Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.basic.visual.misc > #513

Re: RichEdit control question

Show all headers | View raw

| I'll just have to keep looking. Maybe I will have to simply do
| search/replace of rtf tags. But it takes a long time....
|

I did a test to see whether <34556> would be recognized
as a word, with the idea that you could do something like:

(aircode here)

LSt = 0
Do
i2 = RTB.Find(LSt, "<")
i2 = i2 + 1
RTB.SelStart = i2
SendMessageAny hRTB, EM_SETCHARFORMAT, SCF_SELECTION Or SCF_WORD, CF2
LSt = i2
Loop

SCF_WORD is supposed to hide the word where SelStart
is, but it didn't recognize <###> as a word. So....

  You could just maintain a numeric record of offset and
length of each hidden text section, but that would have to
update for each change in the RTB.

  In my experience it's by far the fastest and easiest to tokenize
the RTF text. We had a long, involved discussion of this topic
some years ago. At the time I put together a test project.
If you know VB6 and have a way to load a VB6 project you
might find the code useful:

http://www.jsware.net/jsware/test/rtbtest.zip

  The sample does something like what you want, except
that it's identifying text to be colored rather than text
to be hidden. But the basic operation is the same. It tokenizes
the text string by pointing an integer array at it and treating the
characters as numbers. It rebuilds a new string bit by bit using
the VB Mid statement, which seems to be essentially a way to
input text into an array. In other words, it works extremely
fast by avoiding string allocation operations. If you can use
a similar approach in VB.Net then once you've set up the
tokenizing routine you have a great deal of adaptibility. Hiding
or unhiding text becomes very fast and simple, by looking for
< and then >, and then adding or not adding the visibility
marker. Then adding anything else, like coloring, bold, italic,
edits, etc. becomes just a simple addition to the tokenizer
routine, with the complexity of the tokenizer having very little
effect on overall speed.

Back to comp.lang.basic.visual.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

RichEdit control question Kalkidas <eat@joes.pub> - 2011-10-10 14:41 -0700
  Re: RichEdit control question "Nobody" <nobody@nobody.com> - 2011-10-11 00:53 -0400
  Re: RichEdit control question BTIS Jeff <btisjb@gmail.com> - 2011-10-11 08:17 -0700
    Re: RichEdit control question Kalkidas <eat@joes.pub> - 2011-10-11 14:17 -0700
      Re: RichEdit control question "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2011-10-11 22:27 +0100
        Re: RichEdit control question Kalkidas <eat@joes.pub> - 2011-10-11 14:59 -0700
          Re: RichEdit control question "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2011-10-12 08:00 +0100
            Re: RichEdit control question Kalkidas <eat@joes.pub> - 2011-10-12 16:18 -0700
              Re: RichEdit control question Deanna Earley <dee.earley@icode.co.uk> - 2011-10-13 08:45 +0100
              Re: RichEdit control question "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2011-10-13 10:24 +0100
              Re: RichEdit control question "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2011-10-13 11:41 +0100
              Re: RichEdit control question "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2011-10-13 13:30 +0100
  Re: RichEdit control question Eric Coleman <eric@strategon.com> - 2011-10-13 19:55 -0500
    Re: RichEdit control question "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2011-10-14 09:30 +0100
    Re: RichEdit control question Kalkidas <eat@joes.pub> - 2011-10-15 07:53 -0700
      Re: RichEdit control question "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2011-10-15 17:03 +0100
      Re: RichEdit control question ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-10-15 12:25 -0500
        Re: RichEdit control question ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-10-15 12:29 -0500
        Re: RichEdit control question Kalkidas <eat@joes.pub> - 2011-10-15 12:45 -0700
          Re: RichEdit control question ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-10-15 15:24 -0500
          Re: RichEdit control question "Thorsten Albers" <gudea@gmx.de> - 2011-10-15 23:16 +0000
            Re: RichEdit control question Kalkidas <eat@joes.pub> - 2011-10-16 18:21 -0700
              Re: RichEdit control question "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2011-10-16 23:15 -0400
              Re: RichEdit control question "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2011-10-17 17:19 -0400
                Re: RichEdit control question Kalkidas <eat@joes.pub> - 2011-10-17 15:59 -0700
                Re: RichEdit control question "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2011-10-17 19:59 -0400
                Re: RichEdit control question Kalkidas <eat@joes.pub> - 2011-10-17 17:34 -0700
                Re: RichEdit control question "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2011-10-17 23:46 -0400
                Re: RichEdit control question Kalkidas <eat@joes.pub> - 2011-10-18 07:35 -0700
                Re: RichEdit control question "Thorsten Albers" <gudea@gmx.de> - 2011-10-18 15:17 +0000
                Re: RichEdit control question "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2011-10-19 10:09 -0400
                Re: RichEdit control question "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2011-10-19 18:26 +0100
          Re: RichEdit control question "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2011-10-15 19:53 -0400
            Re: RichEdit control question "Thorsten Albers" <gudea@gmx.de> - 2011-10-16 03:32 +0000
              Re: RichEdit control question "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2011-10-16 12:02 -0400
                Re: RichEdit control question "Thorsten Albers" <gudea@gmx.de> - 2011-10-16 22:10 +0000
                Re: RichEdit control question "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2011-10-16 19:17 -0400
                Re: RichEdit control question "Thorsten Albers" <gudea@gmx.de> - 2011-10-17 09:43 +0000

csiph-web