Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #32505
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> |
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design, comp.arch.embedded |
| Subject | Re: good post on LinkedIn |
| Date | Sun, 1 Feb 2026 01:31:50 +1100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 112 |
| Message-ID | <10ll3os$2vgls$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <a466fba3-4f96-5968-faef-db94f1e721a5@insomnia247.nl> <10lhaak$1qjs6$1@dont-email.me> <1rpqslw.5dmmjjwws88wN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <10liadf$23qkg$1@dont-email.me> <1rpr404.iw4vr1dacqtvN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <10lii4e$26717$1@dont-email.me> <30lpnkp9erjgkk0hr8lrbt3kjikbhjnqnn@4ax.com> <10linik$28gp2$1@dont-email.me> <10lj2lo$3vun0$1@paganini.bofh.team> <10lj90o$2e6gn$1@dont-email.me> <10ljcnb$lbm$1@paganini.bofh.team> <10lk2dc$2kic9$3@dont-email.me> <10ll0ac$9aeh$1@paganini.bofh.team> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Injection-Date | Sat, 31 Jan 2026 14:31:59 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | dont-email.me; posting-host="c7d2f7508b8e6c5aaf52e1efb2b209bc"; logging-data="3130044"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/u//49MqnRdscQRA4F6t7Q5GcFSRntf/c=" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla Thunderbird |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:1WJxsR2vGDp0ezCURrytINdEpeI= |
| X-Antivirus-Status | Clean |
| In-Reply-To | <10ll0ac$9aeh$1@paganini.bofh.team> |
| X-Antivirus | Norton (VPS 260131-2, 31/1/2026), Outbound message |
| Content-Language | en-US |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.electronics.design:739955 comp.arch.embedded:32505 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
On 1/02/2026 12:33 am, Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester wrote: > Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote: > |-------------------------------------------------------------------| > |"> N.B. Bill Sloman misused "learned" instead of "learnt". | > | | > |It's not a misuse, merely a regional variant." | > |-------------------------------------------------------------------| > > Dear Doctor Sloman, > > A use of "learned" instead of "learnt" is a regional misuse. A language is defined by what people say. I was brought up speaking English in Australia, and worked in England for 22 years, and in the Netherlands for 19 years. My wife was a psycholinguist, and I do know about regional variation. Anybody who labels regional variants as regional misuse is simply ignorant. > |--------------------------------------------------------| > |"Many Dutch kids learn French[. . .] from an early age."| > |--------------------------------------------------------| > > I used to be employed in the Netherlands by an employer whose > languages are French and English. The Anglophones who used to be > employed by this then employer then vastly outnumber the Francophones > who used to be employed by this employer then. And I was employed in the Netherlands - in Venlo - by Haffmans BV, where I talked Dutch unless I needed technical vocabulary, when I tended to switch to English. German was used from time to time, and I could mostly follow it > > A then Anglophone neigbour used to persecute a then workmate who > natively speaks French and who at that time used to work in French and > English, by repeatedly saying to him in English (not French) that he > must speak Dutch. My biggest problem with learning Dutch was people who wanted to practice their English on me. > A friend of Belgian nationality told me that persons of Dutch > nationality say things to her like "Wow! You can speak French!" > > I detected no-one in the Netherlands using French when I used to reside > there, except for coworkers. I got taught French in school in Tasmania - not all that well. I was good enough to let me read the Nouveau Traite de Chemie Minerale, which I needed to be able to do as a chemist. My German was a bit better, but definitely not fluent. > All then employees then in this section of this then employer are > Anglophones. A majority (55%) are Francophones, an unusually high > proportion. This then chief is natively a Francophone. English is this > project's language. > > A Dutch then company (before it went bust) on this project tried to > apply for money to a French centre for an unrelated project. This > Dutch ex-company's ex-chiefs are of Dutch nationality. They wanted to > know if a tender must show a proposed price including tax or excluding > tax. So they telephoned this French centre to ask. They did try > asking in broken French, but they rapidly reverted to English while > they frantically reached for their French dictionary to find a French > word for tax. Given this lack of preparation and given this > anti-engineering belief, this ex-company deservedly went bust. When I was working in England, several of the companies I worked for had dealings with the their French equivalents, and I spent about six months spending my working week in Paris with a small team of other engineers, flying back to England every weekend. I knew enough French to know that the first translation of an operating manual we had been given was total rubbish, but we'd co-opted a French engineer who normally lived and worked in Bristol, and he cleaned it up. > > |-----------------------------------------------------------------| > |"Many Dutch kids learn [. . .] German [. . .] from an early age."| > |-----------------------------------------------------------------| > > I bought German magazines from a person of Dutch nationality who used > to be raised in the Netherlands near the German border. He used to buy > them by short travels into Germmany. He did not have a good grasp of > German when I bought them, so he declined to use German. The Plattdeutch spoken just across the border from the Netherlands is very close to Dutch. > |----------------------------------------------------------| > |"Many Dutch kids learn [. . .] English from an early age."| > |----------------------------------------------------------| > > Yes. "Langenscheidt Expresskurs Niederländisch" alleges that persons > who speak Dutch are less good at English than they believe. I do not > detect so. https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steenkolenengels is famous in the Netherlands. I never ran into an actual example in my 19 years in the country. > > |---------------------------------------------------------| > |"Lots of Belgians are raised as French/Dutch bilinguals."| > |---------------------------------------------------------| > > Of course. "Wow! You can speak French!" said an aforementioned friend > of Belgian nationality acting like persons of Dutch > nationality. "Yeah. [She can speak ]A little[ French]." said she > herself as a response to downplay these amazements. > (S. HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/ fuer Kontaktdaten!) -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
good post on LinkedIn Niocláisín Cóilín de Ghlostéir <Master_Fontaine_is_dishonest@Strand_in_London.Gov.UK> - 2025-02-22 21:12 +0100
Re: good post on LinkedIn Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <Spamassassin@irrt.De> - 2025-08-29 16:16 +0200
Re: good post on LinkedIn Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-01-01 18:52 +0100
Re: good post on LinkedIn Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-01-02 01:40 +0000
Re: good post on LinkedIn Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-01-29 14:26 +0000
Re: good post on LinkedIn john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-01-29 09:04 -0800
Re: good post on LinkedIn Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-01-29 17:57 +0000
Re: good post on LinkedIn john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-01-29 10:59 -0800
Re: good post on LinkedIn Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-01-30 00:48 +0000
Re: good post on LinkedIn john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-01-29 17:01 -0800
Re: good post on LinkedIn Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-01-30 01:28 +0000
Re: good post on LinkedIn Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-01-30 15:14 +1100
Re: good post on LinkedIn john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-01-30 11:52 -0800
Re: good post on LinkedIn Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-01-31 16:05 +1100
Re: good post on LinkedIn Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-01-31 12:34 +0000
Re: good post on LinkedIn john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-01-31 07:29 -0800
Re: good post on LinkedIn Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-02-01 20:59 +1100
Re: good post on LinkedIn john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-01 03:06 -0800
Re: good post on LinkedIn Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-02-02 00:17 +1100
Re: Excel and accountants, good post on LinkedIn John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2026-01-31 23:21 +0000
Re: Excel and accountants, good post on LinkedIn john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-01-31 16:22 -0800
Re: Excel and accountants, good post on LinkedIn Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-02-01 02:13 +0000
Re: good post on LinkedIn Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-01-31 03:56 +0000
Re: good post on LinkedIn Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-01-31 15:23 +1100
Re: good post on LinkedIn Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-01-31 14:36 +0000
Re: good post on LinkedIn Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-02-01 21:31 +1100
Re: good post on LinkedIn Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-01-30 14:59 +1100
Re: good post on LinkedIn liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-01-30 10:15 +0000
Re: good post on LinkedIn Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-01-31 00:06 +1100
Re: good post on LinkedIn Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2026-01-30 15:06 +0100
Re: good post on LinkedIn john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-01-30 11:55 -0800
Re: good post on LinkedIn Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-01-31 13:33 +0000
Re: good post on LinkedIn Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-02-01 01:31 +1100
Re: good post on LinkedIn Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-01-31 19:16 +0000
Re: history of Fortran, good post on LinkedIn John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2026-01-31 23:10 +0000
Sorry re history of Fortran, good post on LinkedIn Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-01-31 23:25 +0000
Re: Sorry re history of Fortran, good post on LinkedIn John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2026-02-01 02:43 +0000
Re: Sorry re history of Fortran, good post on LinkedIn OrangeFish <OrangeFish@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-01 18:00 -0500
Re: Sorry re history of Fortran, good post on LinkedIn Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-02-18 14:56 +0000
Re: Sorry re history of Fortran, good post on LinkedIn John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2026-02-18 20:32 +0000
Re: Sorry re history of Fortran, good post on LinkedIn Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-02-18 23:20 +0000
Re: old new postings Sorry re history of Fortran, good post on LinkedIn John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2026-02-19 02:46 +0000
Re: old new postings Sorry re history of Fortran, good post on LinkedIn Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-02-19 11:33 +0000
Re: Sorry re history of Fortran, good post on LinkedIn George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2026-02-19 22:28 -0500
Re: history of Fortran, good post on LinkedIn albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2026-02-01 22:11 +0100
Re: good post on LinkedIn Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-02-01 21:36 +1100
Re: good post on LinkedIn Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-01-31 14:26 +0000
Re: good post on LinkedIn wmartin <wwm@wwmartin.net> - 2026-01-30 11:27 -0800
Re: good post on LinkedIn john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-01-30 18:54 -0800
Re: good post on LinkedIn Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-01-31 03:40 +0000
Re: good post on LinkedIn Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-01-31 15:20 +0000
Re: good post on LinkedIn Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-01-31 17:13 +0000
Re: good post on LinkedIn john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-01-31 07:55 -0800
Re: good post on LinkedIn Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-02-16 13:52 +0000
csiph-web