Groups > comp.lang.basic.visual.misc > #643

Re: The Beep Function.

From	"DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.basic.visual.misc
Subject	Re: The Beep Function.
Date	2012-01-13 15:09 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<jephep$j4p$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(6 earlier) <7a47f23c-fede-4d93-b47b-e27a16513308@n30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <jek9e6$85e$1@dont-email.me> <ff462f86-bd0b-42bf-b52d-16eb4e1c792e@t8g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> <jep386$7m8$1@dont-email.me> <b064af06-d5b9-4181-8d1a-d5e2d3e0b073@r5g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

"Peter Nolan" <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:b064af06-d5b9-4181-8d1a-d5e2d3e0b073@r5g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 13, 11:06 am, "DaveO" <d...@dial.pipex.com> wrote:
> "Peter Nolan" <peter.nola...@gmail.com> wrote in message

>we are only
>beginning to see uses for the PC it has been out of date for years
>because M$ has the whole thing tied up forcing companies like Intel,
>who have a huge plant right here in Ireland employing 5000, to
>continue to make CPU's that should be upgraded many fold so much so
>that we could look ahead to the distant future by building in
>advancements that would anticipate great developments in the decades
>to follow meaning that CPU's that could be designed today wouldn't go
>out of date for a long time.

You seem to be at cross purposes there, you bemoan the fact that CPUs have 
remained backward and forward compatible for a long time, then say the 
design should be updated so it can be compatible for a long time.

While the current CPU architecture does have its roots in the 8086 chip from 
when dinosaurs roamed the Earth there have been many changes but both Intel 
and AMD have still maintained some compatibility which is a remarkable 
achievement.

There have been many alternative chip designs over the years (remember the 
world changing Transputer?) and there will continue to be more in the future 
but regrettably the vast majority of users are mired in the Windows 
ecosystem and that (at least for now) means they have to use chips that are 
descendants of the venerable 8086.

CPUs as such don't go out of date, you can still do useful work with a Z80 
in fact many process controllers are little more than a Z80 with a few I/O 
circuits and some memory on a single chip, the reason processors have 
increased in capability since the 8086 is the demands put on them by 
software, if you don't want whizzy graphics and keep off-line then a 80286 
running DOS, Windows 3.11 or even Gem will work exactly as well today as the 
day it was fresh and shiny. Don't forget that the entire Apollo program ran 
on less computing power than a contemporary bottom of the range mobile 
phone.

Regards

DaveO

Back to comp.lang.basic.visual.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-04 06:15 -0800
  Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-04 07:11 -0800
  Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-04 15:38 +0000
  Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-04 16:16 +0000
    Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-04 10:15 -0800
      Re: The Beep Function. Jim Mack <no-uce-ube@mdxi.com> - 2012-01-04 13:46 -0500
        Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-05 08:09 -0800
      Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-04 22:24 +0000
      Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-05 08:22 +0000
      Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-05 09:21 +0000
        Re: The Beep Function. Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2012-01-05 21:54 +1100
          Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-05 11:33 +0000
            Re: The Beep Function. Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2012-01-06 00:20 +1100
              Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-05 17:46 +0000
                Re: The Beep Function. "blank" <blank@blankety.blank.com> - 2012-01-06 14:03 +1100
                Re: The Beep Function. Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2012-01-08 00:43 +1100
                Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-07 20:53 +0000
                Re: The Beep Function. Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2012-01-08 17:27 +1100
                Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-08 09:49 +0000
                Re: The Beep Function. "blank" <blank@blankety.blank.com> - 2012-01-08 08:00 +1100
                Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-07 22:43 +0000
      Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-05 14:13 +0000
        Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-05 08:26 -0800
        Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-05 08:04 -0800
        Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-07 04:41 -0800
          Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-08 11:19 +0000
        Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-10 04:52 -0800
          Re: The Beep Function. "Thorsten Albers" <gudea@gmx.de> - 2012-01-10 13:01 +0000
          Re: The Beep Function. Jim Mack <no-uce-ube@mdxi.com> - 2012-01-10 11:44 -0500
            Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-11 05:58 -0800
          Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-10 17:19 +0000
            Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-11 05:54 -0800
              Re: The Beep Function. "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-01-11 15:21 +0000
                Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-12 08:04 -0800
                Re: The Beep Function. "blank" <blank@blankety.blank.com> - 2012-01-13 12:40 +1100
                Re: The Beep Function. ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2012-01-12 21:28 -0600
                Re: The Beep Function. "blank" <blank@blankety.blank.com> - 2012-01-13 15:34 +1100
                Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-13 05:25 -0800
                Re: The Beep Function. "blank" <blank@blankety.blank.com> - 2012-01-14 07:32 +1100
                Re: The Beep Function. "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-01-13 11:06 +0000
                Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-13 05:48 -0800
                Re: The Beep Function. "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-01-13 15:09 +0000
                Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-14 04:29 -0800
                Re: The Beep Function. Helmut_Meukel <Helmut_Meukel@bn-hof.invalid> - 2012-01-14 14:56 +0100
                Re: The Beep Function. ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2012-01-14 10:24 -0600
                Re: The Beep Function. Helmut_Meukel <Helmut_Meukel@bn-hof.invalid> - 2012-01-14 18:51 +0100
                Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-15 03:39 -0800
                Re: The Beep Function. Schmidt <sss@online.de> - 2012-01-15 17:39 +0100
                Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-16 05:21 -0800
                Re: The Beep Function. "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-01-16 14:39 +0000
                Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-17 04:13 -0800
                Re: The Beep Function. "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-01-17 14:17 +0000
                Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-17 07:22 -0800
                Re: The Beep Function. "Henning" <computer_hero@coldmail.com> - 2012-01-17 17:47 +0100
                Re: The Beep Function. "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-01-17 16:50 +0000
                Re: The Beep Function. "Henning" <computer_hero@coldmail.com> - 2012-01-17 18:22 +0100
                Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-18 05:26 -0800
                Re: The Beep Function. "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-01-18 14:35 +0000
                Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-18 07:10 -0800
                Re: The Beep Function. ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2012-01-18 10:38 -0600
                Re: The Beep Function. "blank" <blank@blankety.blank.com> - 2012-01-19 05:42 +1100
                Re: The Beep Function. "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-01-19 11:33 +0000
                Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-21 03:16 -0800
                Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-19 05:17 -0800
                Re: The Beep Function. "blank" <blank@blankety.blank.com> - 2012-01-20 05:17 +1100
                Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-20 03:54 -0800
                Re: The Beep Function. Jason Keats <jkeats@melbpcDeleteThis.org.au> - 2012-01-20 23:40 +1100
                Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-21 03:20 -0800
                Re: The Beep Function. "blank" <blank@blankety.blank.com> - 2012-01-21 15:20 +1100
                Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-21 03:23 -0800
                Re: The Beep Function. "blank" <blank@blankety.blank.com> - 2012-01-20 05:11 +1100
                Re: The Beep Function. Schmidt <sss@online.de> - 2012-01-17 18:58 +0100
                Re: The Beep Function. Helmut_Meukel <Helmut_Meukel@bn-hof.invalid> - 2012-01-17 23:13 +0100
                Re: The Beep Function. "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-01-18 09:12 +0000
                Re: The Beep Function. "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-01-18 09:22 +0000
                Re: The Beep Function. ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2012-01-18 05:39 -0600
                Re: The Beep Function. Helmut_Meukel <Helmut_Meukel@bn-hof.invalid> - 2012-01-18 13:32 +0100
                Re: The Beep Function. ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2012-01-15 13:30 -0600
                Re: The Beep Function. "blank" <blank@blankety.blank.com> - 2012-01-16 06:59 +1100
                Re: The Beep Function. "blank" <blank@blankety.blank.com> - 2012-01-16 06:55 +1100
                Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-16 06:06 -0800
                Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-13 22:34 +0000
                Re: The Beep Function. "blank" <blank@blankety.blank.com> - 2012-01-14 19:50 +1100
                Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-14 05:10 -0800
                Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-14 06:16 -0800
  Re: The Beep Function. "Henning" <computer_hero@coldmail.com> - 2012-01-19 20:25 +0100
    Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-20 03:56 -0800

csiph-web