Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.games.development.programming.algorithms > #90
| From | Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> |
|---|---|
| Organization | Washington University |
| Date | 2015-08-07 16:19 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. |
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.lang.borland-delphi, comp.arch, comp.games.development.programming.algorithms, rec.games.corewar, sci.electronics.design |
| References | <e74d2$55c4fc77$5419aafe$48257@news.ziggo.nl> |
| Followup-To | Choose, an, appropriate, group, to, redirect, replies... |
| Message-ID | <k6OdnU3l190AvVjInZ2dnUU7-UmdnZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
Followups directed to: Choose, an, appropriate, group, to, redirect, replies...
Skybuck Flying wrote: > Hello, > > Have you ever wondered, what would happen if the other side launched their > missiles, starting a nuclear war ? > > Let's suppose the Russians launch all nukes at USA. > > The USA General is faced with a slight dilemma... if he/she launches > too... or the president/whatever... then he/she may be deciding the faith > of humanity: "total destruction" / "end of humanity". > > What to do ? Launch or not Launch ? Is there an alternative ? =D > > Today I present to you an alternative: > > Instead of counter-launching everything, the conclusion could be: > > 1. USA is doomed, the nuclear missiles cannot all be stopped, most of the > land will be radiated. > > Let's assume the goal is to "maximize" survivability of the human race. > > Then the only option is not to launch their nuclear arsenal, because that > would radiate russia too and the rest of the world. > > So the logical conclusion seems to be: > > 2. Don't radiatate Russia back... instead order a massive evacuation of > the USA Except you have less than 10 minutes to evacuate the country! Think you can do that? Check out how long it takes to evacuate a town when there's a hurricane bearing down, or a forest fire. Jon
Back to comp.games.development.programming.algorithms | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-07 20:44 +0200
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-07 20:52 +0200
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-07 20:58 +0200
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2015-08-07 16:19 -0500
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-08 00:11 +0200
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-08 00:16 +0200
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2015-08-09 01:58 -0400
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 01:30 -0400
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-08 14:06 +0200
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2015-08-08 08:23 -0400
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Mike" <mike@mike.net> - 2015-08-08 11:02 -0400
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-08 20:07 +0200
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Shaun" <stereobuff07@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 22:24 -0500
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-09 14:20 +0200
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-10 05:17 +0200
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-10 20:03 +0200
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-08-11 08:45 +0200
Re: An alternative outcome of nuclear war. DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2015-08-11 03:31 -0400
csiph-web