Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.forth > #22230

Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang?

Show all headers | View raw

On Tuesday, April 30, 2013 8:52:36 PM UTC-7, Hugh Aguilar wrote:
> On Apr 30, 3:12 pm, the_gavino_himself <visphatesj...@gmail.com>
> 
> wrote:
> 
> > curious
> 
> >
> 
> > I got a book on go from library and seems like tcl on roids with csp.
> 
> >
> 
> > arrays
> 
> > slices
> 
> > maps
> 
> > the csp for co prcessing
> 
> > dense book painful to read by sommerfield or someone
> 
> >
> 
> > forth must be easier
> 
> 
> 
> It is nonsense to say: "Forthers still unimpressed with Go lang." That
> 
> is just troll-talk: "My language can beat up your language." As I've
> 
> said many times --- whatever language that a person uses to write a
> 
> program that works, is the best language. The point of programming, is
> 
> to write programs --- not to be an expert on programming languages.
> 
> 
> 
> I am currently reading Mark Summerfield's book: "Programming in Go."
> 
> 
> 
> Gavino, I think that all books are painful for you to read ---
> 
> probably painful for the book too, if books had feelings.

huge, sounds like you need a handjob from a tranny man, are you in a bad mood? You are usually on my side here..

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-04-30 15:12 -0700
  Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2013-04-30 20:52 -0700
    Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-05-03 15:59 -0700
  Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-05-01 08:02 -0400
    Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Mark Wills <forthfreak@gmail.com> - 2013-05-01 05:33 -0700
    Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-01 10:02 -0500
      Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-01 15:28 -0700
        Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-05-03 16:07 -0400
          Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-03 17:49 -0500
            Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-05-05 00:51 -0400
              Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-05 04:12 -0500
                Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-05-06 23:17 -0700
                Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? AKE <assadebrahim2000@gmail.com> - 2013-05-07 10:36 -0700
                Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-05-07 18:57 -0400
                Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-08 02:54 -0500
                Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-08 02:03 -0700
                Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-08 12:18 -0500
                Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-05-08 20:53 -0700
                Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-05-07 14:25 -0700
    Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-05-03 16:00 -0700

csiph-web