Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #22430

Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang?

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx05.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang?
Date Wed, 08 May 2013 02:03:08 -0700
Organization Nightsong/Fort GNOX
Lines 5
Message-ID <7xip2tetdf.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> (permalink)
References <4cf6d874-adaa-4dc0-9ff4-7a8d45dc455c@googlegroups.com> <klr03f$isv$1@speranza.aioe.org> <_b-dnTif5YYWsxzMnZ2dnUVZ_qidnZ2d@supernews.com> <72351a29-1334-4832-86ff-92186fdf0ef4@tz3g2000pbb.googlegroups.com> <km158i$3lv$1@speranza.aioe.org> <S-6dncHYyamWohnMnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@supernews.com> <km4oal$ro0$1@speranza.aioe.org> <NMmdncFxIf4evxvMnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d@supernews.com> <9f03dd55-be1e-4a8f-b7f2-989b543aebc7@googlegroups.com> <kmc0ng$8ig$1@speranza.aioe.org> <d4udnRHeW9hVmRfMnZ2dnUVZ_t-dnZ2d@supernews.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="d94d289a4df6ae47ea4d4f8b2ae808e7"; logging-data="18272"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18DOs2jbrI4kp/1Q1tvvmB5"
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock sha1:BrQ0guo1HiYpJt2kNj6wN0gcVZU= sha1:nD6hUmIdZliXDSMqX4nSTK3csMo=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.forth:22430

Show key headers only | View raw


Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> writes:
> Well, yes.  When someone pontificates from a position of almost total
> ignorance about a project I'm involved in I get angry.

Oh noes!  Someone is wrong on the internet!

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-04-30 15:12 -0700
  Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2013-04-30 20:52 -0700
    Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-05-03 15:59 -0700
  Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-05-01 08:02 -0400
    Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Mark Wills <forthfreak@gmail.com> - 2013-05-01 05:33 -0700
    Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-01 10:02 -0500
      Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-01 15:28 -0700
        Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-05-03 16:07 -0400
          Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-03 17:49 -0500
            Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-05-05 00:51 -0400
              Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-05 04:12 -0500
                Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-05-06 23:17 -0700
                Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? AKE <assadebrahim2000@gmail.com> - 2013-05-07 10:36 -0700
                Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-05-07 18:57 -0400
                Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-08 02:54 -0500
                Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-08 02:03 -0700
                Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-08 12:18 -0500
                Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-05-08 20:53 -0700
                Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-05-07 14:25 -0700
    Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-05-03 16:00 -0700

csiph-web