Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.basic.visual.misc > #492
| From | "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.basic.visual.misc |
| Subject | Re: RichEdit control question |
| Date | 2011-10-15 17:03 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <j7cara$36q$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <j6vomu$ugh$1@dont-email.me> <j781an$4t9$1@speranza.aioe.org> <j7c6m8$8fo$1@dont-email.me> |
"Kalkidas" <eat@joes.pub> wrote in message news:j7c6m8$8fo$1@dont-email.me... >> On 10/13/2011 5:55 PM, Eric Coleman wrote: >> I wasn't sure what "hidden text" in MS Word actually meant, so I >> tested it out. It looks like you can accomplish the same thing with >> some sort of custom table you create, and then iterate through to >> replace the "hidden text" with something else. > > MS Word can toggle hidden text off/on almost instantaneously, > even in huge files with thousands of instances of hidden words. > This indicates that it is not using a process of iteration, but is > toggling some global feature. I think that perhaps Eric Coleman thought you were talking about a need to mark all instances of specific words or phrases in a document as hidden. That's certainly what I thought you were talking about, and that would definitely require a method which iterates through the rtf file looking for each occurrence of the specific word or phrase and individually marking them as hidden. However, it appears that is not what you actually want and it seems that you have a file in which specific words or phrases are already marked as hidden, or that you already have your own method of marking them so, or that you are doing so manually as you edit the document, and what you really want is to discover the richedit control's method of actually displaying or not displaying those 'already marked as hidden' words or phrases, which of course certainly can be done with a single switch and WHICH does not require iteration since it is merely an instruction as to how the control should behave when drawing the output. So it looks like we were both talking about different things. Mike
Back to comp.lang.basic.visual.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
RichEdit control question Kalkidas <eat@joes.pub> - 2011-10-10 14:41 -0700
Re: RichEdit control question "Nobody" <nobody@nobody.com> - 2011-10-11 00:53 -0400
Re: RichEdit control question BTIS Jeff <btisjb@gmail.com> - 2011-10-11 08:17 -0700
Re: RichEdit control question Kalkidas <eat@joes.pub> - 2011-10-11 14:17 -0700
Re: RichEdit control question "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2011-10-11 22:27 +0100
Re: RichEdit control question Kalkidas <eat@joes.pub> - 2011-10-11 14:59 -0700
Re: RichEdit control question "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2011-10-12 08:00 +0100
Re: RichEdit control question Kalkidas <eat@joes.pub> - 2011-10-12 16:18 -0700
Re: RichEdit control question Deanna Earley <dee.earley@icode.co.uk> - 2011-10-13 08:45 +0100
Re: RichEdit control question "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2011-10-13 10:24 +0100
Re: RichEdit control question "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2011-10-13 11:41 +0100
Re: RichEdit control question "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2011-10-13 13:30 +0100
Re: RichEdit control question Eric Coleman <eric@strategon.com> - 2011-10-13 19:55 -0500
Re: RichEdit control question "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2011-10-14 09:30 +0100
Re: RichEdit control question Kalkidas <eat@joes.pub> - 2011-10-15 07:53 -0700
Re: RichEdit control question "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2011-10-15 17:03 +0100
Re: RichEdit control question ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-10-15 12:25 -0500
Re: RichEdit control question ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-10-15 12:29 -0500
Re: RichEdit control question Kalkidas <eat@joes.pub> - 2011-10-15 12:45 -0700
Re: RichEdit control question ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-10-15 15:24 -0500
Re: RichEdit control question "Thorsten Albers" <gudea@gmx.de> - 2011-10-15 23:16 +0000
Re: RichEdit control question Kalkidas <eat@joes.pub> - 2011-10-16 18:21 -0700
Re: RichEdit control question "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2011-10-16 23:15 -0400
Re: RichEdit control question "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2011-10-17 17:19 -0400
Re: RichEdit control question Kalkidas <eat@joes.pub> - 2011-10-17 15:59 -0700
Re: RichEdit control question "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2011-10-17 19:59 -0400
Re: RichEdit control question Kalkidas <eat@joes.pub> - 2011-10-17 17:34 -0700
Re: RichEdit control question "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2011-10-17 23:46 -0400
Re: RichEdit control question Kalkidas <eat@joes.pub> - 2011-10-18 07:35 -0700
Re: RichEdit control question "Thorsten Albers" <gudea@gmx.de> - 2011-10-18 15:17 +0000
Re: RichEdit control question "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2011-10-19 10:09 -0400
Re: RichEdit control question "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2011-10-19 18:26 +0100
Re: RichEdit control question "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2011-10-15 19:53 -0400
Re: RichEdit control question "Thorsten Albers" <gudea@gmx.de> - 2011-10-16 03:32 +0000
Re: RichEdit control question "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2011-10-16 12:02 -0400
Re: RichEdit control question "Thorsten Albers" <gudea@gmx.de> - 2011-10-16 22:10 +0000
Re: RichEdit control question "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2011-10-16 19:17 -0400
Re: RichEdit control question "Thorsten Albers" <gudea@gmx.de> - 2011-10-17 09:43 +0000
csiph-web