Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #220871
| From | Anastasios Lisgaras <tasosnumberten@yahoo.gr> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync |
| Date | 2020-04-04 14:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <zRPMB-jz-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <zNYY9-2RH-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <zO1Mm-4BC-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <zO6VI-7Jf-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <zO97c-xi-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <zOacV-1po-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 3/25/20 11:07 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > If a file is corrupted, deleted, etc. in one place that will be > propagated to all copies. > > Depending on the features provided by the synchronisation tool they > could be *a part* of a backup solution. > > See http://taobackup.com for what a complete backup solution should > provide. > > Kind regards, > Andrei > Sorry, but again, I don't see the problem. If I choose to delete a file from a machine - I will want the same for the rest of the machines. What's the problem with that? On 3/25/20 12:49 PM, Dan Purgert wrote: > I don't think he meant to imply using external-to-you "cloud" providers > (gdrive, dropbox), but rather creating his own personal "cloud". > > Be it something pretty -- Nextcloud, for example -- or something > utilitarian (a central NFS or SSHFS server holding all the data). > > I've used Nextcloud in these situations, it's actually pretty good with > slower connections. Since everything is a (machine-)local copy, in > addition to being stored centrally; something I work on "here(tm)" gets > updated "everywhere" shortly after I've saved the document. > > I've only really ever run into problems with it when there was a > godawful slow connection with a machine that'd been offline for 2 weeks > while I was on vacation (and I forgot to spin it up at home before > heading out) > I have also installed in the past the *Νextcloud* locally ( in a Raspberry Pi ) and it really worked amazingly! In fact, it worked so perfectly that, because of that I didn't deal with *Syncthing*. In fact, I could not understand their differences. Syncthing seems more restrictive than Nextcloud because it does not have the "cloud" (WEB UI) function offered by Nextcloud. However, I would really like to try Syncthing to see what it really offers and to be able to compare it with Nextcloud. What is your opinion? On 3/25/20 7:44 PM, Linux-Fan wrote: > Hello, > > there have been multiple answers already, so forgive me if my post does not > seem to add anything valuable. Still, it bugs me that there are many > different solutions proposed without their advantages and disadvantages > given? > > I think that it is an important factor how the systems "online status" (in > sense of power and networking) is to be considered? Are both systems online > simultaneously? Are both systems online at the same time only for > synchonization? > > I can think of different solutions depending on what is actually > wanted/neede: > > * Cluster File Systems. > People have already mentioned ceph (which is more an object storage > and thus slow on small files IIRC?). I can add OCFS (Oracle Cluster > File System) to the list, although it is not so easy to set up. > Cluster file systems make sense if both systems are online at the same > time and should both access a common file system. Often, cluster > file systems want a "third" machine for doing the actual storage work > (e.g. an iSCISI target of OCFS). I have also tried out GFS2 in the past, > but it is a PITA to set up! > > * Synchonization Tools. > There are tools to invoke explicitly to call the synchronization. > These make sense if both systems are online at the same time only > for synchronization... if not, one will need to deal with "both changed" > conflicts on a manual basis. I have no experience with syncthing > (mentioned in the thread) -- syncthing might have a solution for this... > > * Network File Systems. > If you have a constellation of: system1 and system2 where > system2 online means system1 is online, too, then you might > install a "file server" (NFS or similar) on system1 and share > files through this mechanism. From all approaches proposed, I > would recommend this as being the least complex in operation > although this does not mean it is the least complex to setup. > > * "Cloud"-like file synchronization. > These usually require a "third" server, too. And in my experience, > whenever one is using "synchronized" files for non-trivial data > processing (e.g. creating and reading a lot of files, storing a > database, accessing the data with many processes...) most of these > systems will fail one way or another (up to causing data loss). Yet, > most people using such systems do not seem to have these issues :) > These tools are useful in scenarios where there is no guarantee for > any machine being online the same time as the other although this is > achieved at the cost of running a "third" machine 24/7... > > HTH and YMMV > Linux-Fan I really liked your *detailed* post! It really is a detailed and comprehensive answer. In my use case, I have both a safe and a secure remote server machine (VM) and a raspberry Pi at my home to run continuously & incessantly 24/7. I have three computers. One at work a laptop and a desktop computer. What I want is for the three computers to have specific directories and files shared/synchronized. ( Probably the whole /home directory of my user. ) I also want to be able to sometimes share/send my files - securely - to third parties. What do you think is the best approach for me? Maybe Syncthing + Nextcloud ? Thank you. Tasos
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Patrick Scribus <pythonic.tuchs@gmx.net> - 2020-03-24 22:10 +0100
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-03-24 22:40 +0100
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Brian Sammon <debian-user@brisammon.fastmail.fm> - 2020-03-24 22:50 +0100
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-03-24 23:20 +0100
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Peter Ehlert <peter@sdi-baja.com> - 2020-03-25 01:00 +0100
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-03-25 00:00 +0100
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2020-03-25 10:30 +0100
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2020-03-25 11:50 +0100
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-03-25 12:10 +0100
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-03-25 00:10 +0100
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync "der.hans" <deb-user@LuftHans.com> - 2020-03-25 00:20 +0100
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Mark Allums <mark@allums.email> - 2020-03-25 01:10 +0100
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2020-03-25 06:40 +0100
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Anastasios Lisgaras <tasosnumberten@yahoo.gr> - 2020-03-25 09:00 +0100
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-03-25 10:10 +0100
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2020-03-25 15:50 +0100
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Anastasios Lisgaras <tasosnumberten@yahoo.gr> - 2020-04-04 14:10 +0200
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2020-04-04 15:20 +0200
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-04-04 17:00 +0200
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Leslie Rhorer <lesrhorer@att.net> - 2020-04-04 18:50 +0200
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Anastasios Lisgaras <tasosnumberten@yahoo.gr> - 2020-04-05 14:50 +0200
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Peter Ehlert <peter@sdi-baja.com> - 2020-04-05 16:10 +0200
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Anastasios Lisgaras <tasosnumberten@yahoo.gr> - 2020-04-05 22:20 +0200
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Peter Ehlert <peter@sdi-baja.com> - 2020-04-06 21:10 +0200
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Anastasios Lisgaras <tasosnumberten@yahoo.gr> - 2020-04-07 19:00 +0200
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Peter Ehlert <peter@sdi-baja.com> - 2020-04-07 22:40 +0200
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2020-04-08 04:20 +0200
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2020-04-08 14:30 +0200
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Peter Ehlert <peter@sdi-baja.com> - 2020-04-08 17:30 +0200
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-04 18:00 +0200
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-04 18:10 +0200
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Linux-Fan <Ma_Sys.ma@web.de> - 2020-04-04 20:50 +0200
Re: how to keep 2 PCs partially in sync Linux-Fan <Ma_Sys.ma@web.de> - 2020-03-25 18:50 +0100
csiph-web