Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #23732
| From | "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: THANK YOU |
| Date | 2013-06-17 20:12 -0400 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <kpo8eh$fku$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <f1ab28e4-1d57-4456-b9fe-c5158bc1f7ce@c3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <51b9a2b9$0$6364$e4fe514c@dreader35.news.xs4all.nl> <6a139868-d903-41ff-adb7-fb41709a920e@googlegroups.com> <A-WdnY6oe-D9nifMnZ2dnUVZ_gCdnZ2d@supernews.com> <d032ab02-aaec-4581-9d1b-6521ed14c092@b4g2000yql.googlegroups.com> |
"Hugh Aguilar" <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:d032ab02-aaec-4581-9d1b-6521ed14c092@b4g2000yql.googlegroups.com... > > But innovation has two aspects: the concept, and the > > implementation. The closer together you can bring these > > two, the better. Being able to actually see your new idea > > working as soon as possible enhances your creativity. Forth > > is unparalleled for making this possible, both for > > individual innovators and creative teams. > > I'm not aware of anybody on comp.lang.forth having ever done > anything innovative. Uh, are you fishing for a complement ... again? Do you have a damaged ego or what? > Give an example. Is your use of "anybody" inclusive or exclusive of yourself? If exclusive, you'd be the only person here, according to you, who could qualify as doing something innovative. You've excluded everyone else. So, do you mean something like your novice package is innovative? Yeah, at this point, after much promotion by you and no mention of it by anyone else, it seems you're the only one who is going to provide that as an example of something innovative on comp.lang.forth... Sorry, that probably hurts. If inclusive, we must exclude your novice package too, but I'd be surprised if you were unaware of your own innovation... Rod Pemberton
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: THANK YOU rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-06-06 16:46 -0400
Re: THANK YOU "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-06-06 23:28 -0400
Re: THANK YOU rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-06-07 18:07 -0400
Re: THANK YOU Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-06-07 03:27 -0700
Re: THANK YOU anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-06-07 11:44 +0000
Re: THANK YOU Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-06-07 14:16 -0700
Re: THANK YOU rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-06-07 18:11 -0400
Re: THANK YOU visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-06-08 21:37 -0700
Re: THANK YOU rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-06-09 14:42 -0400
Re: THANK YOU Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-06-11 00:51 -0700
Re: THANK YOU rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 20:57 -0400
Re: THANK YOU Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2013-06-11 18:12 -0700
Re: THANK YOU rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 23:27 -0400
Re: THANK YOU Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2013-06-17 00:04 -0700
Re: THANK YOU Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-06-12 00:22 -0700
Re: THANK YOU Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-06-09 03:59 -0700
Re: THANK YOU Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2013-06-08 19:02 -0700
Re: THANK YOU rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-06-09 14:45 -0400
Re: THANK YOU "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-06-10 16:54 -0400
Re: THANK YOU "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-06-10 11:33 -1000
Re: THANK YOU "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-06-11 19:50 -0400
Re: THANK YOU Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-06-12 00:58 -0700
Re: THANK YOU Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-06-12 01:08 -0700
Re: THANK YOU Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-06-12 01:16 -0700
Re: THANK YOU "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-06-17 20:27 -0400
Re: THANK YOU Elizabeth D Rather <erather@forth.com> - 2013-06-17 14:29 -1000
Re: THANK YOU Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2013-06-11 17:25 -0700
Re: THANK YOU "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-06-17 21:19 -0400
Re: THANK YOU "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2013-06-18 02:05 +0000
Re: THANK YOU Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-06-17 21:27 -0700
Re: OT was, [Re: THANK YOU] "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-06-18 21:34 -0400
OT Re: THANK YOU albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-06-18 14:53 +0000
Re: THANK YOU Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-06-10 14:11 -0700
Re: THANK YOU rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-06-10 19:08 -0400
Re: THANK YOU <fred@example.com> - 2013-06-11 13:02 +0100
Re: THANK YOU albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-06-11 12:49 +0000
Re: THANK YOU Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-06-11 00:44 -0700
Re: THANK YOU Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2013-06-11 18:08 -0700
Re: THANK YOU Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-06-12 01:14 -0700
Re: THANK YOU "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-06-12 08:03 -1000
Re: THANK YOU Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2013-06-12 18:09 -0700
Re: THANK YOU albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-06-13 10:45 +0000
Re: THANK YOU Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-06-13 03:53 -0700
Re: THANK YOU "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-06-13 07:37 -1000
Re: THANK YOU Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2013-06-13 19:01 -0700
Re: THANK YOU "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-06-17 20:12 -0400
Re: THANK YOU rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-06-15 11:45 -0400
Re: THANK YOU "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-06-17 20:25 -0400
csiph-web