Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.basic.visual.misc > #1003
| From | "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.basic.visual.misc |
| Subject | Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty |
| Date | 2012-03-20 10:29 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <jk9m5j$o9v$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <b04em7pesmti0o85092bdksbqrb9l1hov8@4ax.com> <26795801.2392.1332162041006.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbkc1> <14127446.381.1332176755304.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbbp15> <jk7v1q$dgg$1@dont-email.me> <18949830.2160.1332197425379.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbux23> |
<peter.lawton@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:18949830.2160.1332197425379.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbux23...
> Your experiment on your wife's computer - where was the
> VB5 application residing? Was it in Program files (x86)?
Initially it was in a folder on the desktop, just as a quick test, and it
worked fine there. I then placed it into a folder in Program Files (X86) and
it worked fine there as well. The important thing is that, wherever it was,
the msvbvm50.dll was in the same folder with it. These were manual tests
though, where I placed the folder with the VB5 application and the
msvbvm50.dll file manually onto the machine, and I did it that way simply to
prove (at least to myself on the machines I currently have access to) that a
VB5 application will happily run when the only copy of msvbvm50.dll is in
the same folder with it, whether that copy of msvbvm50.dll is registered or
not. The same is true for a VB6 application (on machines where msvbvm60.dll
is deliberately unregistered and all references to it removed from the
registry), except that in a recent thread here we established that for one
specific thing to work (VB6 PropertyBags) a registered copy of msvbvm60.dll
is required.
> I do have two users reporting install failure on 64 bit
> machines, and with the same error message, referring
> to msvbvm50.dll. Something's going on....
Yep, clearly something is going wrong there. It could be anti virus action,
as both I and others have suggested, although in my own experience the more
aggressive anti virus programs, such as the Sonar protection in Norton, tend
to pull the plug only when you do something they regard as suspicious, such
as running a compiled exe within a batch file. However, I think is what you
were doing at one stage? (I've lost track of the details now). On my wife's
Win7 64 bit machine Norton's Sonar was deleting the VB5 program under such
circumstances, but other things on other machines might delete the DLL it is
attempting to use. Clearly, using a batch file for such things is going to
lead to problems on some machines.
I think it would be best to stay away from batch files anyway for such
purposes because Windows itself can cause problems when you use a batch file
to run a compiled exe. For example, I have just turned off Norton's Sonar
for a while so it does not get in the way and I used the following simple
batch file to run a compiled exe (the exe in the same folder as the batch
file):
start mike.exe
It works fine when you run the batch file normally, and mike.exe runs.
However, if you run the batch file using Run as Administrator then it fails
and Windows pops up the error message "Windows cannot find mike.exe",
although of course mike.exe is clearly there and nothing either now or later
deletes it under these circumstances. This happens both on my wife's
Windows7 64 bit machine and on my own Vista 32 bit machine. At first I
thought it might be because Windows did not like piggy backing under such
circumstances but it still happens even if I embed an Admin Privileges
manifest into mike.exe. I haven't looked any further into it yet, and I
probably won't do, but I think in general that batch files should be avoided
for such things.
> I've got VB6, Mike, although I've never installed or used it.
> I just didn't realise it was relevant until mayana pointed out
> that the VB6 runtimes come with Windows.
That's good, and it makes all the above a bit academic now, but it was an
interesting exercise nonetheless ;-)
Mike
Back to comp.lang.basic.visual.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
64 bit Windows install difficulty peter.lawton@blueyonder.co.uk - 2012-03-15 16:25 -0700
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2012-03-15 20:34 -0500
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty peter.lawton@blueyonder.co.uk - 2012-03-16 08:49 -0700
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2012-03-16 12:33 -0500
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty H-Man <Spam@bites.fs> - 2012-03-16 13:53 -0600
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty "Farnsworth" <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-03-16 21:56 -0500
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty peter.lawton@blueyonder.co.uk - 2012-03-18 06:23 -0700
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-03-18 15:51 +0000
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty peter.lawton@blueyonder.co.uk - 2012-03-18 11:07 -0700
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2012-03-18 13:38 -0500
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-03-18 20:41 +0000
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty peter.lawton@blueyonder.co.uk - 2012-03-18 14:06 -0700
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-03-18 22:43 +0000
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2012-03-18 18:49 -0400
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-03-18 23:09 +0000
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2012-03-18 19:15 -0400
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2012-03-18 19:26 -0400
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty "Farnsworth" <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-03-18 11:54 -0500
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty peter.lawton@blueyonder.co.uk - 2012-03-18 11:47 -0700
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty "Farnsworth" <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-03-18 19:09 -0500
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2012-03-18 22:11 -0500
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty peter.lawton@blueyonder.co.uk - 2012-03-19 01:07 -0700
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-03-19 10:14 +0000
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty peter.lawton@blueyonder.co.uk - 2012-03-19 05:03 -0700
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2012-03-19 07:20 -0500
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-03-19 14:55 +0000
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2012-03-19 07:05 -0500
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty peter.lawton@blueyonder.co.uk - 2012-03-19 06:00 -0700
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2012-03-19 09:31 -0500
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2012-03-19 10:15 -0500
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty peter.lawton@blueyonder.co.uk - 2012-03-19 08:18 -0700
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2012-03-19 09:36 -0500
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty peter.lawton@blueyonder.co.uk - 2012-03-19 10:05 -0700
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-03-19 18:48 +0000
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty peter.lawton@blueyonder.co.uk - 2012-03-19 15:50 -0700
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2012-03-19 20:42 -0500
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-03-20 11:09 +0000
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2012-03-20 08:32 -0500
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty peter.lawton@blueyonder.co.uk - 2012-03-20 08:52 -0700
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty "Farnsworth" <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-03-20 15:34 -0500
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2012-03-20 16:07 -0500
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty "Farnsworth" <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-03-21 14:00 -0500
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2012-03-21 14:20 -0500
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-03-20 10:29 +0000
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty peter.lawton@blueyonder.co.uk - 2012-03-20 08:46 -0700
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2012-03-19 20:12 -0500
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty peter.lawton@blueyonder.co.uk - 2012-03-21 01:29 -0700
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-03-21 09:57 +0000
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty peter.lawton@blueyonder.co.uk - 2012-03-21 04:57 -0700
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-03-21 13:14 +0000
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-03-21 15:29 +0000
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty peter.lawton@blueyonder.co.uk - 2012-03-21 09:47 -0700
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-03-22 11:11 +0000
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty chinamicah@gmail.com - 2012-04-15 16:12 -0700
Re: 64 bit Windows install difficulty "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2012-03-19 09:32 -0500
csiph-web