Groups > comp.games.development.programming.algorithms > #89

Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war.

From	"Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups	alt.comp.lang.borland-delphi, comp.arch, comp.games.development.programming.algorithms, rec.games.corewar, sci.electronics.design
References	<e74d2$55c4fc77$5419aafe$48257@news.ziggo.nl> <b6407$55c4fe50$5419aafe$50369@news.ziggo.nl>
Subject	Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war.
Date	2015-08-07 20:58 +0200
Message-ID	<47dde$55c4ffcd$5419aafe$51809@news.ziggo.nl> (permalink)
Organization	Ziggo

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Maybe many instructions possible, but perhaps not that many.

All instruction combinations could be tested/brute forced against a large 
quantity of existing warriors.

Then see which instruction works best to scan for, as a safe landing place, 
based on total score or so ? ;)

Scan code might not even be required to learn which instruction is safest to 
land on.

Simply all warriors could be tested, each instruction of theirs landed on or 
so... however multiple lands on it might make it a bit more difficult to 
test.

This could also prevent having to test all possible instruction 
combinations.

Now it would be a case of brute forcing the existing population... ofcourse 
the population could adept but still... nice idea(s)...

What is then left to do is construct an adequate scanner that can find such 
instruction or instructions fast and land/spawn on it.

Bye,
  Skybuck.

Back to comp.games.development.programming.algorithms | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-07 20:44 +0200
  Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-07 20:52 +0200
    Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-07 20:58 +0200
  Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2015-08-07 16:19 -0500
    Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-08 00:11 +0200
      Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-08 00:16 +0200
      Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2015-08-09 01:58 -0400
  Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 01:30 -0400
  Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-08 14:06 +0200
    Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2015-08-08 08:23 -0400
  Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Mike" <mike@mike.net> - 2015-08-08 11:02 -0400
    Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-08 20:07 +0200
  Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Shaun" <stereobuff07@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 22:24 -0500
    Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-09 14:20 +0200
      Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-10 05:17 +0200
        Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-10 20:03 +0200
          Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-08-11 08:45 +0200
            Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2015-08-11 03:31 -0400

csiph-web