Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #209517

Re: Insidious systemd

From Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Insidious systemd
Date 2019-06-02 06:10 +0200
Message-ID <y4pYK-Y5-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <y2dfk-7MG-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <y2S8N-82K-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <y39jk-2gg-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <y3chb-47H-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <y4bM6-kh-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Sat, 1 Jun 2019 14:39:41 +0200
Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> wrote:

> On 2019-05-29 12:01:44 -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 May 2019 17:43:49 +0200
> > Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> wrote:  
> > > He shouldn't. I've a machine that is still under sysvinit, and
> > > I can install wicd without any dependency issue.  
> > 
> > What version OS you running? Fully up-to-date? GNOME? Or something else?  
> 
> Debian/unstable (which should now be very similar to testing), fully
> up-to-date except a few unrelated packages. Various GNOME packages
> installed.

Maybe, the "problem's" been fixed.

> Note: The dependency resolvers are sometimes wrong, sometimes wanting
> to remove/replace packages even when this is not needed. In such a
> case, a solution is to provide packages you want to keep, e.g. for
> sysvinit-core:

Could be the reason, but I shouldn't have to do that.  That's why I
don't think an init system should every be a dependency of the system or
any app.  None of the others are.  Why does systemd have to be?

Thanks for your advice.

B

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Insidious systemd Patrick Bartek <patrick.bartek@gmail.com> - 2019-05-27 04:10 +0200
  Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2019-05-27 09:50 +0200
    Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2019-05-27 18:30 +0200
    Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) arne <sp113438@telfort.nl> - 2019-05-28 05:00 +0200
      Re: lightweight wifi UI (Was: Insidious systemd) Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2019-05-28 10:40 +0200
  Re: Insidious systemd Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@gmail.com> - 2019-05-28 23:50 +0200
    Re: Insidious systemd Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2019-05-29 03:00 +0200
    Re: Insidious systemd Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2019-05-29 18:10 +0200
      Re: Insidious systemd Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2019-05-29 21:20 +0200
        Re: Insidious systemd Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2019-06-01 15:00 +0200
          Re: Insidious systemd Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2019-06-02 06:10 +0200
            Re: Insidious systemd David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-06-02 07:30 +0200
              Re: Insidious systemd Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2019-06-03 08:00 +0200
      Re: Insidious systemd Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@gmail.com> - 2019-05-29 21:30 +0200

csiph-web