Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.games.development.programming.algorithms > #89
| Path | csiph.com!au2pb.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!cyclone02.ams2.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!voer-me.highwinds-media.com!news.ziggo.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.lang.borland-delphi, comp.arch, comp.games.development.programming.algorithms, rec.games.corewar, sci.electronics.design |
| References | <e74d2$55c4fc77$5419aafe$48257@news.ziggo.nl> <b6407$55c4fe50$5419aafe$50369@news.ziggo.nl> |
| In-Reply-To | <b6407$55c4fe50$5419aafe$50369@news.ziggo.nl> |
| Subject | Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. |
| Date | Fri, 7 Aug 2015 20:58:40 +0200 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=response |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Priority | 3 |
| X-MSMail-Priority | Normal |
| Importance | Normal |
| X-Newsreader | Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308 |
| X-MimeOLE | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308 |
| Message-ID | <47dde$55c4ffcd$5419aafe$51809@news.ziggo.nl> (permalink) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@ziggo.nl |
| Organization | Ziggo |
| Lines | 28 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 84.25.170.254 (84.25.170.254) |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Fri, 07 Aug 2015 20:58:21 +0200 |
| X-Trace | 47dde55c4ffcdf1bc0f5b51809 |
| X-Received-Bytes | 1989 |
| X-Received-Body-CRC | 745969869 |
| Xref | csiph.com alt.comp.lang.borland-delphi:6373 comp.arch:29073 comp.games.development.programming.algorithms:89 rec.games.corewar:3765 sci.electronics.design:371996 |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
Maybe many instructions possible, but perhaps not that many. All instruction combinations could be tested/brute forced against a large quantity of existing warriors. Then see which instruction works best to scan for, as a safe landing place, based on total score or so ? ;) Scan code might not even be required to learn which instruction is safest to land on. Simply all warriors could be tested, each instruction of theirs landed on or so... however multiple lands on it might make it a bit more difficult to test. This could also prevent having to test all possible instruction combinations. Now it would be a case of brute forcing the existing population... ofcourse the population could adept but still... nice idea(s)... What is then left to do is construct an adequate scanner that can find such instruction or instructions fast and land/spawn on it. Bye, Skybuck.
Back to comp.games.development.programming.algorithms | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-07 20:44 +0200
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-07 20:52 +0200
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-07 20:58 +0200
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2015-08-07 16:19 -0500
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-08 00:11 +0200
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-08 00:16 +0200
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2015-08-09 01:58 -0400
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 01:30 -0400
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-08 14:06 +0200
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2015-08-08 08:23 -0400
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Mike" <mike@mike.net> - 2015-08-08 11:02 -0400
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-08 20:07 +0200
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Shaun" <stereobuff07@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 22:24 -0500
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-09 14:20 +0200
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-10 05:17 +0200
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-10 20:03 +0200
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-08-11 08:45 +0200
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2015-08-11 03:31 -0400
csiph-web