help you. The thing you do right is to engage > with the conversation, to keep responding to people and trying to understand. > As long as you do that no one should actually be angry with you. I cannot really identify harshness/anger from english text, english is not my first language. > > What people have been telling you is important information. There are high > standards to professional programming, and they are rigorous. Early on you > showed some resistance to the information people gave you. This is especially > important in the area of ethics, which you violated. Besides that, you did not > respond to the comments regarding engineering flaws in your code. Your > responses to other comments, namely the lack of Javadocs and a build script, > were dismissive and constituted little more than, "I'm not doing that." We > know you're not doing that, we pointed out that you're not doing that. More > importantly we pointed out that you should be doing that, advice that you > ignore at your own cost. There is only one developer to develop peter-swing, yes, its me. The primary goal for peter-swing is to make a new theme for my other project http://code.google.com/p/peter-bochs/ . If it is working, i don't want to spend time on writing comment, i would like to spend time on peter-bochs rather. I really don't need a build script, because eclipse can build. Eclipse can build a executable jar, it is enough for me. I don't know how hurt is my sentence "I'm not doing that", but in chinese, that sentence is not a offensive sentence. But the words "Wow, shame on you, Peter", it is very offensive in my point of view. > > Basically you have not shown interest in the wisdom and expertise that the > several very smart and knowledgeable people like Patricia Shanahan, Daniel > Pitts, markspace and Arne Vajhøj, to name a few, have shared. You don't give > reasons or logic for your decisions. You seem unaware and uninterested in > respect for copyrights. Instead of taking coding advice, you say, "Let me > finish my project," indicating that you are going to follow bad code with even > more bad code. I create components and theme for people use, that is the only wisdom i have in peter-swing project. If you think peter-swing project is bad enough, just leave it. I really didn't steal somebody code, The class metalbump in my project, actually I don't use it. I have removed it. > > So people aren't so much angry with you as contemptuous of your behavior. Not > of you, necessarily - I cannot imagine Ms. Dr. Shanahan showing less than > exquisite courtesy and respect to any human being, for example - but certainly > of actions that will harm your ability to put together good software. > > It's not good to be emotional or defensive about one's work in this business. > The results have to work, and work in accordance with expectations. That is > what it is beyond all wishing or superstition or resistance to brutally honest > advice. Take the advice - respect for your behavior is far less important than > success in software development. Following the advice of those wiser in this > arena will lead to both. > > -- > Lew > Honi soit qui mal y pense. > http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Friz.jpg
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
JOutlookBar Peter Cheung <cmk128@gmail.com> - 2012-04-26 15:29 -0700
Re: JOutlookBar Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-04-26 16:19 -0700
Re: JOutlookBar Peter Cheung <cmk128@gmail.com> - 2012-04-26 20:17 -0700
Re: JOutlookBar Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-04-27 10:11 -0700
Re: JOutlookBar markspace <-@.> - 2012-04-27 12:33 -0700
Re: JOutlookBar Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-04-27 13:51 -0700
Re: JOutlookBar Peter Cheung <cmk128@gmail.com> - 2012-04-28 03:10 -0700
Re: JOutlookBar Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-04-28 18:03 -0400
Re: JOutlookBar Peter Cheung <cmk128@gmail.com> - 2012-04-28 03:06 -0700
Re: JOutlookBar Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-04-28 15:06 -0700
Re: JOutlookBar Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-04-28 21:08 -0700
Re: JOutlookBar Peter Cheung <cmk128@gmail.com> - 2012-04-29 00:13 -0700
Re: JOutlookBar Peter Cheung <cmk128@gmail.com> - 2012-04-29 00:31 -0700
Re: JOutlookBar Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-04-29 01:56 -0700
Re: JOutlookBar Peter Cheung <cmk128@gmail.com> - 2012-04-29 07:37 -0700
Re: JOutlookBar Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-04-29 07:51 -0700
Re: JOutlookBar Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-04-29 12:01 -0700
Re: JOutlookBar Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-05-05 19:53 -0400
csiph-web