Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang?

From	Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid>
Subject	Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang?
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
References	(7 earlier) <NMmdncFxIf4evxvMnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d@supernews.com> <9f03dd55-be1e-4a8f-b7f2-989b543aebc7@googlegroups.com> <kmc0ng$8ig$1@speranza.aioe.org> <d4udnRHeW9hVmRfMnZ2dnUVZ_t-dnZ2d@supernews.com> <7xip2tetdf.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com>
Message-ID	<SIadnYoLCcRHFRfMnZ2dnUVZ_t6dnZ2d@supernews.com> (permalink)
Date	2013-05-08 12:18 -0500

Show all headers | View raw

Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> writes:
>> Well, yes.  When someone pontificates from a position of almost total
>> ignorance about a project I'm involved in I get angry.
> 
> Oh noes!  Someone is wrong on the internet!

Oh, God.  You're probably right.  :-)

Andrew.

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-04-30 15:12 -0700
  Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2013-04-30 20:52 -0700
    Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-05-03 15:59 -0700
  Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-05-01 08:02 -0400
    Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Mark Wills <forthfreak@gmail.com> - 2013-05-01 05:33 -0700
    Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-01 10:02 -0500
      Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-01 15:28 -0700
        Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-05-03 16:07 -0400
          Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-03 17:49 -0500
            Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-05-05 00:51 -0400
              Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-05 04:12 -0500
                Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-05-06 23:17 -0700
                Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? AKE <assadebrahim2000@gmail.com> - 2013-05-07 10:36 -0700
                Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-05-07 18:57 -0400
                Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-08 02:54 -0500
                Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-08 02:03 -0700
                Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-08 12:18 -0500
                Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-05-08 20:53 -0700
                Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-05-07 14:25 -0700
    Re: are forthers still unimpressed with go lang? the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-05-03 16:00 -0700

csiph-web